| Literature DB >> 33117607 |
Viet Nhat Hung Le1,2, Deniz Hos1,3, Yanhong Hou1,4,5, Madlen Witt6, Mikhail Barkovskiy6, Felix Bock1, Claus Cursiefen1,3.
Abstract
Purpose: Semifluorinated alkanes (SFAs) are used at the ocular surface as lubricants or vehicles for drugs. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) TrapR1R2 suspended in the SFA perfluorohexyloctane (Trap/F6H8) on corneal neovascularization.Entities:
Keywords: VEGF Trap; aflibercept; corneal neovascularization; hemangiogenesis; lymphangiogenesis; semifluorinated alkanes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33117607 PMCID: PMC7571278 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Stability of the VEGF TrapR1R2 Suspension in F6H8
| Temperature | Test | Method | 0 mo | 1 mo | 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2–8°C | Assay | UV – Absorption | 4.01 mg/mL | 4.11 mg/mL | 4.28 mg/mL |
| Activity | ELISA | 103.6% | n. t. | 90.8% | |
| Aggregation | SEC-MALS | <LOD | 1.1% | 0.25% | |
| 25°C / 65% RH | Assay | UV – Absorption | 4.01 mg/mL | 4.19 mg/mL | 4.25 mg/mL |
| Activity | ELISA | 103.6% | n. t. | 96.5% | |
| Aggregation | SEC-MALS | <LOD | 1.8% | 0.5% |
Samples of the water-free VEGF TrapR1R2 suspension in F6H8 were assayed for concentration, protein aggregation and fragmentation, as well as protein activity at 0, 1, and 3 months. The VEGF TrapR1R2 suspension in F6H8 was exceptionally stable in respect to assay, aggregation, and activity, even when stored at ambient temperature for at least 3 months (two replicas at each time point).
Figure 1.Inhibition of corneal blood and lymphatic vessels after topical administration of Trap/F6H8 for 14 days. Wholemount immunohistochemistry staining (A–D) was carried out to quantify the corneal area covered by blood and lymphatic vessels. Blood vessels (green) were stained with CD31 (E–H: blood vessels) and lymphatic vessels (red) were stained with LYVE-1 (I–L: lymphatic vessels). Blood and lymphatic vessels were significantly inhibited in groups treated with Trap/F6H8 and Trap compared to control groups F6H8 and phosphate buffer (n = 10 each group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001). Between the two treatment groups, there was no significant difference in the inhibition of hem- or lymphangiogenesis (n = 10 each group, ns = P > 0.05).
Figure 2.Effect of Trap/F6H8 in inhibiting corneal hem- and lymphangiogenesis after 3 days. Quantitative analysis at day 3 revealed a significant inhibition of the ingrowth of blood vessels in both treatment groups (Trap/F6H8 and Trap) compared to control groups (F6H8 and phosphate buffer (A). Trap/F6H8 was more effective than Trap at this time point in inhibiting corneal hemangiogenesis (P < 0.05). Whereas Trap/F6H8 and Trap had effects on hemangiogenesis, both did not significantly inhibit lymphangiogenesis at this time point (B). However, the number of lymphatic vessel sprouts, branches, and end points were significantly reduced in both treatment groups in comparison to control groups (C–E) (n = 10 each group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001).
Figure 3.Reduction of CD45. Corneal CD45+ cells were significantly lower at day three in the Trap/F6H8 group and the Trap group compared to the control groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups (n = 5 each group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Figure 4.Corneal epithelial wound closure after topical application of Trap/F6H8. (A) Representative fluorescein staining images illustrate epithelial defect healing from day 0 (time of corneal epithelial removal) until day 8 among groups treated with Trap/F6H8, Trap, or control groups (F6H8 or phosphate buffer). (B) All corneas achieved complete re-epithelialization 8 days after corneal abrasion with no significant difference between all groups from day 0 to day 8.