| Literature DB >> 33116573 |
Shushan Yan1, Xiaoxia Ren2, Jinghan Yang3, Jinghua Wang3, Quan Zhang4, Donghua Xu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence has implicated that exosomes-delivered noncoding RNAs are key regulators in carcinogenesis. The effect of miR-548c-5p has been elucidated in some cancers. However, the role of exosomal miR-548c-5p in colorectal cancer (CRC) is not fully understood. We aim to explore the function and mechanism of exosome-delivered miR-548c-5p in CRC. The altering effect of exosome-derived miR-548c-5p on the prognosis of CRC patients is also investigated by estimating overall survival and disease-free survival.Entities:
Keywords: CDC42; HIF1A; colorectal cancer; exosome; microRNA
Year: 2020 PMID: 33116573 PMCID: PMC7547144 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S273008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Characteristics of Patients
| Low Exosomal miR-548c-5p (n=67) | High Exosomal miR-548c-5p (n=37) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| <59 | 29 | 16 |
| ≥59 | 38 | 21 |
| Gender | ||
| Women | 25 | 10 |
| Men | 42 | 27 |
| TNM stage | ||
| I | 10 | 7 |
| II | 37 | 18 |
| III | 10 | 4 |
| IV | 10 | 8 |
| Liver metastasis | ||
| + | 10 | 3 |
| - | 57 | 34 |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||
| + | 13 | 4 |
| - | 54 | 33 |
| Tumor differentiation | ||
| Low | 20 | 7 |
| Moderate | 16 | 14 |
| High | 31 | 16 |
Abbreviation: TNM, tumor node metastasis.
Figure 1Exosomal miR-548c-5p affects CRC cell growth, migration and invasion. (A) MiR-548c-5p in exosomes of SW480 and HCT116 cells compared with normal cell line Henle-407 (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (B) MiR-548c-5p in CRC cells treated by miRNA mimics (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (C) MiR-548c-5p in exosomes-containing supernatant and exosomes purified from the cultural supernatant of SW480 and HCT116 cells (n = 3). (D) SW480 proliferation assay by MTT at 490nm (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (E) HCT116 proliferation assay by MTT at 490nm (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (F) Invasion number of SW480 cells assayed by transwell (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (G) Representative picture of transwell assay for SW480 cells stimulated by exosomal miR-548c-5p. (H) Representative picture of scratch test for SW480 cells stimulated by exosomal miR-548c-5p.
Figure 2HIF1A is a target of miR-548c-5p. (A) MiR-548c-5p recognizes the bases of HIF1A 3ʹUTR scanned in TargetScan database. (B) Luciferase reporter assay (Compared with mimics control group, **p < 0.01; n = 3). (C) HIF1A mRNA in CRC cells (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (D) Protein of HIF1A in CRC cells determined by Western blot (Representative picture).
Figure 3MiR-548c-5p/HIF1A/CDC42 axis regulates CRC cell proliferation and invasion. (A) Decreased expression of HIF1A and CDC42 in SW480 cells treated by miR-548c-5p mimics (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (B) Expression of HIF1A mRNA in SW480 cells transfected by lentivirus plasmids with HIF1A-OE and HIF1A-KO (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; n = 3). (C) CDC42 in immunoprecipitates estimated by real-time PCR (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (D) Expression of CDC42 in immunoprecipitates estimated by real-time PCR (**p < 0.01; n = 3). (E) Luciferase reporter assay shows enhanced luciferase activity of CDC42 promoter in HIF1A overexpressed cells (***p < 0.001; n = 3). (F) MTT estimating SW480 cell proliferation (comparing with control: **p < 0.01; comparing with CDC42-OE group; &p < 0.05, &&p < 0.01; n = 3). (G) Transwell assay assessing SW480 cell invasion (comparing with control: **p < 0.01; comparing with CDC42-OE group: &&p < 0.01; n = 3).
Figure 4Exosomes-derived miR-548c-5p restrains CRC tumor growth in vivo. (A) MiR-548c-5p from exosomes slows down the growth of CDC42 overexpressed CRC cells in nude mice (comparing with control: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; comparing with CDC42-OE group: &p < 0.05). (B) HIF1A mRNA expression in tumors from nude mice (**, p < 0.01). (C) Representative picture for subcutaneous tumor formation in nude mice. (D) Tumor size of nude mice at 6 weeks after subcutaneous implantation (comparing with control: **p < 0.01; comparing with CDC42-OE group: &p < 0.05).
Figure 5Exosomal miR-548c-5p predicts CRC prognosis. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis of 3-year survival (P for Log rank test = 0.008). (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curve analysis of disease-free survival (P for Log rank test = 0.007).
Cox Regression Analysis
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (≥ 59) | 1.03(0.78–2.15) | 0.845 | 1.36(0.53–3.47) | 0.521 |
| Sex (M/F) | 1.15(0.51–2.60) | 0.729 | 1.30(0.55–3.08) | 0.552 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.74(0.76–2.48) | 0.338 | 1.87(0.79–2.19) | 0.440 |
| Liver metastasis | 3.15(1.38–7.21) | 0.007 | 3.20(1.24–5.37) | 0.017 |
| Late TNM Stage | 2.25(1.10–6.88) | 0.013 | 3.00(1.24–4.79) | 0.003 |
| Tumor grade | 3.69(2.25–11.36) | 0.002 | 4.28(2.27–9.01) | 0.015 |
| Low exosomal miR-548c-5p | 4.46(1.33–14.97) | 0.015 | 4.03(0.96–12.03) | 0.023 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidential interval; HR, hazard risk; TNM, tumor node metastasis.