| Literature DB >> 33116683 |
Yanyan Liu1,2,3, Weihua Shen4, Yating Sun1, Na Lv1, Kaili Sun5, Lifen Hu1, Ying Ye1,2,3, Yufeng Gao1,2,3, Jiabin Li1,2,3,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance profiles and distribution of virulence-related genes (VRGs) among Shigella isolates in Anhui, China, and to identify the correlation between the VRGs and antimicrobial resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Shigella flexneri; Shigella sonnei; antimicrobial resistance; type III secretion system; virulence-related gene
Year: 2020 PMID: 33116683 PMCID: PMC7585282 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S274862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Sequences of the Primers Used for PCR Amplification
| Target Gene | Primer | Sequence (5′–3′) | Annealing Temperature | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGGAAAAACTCAGTGCCTCT | 57 °C | 423 | ||
| CCAGTCCGTAAATTCATTCT | ||||
| CCTGTGTCCCCGAGAAAGAGA | 60 °C | 628 | ||
| TGACGCACAGGCAAAACTTG | ||||
| CAAGCCCTGAATCCGATCAT | 60 °C | 204 | ||
| TGCTGCTGCCTGTTTACCAA | ||||
| CCTCACCACAAACTAACTCTAGCA | 60 °C | 93 | ||
| GAGAAGTTTTATGTTCAGTTGACAGGGATA | ||||
| AAGAAGCCGAGCTTGATGGAG | 60 °C | 450 | ||
| CCTCGCCATTTCCACCTAGA | ||||
| CTGGATGGTATGGTGAGG | 57 °C | 320 | ||
| GGAGGCCAACAATTATTTCC | ||||
| CGCGCGAGACAGATTCTCTT | 60 °C | 488 | ||
| TGGTGGATTTGTGCAACGAC | ||||
| AGCTCAGGCAATGAAACTTTGAC | 57 °C | 618 | ||
| TGGGCTTGATATTCCGATAAGTC | ||||
| TCCCTTCATACTGGCTCCTG | 57 °C | 553 | ||
| AACACTCTGGGGGGAACAG | ||||
| ATCTCCTTGAGGCCAGCAAA | 58 °C | 296 | ||
| GGAAGGAATGGGAGGACGAA | ||||
| CCAACCCCTCTCATGCAT | 60 °C | 83 | ||
| ATCACCAGCACCACCATGAC | ||||
| GGCCTGCATCAAGTCTTTCG | 60 °C | 280 | ||
| GGCATCGGTACAGCCAAAAA | ||||
| ACCGACTTCTCACTTTCTCCCG | 58 °C | 430 | ||
| CCATCCAGCTGCATAGTGTTTG | ||||
| TCAGAAGCTCAGCGAATCATTG | 59 °C | 930 | ||
| CCATTATCACCAGTAAAACGCACC | ||||
| ACTGGATCTTAAGGCTCAGGAT | 58 °C | 570 | ||
| GACTTAATGTCACTGTTCAGCG | ||||
| GCAGTGGAAATATGATGCGGC | 58 °C | 789 | ||
| TTGTTCAGATCGGAGAAGAACG |
Figure 1The yearly distribution of the proportions of the Shigella isolates.
Figure 2Age and gender distribution of Shigella isolates in China from 2011 to 2015. (A) The distribution of the proportions of Shigella isolates by age group. (B) Comparison of the proportion of S. flexneri and S. sonnei by gender group.
