Jigal Haas1,2, Tal Elkan Miller3,4, Ravit Nahum3,4, Adva Aizer3,4, Michal Kirshenbaum3,4, Eran Zilberberg3,4, Oshrit Lebovitz3,4, Raoul Orvieto3,4. 1. IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52620, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. jigalh@hotmail.com. 2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel. jigalh@hotmail.com. 3. IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52620, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. 4. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of non-male factor infertile patients aged ≥ 39. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, between March 2018 and December 2019. Sixty-nine patients were recruited, and sixty patients participated in the study. Their ovaries were randomized prior to the beginning of the ovarian stimulation: the oocytes from one side (n = 257) were allocated to the ICSI (ICSI arm), while those of the contralateral side (n = 258) were allocated to conventional insemination (IVF arm). The fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved, number of zygotes (2PN), and cleavage-stage embryos were assessed and compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: The average number of zygotes (3.1 vs. 2.7 p = 0.45), the fertilization rate (72.4% vs. 65.1% p = 0.38), the average number of cleavage-stage (2.8 vs. 2.4 p = 0.29), and the average top-quality embryos (TQE) cleavage-stage embryos (1.7 vs. 1.6 p = 0.94) were comparable between the two groups. The TQE rate per randomized oocyte (41.2% vs. 41% p = 0.8) was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI does not improve the reproductive outcomes of advanced-age patients undergoing conventional insemination for non-male factor infertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03370068.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of non-male factor infertile patients aged ≥ 39. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, between March 2018 and December 2019. Sixty-nine patients were recruited, and sixty patients participated in the study. Their ovaries were randomized prior to the beginning of the ovarian stimulation: the oocytes from one side (n = 257) were allocated to the ICSI (ICSI arm), while those of the contralateral side (n = 258) were allocated to conventional insemination (IVF arm). The fertilization rate per oocyte retrieved, number of zygotes (2PN), and cleavage-stage embryos were assessed and compared between the two study groups. RESULTS: The average number of zygotes (3.1 vs. 2.7 p = 0.45), the fertilization rate (72.4% vs. 65.1% p = 0.38), the average number of cleavage-stage (2.8 vs. 2.4 p = 0.29), and the average top-quality embryos (TQE) cleavage-stage embryos (1.7 vs. 1.6 p = 0.94) were comparable between the two groups. The TQE rate per randomized oocyte (41.2% vs. 41% p = 0.8) was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI does not improve the reproductive outcomes of advanced-age patients undergoing conventional insemination for non-male factor infertility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03370068.