Bessi Qorri1, William Harless2, Myron R Szewczuk1. 1. Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. 2. ENCYT Technologies Inc., Membertou, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and celecoxib have been used as potential anti-cancer therapies. Aspirin exerts its therapeutic effect in both cyclooxygenase (COX)-dependent and -independent pathways to reduce tumor growth and disable tumorigenesis. Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, reduces factors that cause inflammation and pain. The question is whether aspirin and celecoxib have other molecular targets of equal or more therapeutic efficacy with significant anti-cancer preventive benefits. AIM: Here, we propose that aspirin and celecoxib exert their anti-cancer effects by targeting and inhibiting mammalian neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1). Neu-1 has been reported to regulate the activation of several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and TOLL-like receptors and their downstream signaling pathways. Neu-1 in complex with matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been reported to be tethered to RTKs at the ectodomain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The WST-1 cell viability assay, Caspase 3/7 assay, and Annexin V assay were used to evaluate the cell viability and detect apoptotic and necrotic cells following treatment in MiaPaCa-2, PANC-1 and the gemcitabine-resistant PANC-1 variant (PANC-1 GemR) cells. Microscopic imaging, lectin cytochemistry, and flow cytometry were used to detect levels of α-2,3 sialic acid. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated live cell sialidase assays and neuraminidase assays were used to detect Neu-1 activity. Immunocytochemistry was used to detect levels of EGFR and phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) following treatment. RESULTS: For the first time, aspirin and celecoxib were shown to significantly inhibit Neu-1 sialidase activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner following stimulation with EGF. Aspirin blocked Neu-1 desialylation of α-2,3-sialic acid expression following 30 min stimulation with EGF. Aspirin and celecoxib significantly and dose-dependently inhibited isolated neuraminidase (Clostridium perfringens) activity on fluorogenic substrate 2'-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-α-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid (4-MUNANA). Aspirin inhibited phosphorylation of the EGFR in EGF-stimulated cells. Aspirin dose- and time-dependently induced CellEvent caspase-3/7+ cells as well as apoptosis and necrosis on PANC-1 cells. CONCLUSION: These findings signify a novel multimodality mechanism(s) of action for aspirin and celecoxib, specifically targeting and inhibiting Neu-1 activity, regulating EGF-induced growth receptor activation and inducing apoptosis and necrosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Repurposing aspirin and celecoxib as anti-cancer agents may also upend other critical targets involved in multistage tumorigenesis regulated by mammalian neuraminidase-1. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings may be the missing link connecting the anti-cancer efficacy of NSAIDs to the role of glycosylation in inflammation and tumorigenesis.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and celecoxib have been used as potential anti-cancer therapies. Aspirin exerts its therapeutic effect in both cyclooxygenase (COX)-dependent and -independent pathways to reduce tumor growth and disable tumorigenesis. Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, reduces factors that cause inflammation and pain. The question is whether aspirin and celecoxib have other molecular targets of equal or more therapeutic efficacy with significant anti-cancer preventive benefits. AIM: Here, we propose that aspirin and celecoxib exert their anti-cancer effects by targeting and inhibiting mammalian neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1). Neu-1 has been reported to regulate the activation of several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and TOLL-like receptors and their downstream signaling pathways. Neu-1 in complex with matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been reported to be tethered to RTKs at the ectodomain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The WST-1 cell viability assay, Caspase 3/7 assay, and Annexin V assay were used to evaluate the cell viability and detect apoptotic and necrotic cells following treatment in MiaPaCa-2, PANC-1 and the gemcitabine-resistant PANC-1 variant (PANC-1 GemR) cells. Microscopic imaging, lectin cytochemistry, and flow cytometry were used to detect levels of α-2,3 sialic acid. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated live cell sialidase assays and neuraminidase assays were used to detect Neu-1 activity. Immunocytochemistry was used to detect levels of EGFR and phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) following treatment. RESULTS: For the first time, aspirin and celecoxib were shown to significantly inhibit Neu-1 sialidase activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner following stimulation with EGF. Aspirin blocked Neu-1 desialylation of α-2,3-sialic acid expression following 30 min stimulation with EGF. Aspirin and celecoxib significantly and dose-dependently inhibited isolated neuraminidase (Clostridium perfringens) activity on fluorogenic substrate 2'-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-α-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid (4-MUNANA). Aspirin inhibited phosphorylation of the EGFR in EGF-stimulated cells. Aspirin dose- and time-dependently induced CellEvent caspase-3/7+ cells as well as apoptosis and necrosis on PANC-1 cells. CONCLUSION: These findings signify a novel multimodality mechanism(s) of action for aspirin and celecoxib, specifically targeting and inhibiting Neu-1 activity, regulating EGF-induced growth receptor activation and inducing apoptosis and necrosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Repurposing aspirin and celecoxib as anti-cancer agents may also upend other critical targets involved in multistage tumorigenesis regulated by mammalian neuraminidase-1. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings may be the missing link connecting the anti-cancer efficacy of NSAIDs to the role of glycosylation in inflammation and tumorigenesis.
Authors: A J Dannenberg; N K Altorki; J O Boyle; C Dang; L R Howe; B B Weksler; K Subbaramaiah Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Laura G M Daenen; Jeanine M L Roodhart; Miranda van Amersfoort; Mantre Dehnad; Wijnand Roessingh; Laurien H Ulfman; Patrick W B Derksen; Emile E Voest Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Tomislav Dragovich; Howard Burris; Patrick Loehrer; Daniel D Von Hoff; Sherry Chow; Steven Stratton; Sylvan Green; Yrma Obregon; Irene Alvarez; Michael Gordon Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Yiyao Zhang; Li Liu; Pei Fan; Nathalie Bauer; Jury Gladkich; Eduard Ryschich; Alexandr V Bazhin; Nathalia A Giese; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Ulf Hinz; Wolfgang Gross; Franco Fortunato; Ingrid Herr Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-04-30
Authors: Jaimie Chang; Swati S Bhasin; Diane R Bielenberg; Vikas P Sukhatme; Manoj Bhasin; Sui Huang; Mark W Kieran; Dipak Panigrahy Journal: FASEB J Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Manpreet Sambi; Vanessa Samuel; Bessi Qorri; Sabah Haq; Sergey V Burov; Elena Markvicheva; William Harless; Myron R Szewczuk Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.162
Authors: Tawanny K B Aguiar; Nilton A S Neto; Cleverson D T Freitas; Ayrles F B Silva; Leandro P Bezerra; Ellen A Malveira; Levi A C Branco; Felipe P Mesquita; Gustavo H Goldman; Luciana M R Alencar; Jose T A Oliveira; Ralph Santos-Oliveira; Pedro F N Souza Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.525