Timothy F Cloughesy1, Kevin Petrecca2, Tobias Walbert3, Nicholas Butowski4, Michael Salacz5, James Perry6, Denise Damek7, Daniela Bota8, Chetan Bettegowda9, Jay-Jiguang Zhu10, Fabio Iwamoto11, Dimitris Placantonakis12, Lyndon Kim13,14, Brad Elder15, George Kaptain16, David Cachia17, Yaron Moshel18, Steven Brem19, David Piccioni20, Joseph Landolfi21, Clark C Chen22, Harry Gruber23,24, Aliz R Rao23,25, Daniel Hogan23,26, William Accomando23,27, Derek Ostertag23,28, Tiffany T Montellano23,29, Thian Kheoh23,30, Fairooz Kabbinavar23,31, Michael A Vogelbaum32. 1. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 2. Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. 4. University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 5. University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. 6. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 7. University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 8. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 9. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 10. University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas. 11. Columbia University, New York, New York. 12. New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. 13. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 14. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York. 15. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 16. John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University, Hackensack, New Jersey. 17. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 18. Overlook Medical Center, Summit, New Jersey. 19. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 20. University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 21. JFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey. 22. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 23. Formerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California. 24. AmpiSwitch, San Diego, California. 25. Bionano Genomics, San Diego, California. 26. Impossible Foods, San Francisco, California. 27. Fate Therapeutics, San Diego, California. 28. Abintus Bio, San Diego, California. 29. Kura Oncology, San Diego, California. 30. Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, California. 31. Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, California. 32. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Abstract
Importance: New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Objective: To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) withflucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS. Results:All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.
RCT Entities:
Importance: New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Objective: To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS. Results: All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.
Authors: Jennifer L Clarke; Michele M Ennis; W K Alfred Yung; Susan M Chang; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Lisa M Deangelis; H Ian Robins; Frank S Lieberman; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Mark R Gilbert; Minesh Mehta; John G Kuhn; Kenneth D Aldape; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael D Prados Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Walter Taal; Hendrika M Oosterkamp; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Laurens V Beerepoot; Monique C J Hanse; Jan Buter; Aafke H Honkoop; Dolf Boerman; Filip Y F de Vos; Winand N M Dinjens; Roelien H Enting; Martin J B Taphoorn; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Rob L H Jansen; Dieta Brandsma; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Irene van Heuvel; René M Vernhout; Bronno van der Holt; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Valsamo Anagnostou; Mark Yarchoan; Aaron R Hansen; Hao Wang; Franco Verde; Elad Sharon; Deborah Collyar; Laura Q M Chow; Patrick M Forde Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Joseph Landolfi; Michael A Vogelbaum; Derek Ostertag; James B Elder; Stephen Bloomfield; Bob Carter; Clark C Chen; Steven N Kalkanis; Santosh Kesari; Albert Lai; Ian Y Lee; Linda M Liau; Tom Mikkelsen; Phioanh Nghiemphu; David Piccioni; William Accomando; Oscar R Diago; Daniel J Hogan; Dawn Gammon; Noriyuki Kasahara; Thian Kheoh; Douglas J Jolly; Harry E Gruber; Asha Das; Tobias Walbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; Paul Mulholland; Bart Neyns; L Burt Nabors; Mario Campone; Antje Wick; Warren Mason; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn S Ashby; John Degroot; Rao Gattamaneni; Lawrence Cher; Mark Rosenthal; Franz Payer; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Rakesh K Jain; A Gregory Sorensen; John Xu; Qi Liu; Martin van den Bent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Andrew Brenner; John F de Groot; Nicholas A Butowski; Leor Zach; Jian L Campian; Benjamin M Ellingson; Laurence S Freedman; Yael C Cohen; Noa Lowenton-Spier; Tamar Rachmilewitz Minei; Shifra Fain Shmueli; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: David A Reardon; Alba A Brandes; Antonio Omuro; Paul Mulholland; Michael Lim; Antje Wick; Joachim Baehring; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Patrick Roth; Oliver Bähr; Surasak Phuphanich; Juan Manuel Sepulveda; Paul De Souza; Solmaz Sahebjam; Michael Carleton; Kay Tatsuoka; Corina Taitt; Ricardo Zwirtes; John Sampson; Michael Weller Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Martin Van Den Bent; Marica Eoli; Juan Manuel Sepulveda; Marion Smits; Annemiek Walenkamp; Jean-Sebastian Frenel; Enrico Franceschi; Paul M Clement; Olivier Chinot; Filip De Vos; Nicolas Whenham; Paul Sanghera; Michael Weller; H J Dubbink; Pim French; Jim Looman; Jyotirmoy Dey; Scott Krause; Pete Ansell; Sarah Nuyens; Maarten Spruyt; Joana Brilhante; Corneel Coens; Thierry Gorlia; Vassilis Golfinopoulos Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Alexander F Haddad; Jacob S Young; Nikhil V Mummaneni; Noriyuki Kasahara; Manish K Aghi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mahmoud S Alghamri; Brandon L McClellan; Carson S Hartlage; Santiago Haase; Syed Mohd Faisal; Rohit Thalla; Ali Dabaja; Kaushik Banerjee; Stephen V Carney; Anzar A Mujeeb; Michael R Olin; James J Moon; Anna Schwendeman; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.988