Literature DB >> 33119048

Effect of Vocimagene Amiretrorepvec in Combination With Flucytosine vs Standard of Care on Survival Following Tumor Resection in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Timothy F Cloughesy1, Kevin Petrecca2, Tobias Walbert3, Nicholas Butowski4, Michael Salacz5, James Perry6, Denise Damek7, Daniela Bota8, Chetan Bettegowda9, Jay-Jiguang Zhu10, Fabio Iwamoto11, Dimitris Placantonakis12, Lyndon Kim13,14, Brad Elder15, George Kaptain16, David Cachia17, Yaron Moshel18, Steven Brem19, David Piccioni20, Joseph Landolfi21, Clark C Chen22, Harry Gruber23,24, Aliz R Rao23,25, Daniel Hogan23,26, William Accomando23,27, Derek Ostertag23,28, Tiffany T Montellano23,29, Thian Kheoh23,30, Fairooz Kabbinavar23,31, Michael A Vogelbaum32.   

Abstract

Importance: New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Objective: To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS.
Results: All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33119048      PMCID: PMC7596685          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  21 in total

1.  Is surgery at progression a prognostic marker for improved 6-month progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma?

Authors:  Jennifer L Clarke; Michele M Ennis; W K Alfred Yung; Susan M Chang; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Lisa M Deangelis; H Ian Robins; Frank S Lieberman; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Mark R Gilbert; Minesh Mehta; John G Kuhn; Kenneth D Aldape; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Walter Taal; Hendrika M Oosterkamp; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Laurens V Beerepoot; Monique C J Hanse; Jan Buter; Aafke H Honkoop; Dolf Boerman; Filip Y F de Vos; Winand N M Dinjens; Roelien H Enting; Martin J B Taphoorn; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Rob L H Jansen; Dieta Brandsma; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Irene van Heuvel; René M Vernhout; Bronno van der Holt; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Immuno-oncology Trial Endpoints: Capturing Clinically Meaningful Activity.

Authors:  Valsamo Anagnostou; Mark Yarchoan; Aaron R Hansen; Hao Wang; Franco Verde; Elad Sharon; Deborah Collyar; Laura Q M Chow; Patrick M Forde
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Durable complete responses in some recurrent high-grade glioma patients treated with Toca 511 + Toca FC.

Authors:  Timothy F Cloughesy; Joseph Landolfi; Michael A Vogelbaum; Derek Ostertag; James B Elder; Stephen Bloomfield; Bob Carter; Clark C Chen; Steven N Kalkanis; Santosh Kesari; Albert Lai; Ian Y Lee; Linda M Liau; Tom Mikkelsen; Phioanh Nghiemphu; David Piccioni; William Accomando; Oscar R Diago; Daniel J Hogan; Dawn Gammon; Noriyuki Kasahara; Thian Kheoh; Douglas J Jolly; Harry E Gruber; Asha Das; Tobias Walbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; Paul Mulholland; Bart Neyns; L Burt Nabors; Mario Campone; Antje Wick; Warren Mason; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn S Ashby; John Degroot; Rao Gattamaneni; Lawrence Cher; Mark Rosenthal; Franz Payer; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Rakesh K Jain; A Gregory Sorensen; John Xu; Qi Liu; Martin van den Bent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  IDH mutations predict longer survival and response to temozolomide in secondary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Qi SongTao; Yu Lei; Gui Si; Ding YanQing; Han HuiXia; Zhang XueLin; Wu LanXiao; Yao Fei
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 6.518

8.  A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE).

Authors:  Timothy F Cloughesy; Andrew Brenner; John F de Groot; Nicholas A Butowski; Leor Zach; Jian L Campian; Benjamin M Ellingson; Laurence S Freedman; Yael C Cohen; Noa Lowenton-Spier; Tamar Rachmilewitz Minei; Shifra Fain Shmueli; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Alba A Brandes; Antonio Omuro; Paul Mulholland; Michael Lim; Antje Wick; Joachim Baehring; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Patrick Roth; Oliver Bähr; Surasak Phuphanich; Juan Manuel Sepulveda; Paul De Souza; Solmaz Sahebjam; Michael Carleton; Kay Tatsuoka; Corina Taitt; Ricardo Zwirtes; John Sampson; Michael Weller
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  INTELLANCE 2/EORTC 1410 randomized phase II study of Depatux-M alone and with temozolomide vs temozolomide or lomustine in recurrent EGFR amplified glioblastoma.

Authors:  Martin Van Den Bent; Marica Eoli; Juan Manuel Sepulveda; Marion Smits; Annemiek Walenkamp; Jean-Sebastian Frenel; Enrico Franceschi; Paul M Clement; Olivier Chinot; Filip De Vos; Nicolas Whenham; Paul Sanghera; Michael Weller; H J Dubbink; Pim French; Jim Looman; Jyotirmoy Dey; Scott Krause; Pete Ansell; Sarah Nuyens; Maarten Spruyt; Joana Brilhante; Corneel Coens; Thierry Gorlia; Vassilis Golfinopoulos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.300

View more
  33 in total

1.  CTLA4 has a profound impact on the landscape of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with a high prognosis value in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Authors:  Shiyi Liu; Feiyan Wang; Wei Tan; Li Zhang; Fangfang Dai; Yanqing Wang; Yaqi Fan; Mengqin Yuan; Dongyong Yang; Yajing Zheng; Zhimin Deng; Yeqiang Liu; Yanxiang Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 2.  Immunologic aspects of viral therapy for glioblastoma and implications for interactions with immunotherapies.

Authors:  Alexander F Haddad; Jacob S Young; Nikhil V Mummaneni; Noriyuki Kasahara; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Malignant Glioma and Their Application in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Madison L Shoaf; Annick Desjardins
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Oncolytic virotherapy as immunotherapy.

Authors:  Alan Melcher; Kevin Harrington; Richard Vile
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Immunotherapy for Neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Nazanin K Majd; Pushan R Dasgupta; John F de Groot
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Anti-Tumor Effects of MAPK-Dependent Tumor-Selective Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Armed with CD/UPRT against Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Mice.

Authors:  Hajime Kurosaki; Motomu Nakatake; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Nozomi Kuwano; Masato Yamane; Kenta Ishii; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Takafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 7.  Targeting Neuroinflammation in Brain Cancer: Uncovering Mechanisms, Pharmacological Targets, and Neuropharmaceutical Developments.

Authors:  Mahmoud S Alghamri; Brandon L McClellan; Carson S Hartlage; Santiago Haase; Syed Mohd Faisal; Rohit Thalla; Ali Dabaja; Kaushik Banerjee; Stephen V Carney; Anzar A Mujeeb; Michael R Olin; James J Moon; Anna Schwendeman; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.988

8.  Current evidence and challenges of systematic therapies for adult recurrent glioblastoma: Results from clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenlin Chen; Delin Liu; Penghao Liu; Ziren Kong; Yaning Wang; Yu Wang; Wenbin Ma
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.026

9.  A risk signature of four aging-related genes has clinical prognostic value and is associated with a tumor immune microenvironment in glioma.

Authors:  Haitao Luo; Chuming Tao; Xiaoyan Long; Kai Huang; Xingen Zhu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 10.  Oncolytic Viruses for Malignant Glioma: On the Verge of Success?

Authors:  Yogesh R Suryawanshi; Autumn J Schulze
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.