MIC50 and MIC90 of 17 Antimicrobial Agents Against S. Flexneri and S. Sonnei
| Antimicrobial Agent | R | R | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||||
| (μg/mL) | (μg/mL) | (μg/mL) | (%) | (μg/mL) | (μg/mL) | (μg/mL) | (%) | |||
| AMP | 0.5 – >256 | >256 | >256 | 97.3 | 32 – >256 | >256 | >256 | 100 | ||
| NAL | 1 – >256 | >256 | >256 | 96.9 | 1 – >256 | 128 | >256 | 98.5 | ||
| TCY | 0.25 – >128 | 128 | >128 | 93.8 | 1 – >128 | 64 | >128 | 94.1 | ||
| CHL | 0.5 – >256 | 64 | 128 | 86.6 | 1 – >256 | 4 | 16 | 8.8 | 198.334 | <0.0001* |
| SXT | 0.125 – >32 | 16 | 32 | 76.2 | 0.125–32 | 16 | 32 | 92.6 | 9.449 | 0.002* |
| CTX | 0.0625 – >32 | 16 | 64 | 53 | 0.0625 – >32 | 16 | >32 | 52.9 | ||
| CIP | 0.0625 – >32 | 4 | 16 | 49.7 | 0.125 – >32 | 0.25 | 16 | 19.1 | 22.213 | <0.0001* |
| CRO | 0.0625 – >32 | 0.125 | 32 | 45.7 | 0.0625 – >32 | 0.0625 | 16 | 33.8 | ||
| LVX | 0.125–64 | 4 | 16 | 30.5 | 0.125 – >64 | 0.5 | 8 | 10.3 | 12.013 | 0.001* |
| GEN | 0.25 – >128 | 1 | >128 | 28.7 | 0.5 – >128 | 64 | 128 | 92.6 | 103.345 | <0.0001* |
| FOS | 4 – >2048 | 64 | >2048 | 24.5 | 16 – >2048 | 128 | 256 | 26.5 | ||
| FEP | 0.5–256 | 1 | 32 | 21.6 | 0.5–128 | 0.5 | 32 | 19.1 | ||
| CAZ | 0.25–128 | 0.5 | 16 | 21.2 | 0.25–128 | 0.25 | 16 | 17.6 | ||
| FOX | 0.5 – >256 | 4 | 8 | 3.3 | 0.5 – >256 | 4 | 16 | 1.5 | ||
| AMK | 1 – >512 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1–16 | 4 | 8 | 0 | ||
| IPM | 0.0625–8 | 1 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.25–16 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | ||
| TZP | 1–128 | 8 | 16 | 0.7 | 2–32 | 8 | 16 | 0 | ||
Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; NAL, nalidixic acid; TCY, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; FOX, cefoxitin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; LEV, levofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; TZP, piperacillin–tazobactam; FOS, fosfomycin; IMP, imipenem; MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; R, resistance.
Note: *Chi-square test.
Distribution of Virulence-Related Genes Among Shigella Isolates in Anhui, China
| Gene | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 449 (100%) | 68 (100%) | ||
| 431 (96.0%) | 51 (75.0%) | <0.0001# | |
| 442 (98.4%) | 65 (95.6%) | ||
| 448 (99.8%) | 67 (98.5%) | ||
| 443 (98.7%) | 66 (97.1%) | ||
| 443 (98.7%) | 65 (95.6%) | ||
| 439 (97.8%) | 66 (97.1%) | ||
| 431 (96.0%) | 51 (75.0%) | <0.0001# | |
| 420 (93.5%) | 0 | ||
| 413 (92.0%) | 60 (88.2%) | ||
| 448 (99.8%) | 67 (98.5%) | ||
| 439 (97.8%) | 66 (97.1%) | ||
| 415 (92.4%) | 64 (94.1%) | ||
| 421 (93.8%) | 0 | ||
| 396 (88.2%) | 0 | ||
| 394 (87.8%) | 0 | ||
Note: #Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 3Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between virulence-related gene (VRG)-positive (ial, virF, sepA, pic, sat, and set) and VRG-negative S. flexneri. (A) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between ial-positive and ial-negative S. flexneri. (B) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between virF-positive and virF-negative S. flexneri. (C) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between sepA-positive and sepA-negative S. flexneri. (D) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between pic-positive and pic-negative S. flexneri. (E) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between sat-positive and sat-negative S. flexneri. (F) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between set-positive and set-negative S. flexneri. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.001.
Figure 4Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between virulence-related gene (VRG)-positive (ipaA, ipaC, ipaD, virB, icsB, sigA, and sen) and VRG-negative S. flexneri. (A) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between ipaA-positive and ipaA-negative S. flexneri. (B) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between ipaC/ipaD-positive and ipaC/ipaD-negative S. flexneri. (C) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between virB-positive and virB-negative S. flexneri. (D) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between icsB-positive and icsB-negative S. flexneri. (E) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between sigA-positive and sigA-negative S. flexneri. (F) Comparison of the antimicrobial resistance rates between for sen-positive and sen-negative S. flexneri. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.001.