Literature DB >> 33115300

A visual risk assessment tool for acute kidney injury after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery.

Pei Zhang1, Chen Guan1, Chenyu Li1, Zhihui Zhu2, Wei Zhang1, Hong Luan1, Bin Zhou1, Xiaofei Man1, Lin Che1, Yanfei Wang1, Long Zhao1, Hui Zhang1, Congjuan Luo1, Yan Xu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to establish a predictive postoperative nomogram for acute kidney injury (AKI) after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery, in order to early identify patients with high postoperative AKI risk.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study, which included patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to select confound factors that associated with AKI, then incorporated into the nomogram. The predictive accuracy of the model was assessed by concordance index (C-Index).
RESULTS: A total of 365 patients after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery were enrolled in the study eventually, of which 68 (18.63%) suffered postoperative AKI, and the incidence of stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3 were 92.65% (63/68), 5.88% (4/68), and 1.47% (1/68), respectively. Univariate logistic regression revealed that high density lipoprotein (HDL), prothrombin time (PT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), size of aneurysm ≥10 mm, and aneurysm ruptured before surgery were associated with AKI after surgery, while multivariate logistic regression showed same results as the size of aneurysm ≥10 mm and aneurysm ruptured were independent AKI risk factors. In addition, the nomogram demonstrated a good accuracy in estimating intracranial aneurysm clipping associated AKI, as a C-Index and a bootstrap-corrected one of 0.772 and 0.737, respectively. Moreover, calibration plots showed consistency with the actual presence of AKI.
CONCLUSION: The novel nomogram model can serve as a promising predictive tool to improve the identification of AKI among those who underwent intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery; acute kidney injury; nomogram; predictive model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33115300      PMCID: PMC7599021          DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1838299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI), characterized by persistent oliguria and elevated serum creatinine, is a severe postoperative complication in hospitalized patients not only associated with high mortality and cost, but also with an increased risk for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and long-term cardiovascular mortality [1-4]. The incidence of AKI varies greatly according to the etiology in different clinical setting, while 40% of in-hospital AKI cases are related to surgical procedures [5]. Considering there is rare curative treatment except for renal replacement therapy up to now, prevention of postoperative AKI should be taken in advance to recognize high-risk patients and ameliorate their clinical condition [6]. As a major surgical technique to treat intracranial aneurysm, aneurysm clipping could largely prevent and repress intracranial hemorrhage by cutting off the aneurysm sac from normal circulation, which has been widely used in clinic. Diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysm generally require high dose contrast agent for the imaging studies, which may cause greater risk of contrast-related kidney injury [7], but neurosurgeons seem to pay little attention to renal complications, and AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping was rarely noticed. Nomogram is a simple visual tool to predict the probability of a given outcome, by which researchers had applied it to predict AKI in cardiac surgery [8], nephrectomy surgery [9] in previous studies, but it has not been applied to intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery so far. Therefore, to make early diagnosis and intervention of patients with high risks of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery, we (1) evaluated the incidence of AKI based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria; (2) analyzed the risk factors in patients who underwent intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery through multivariate logistic regression; (3) established a novel visible nomogram predictive model based on the risk factors above.

Materials and methods

Study population

Patients underwent intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from October 2012 to October 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study, and those who received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) before surgery or lack of serum creatinine (Scr) level measured within 7 days after surgery were excluded. Data used in this study was collected from our hospital information system, and there were no relevant privacy leaks of the patients, because their names were replaced with code numbers. This study was approved by the institutional review board (QDFY WZ 2018-9-13) by the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University to screen the serum creatinine level.

Definition

Scr increased 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 μmol/L) within 48 h or more than 1.5-fold compared to baseline level within 7 days were diagnosed of AKI according to KDIGO 2012 guidelines. The first Scr value measured during hospitalization was defined as baseline Scr, and AKI staging was also defined according to the KDIGO guidelines. AKI was diagnosed once the participants first met the KDIGO criteria. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI) [10]. Comorbidities mentioned in this study were all defined according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 10th Revision.

Statistical analyses

Indicators with more than 15% missing values were excluded from the data, while indicators with less than 15% missing values were interpolated using multiple interpolation method in R software with Mice package [11]. In addition, extreme outliers were defined as values beyond Q1 (the lower quartile)-3 × IQ (the difference between the lower quartile and the upper quartile) and were deleted to diminish bias. We used absolute values and percentages to express categorical variables, and continuous variables were shown as the mean ± SD. Student’ s t test, the Chi square test, Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U-test were applied appropriately when categorical or continuous variables met the applicable conditions to calculate the differences between the two groups (AKI versus non-AKI). Then the high-risk predictors of AKI were accepted to multivariate logistic regression, in which forward stepwise regression was performed. Independent variables obtained from multivariable logistic regression were selected to construct the nomogram. As a result, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, and P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. In addition, we performed a internal validation using bootstrapping technique with 1000 resamples, and Harrell’s C statistic concordance index (the Harrell C-Index) was applied to assess the discriminatory ability of the model and to reduce overfitting bias. The statistical calculation was performed via R software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org/).

Results

Incidence and characteristics of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping

In this study, 1038 patients who received intracranial aneurysm clipping were included. One patient was excluded due to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) before surgery, and 672 patients were excluded for incomplete Scr level within 7 days after surgery (Figure 1). At last, 365 patients were registered in the final study population, of which 68 (18.63%) suffered AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping. Besides, the incidence of stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3 were 92.65% (63/68), 5.88% (4/68), and 1.47% (1/68), respectively, showing that patients with intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery encompassed high incidence of AKI.
Figure 1.

Flowchart of patient enrollment.

Flowchart of patient enrollment. Patients with AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping showed higher incidence rates of diabetes mellitus (11.8% vs 3.8%, p = 0.015), but they had lower levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (83.8 ± 34.7 vs 100.8 ± 18.2, p < 0.05). For laboratory examinations, blood glucose and several indicators in blood routine, and liver function were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the two groups, suggesting that glucose, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, albumin (ALB), and high density lipoprotein (HDL) might be related to postoperative AKI. The incidence of aneurysm ruptured before surgery (82.4% vs 69.0%, p < 0.05) in AKI group were different from non-AKI group, indicated that aneurysm ruptured could be a potential risk factor for postoperative AKI. (Table 1)
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of AKI and non-AKI.

VariableAKI (n = 68)Non-AKI (n = 297)p Value
Demographic data
 Age (years)60.1 ± 12.358.5 ± 10.50.299
 Male (N, %)31 (45.6%)127 (42.8%)0.671
 BMI24.9 ± 3.529.2 ± 3.10.334
 Smoke (N, %)17 (25.0%)64 (21.5%)0.537
 Drink (N, %)11 (16.2%)49 (16.5%)0.948
 Transfusion (N, %)6 (8.8%)25 (8.4%)0.914
Comorbidities   
 Cerebral infarction (N, %)6 (8.8%)20 (6.7%)0.546
 Diabetes mellitus (N, %)8 (11.8%)15 (3.8%)0.040
 Coronary heart disease (N, %)2 (2.9%)20 (6.7%)0.238
 Hypertension (N, %)33 (48.5%)132 (44.4%)0.542
Medications
 ACEI (N, %)11 (16.2%)28 (9.4%)0.104
 ARB (N, %)11 (16.2%)60 (20.2%)0.449
 β-Blocker (N, %)31 (45.6%)159 (53.5%)0.237
 Statin (N, %)4 (5.9%)26 (8.8%)0.437
 CCB (N, %)64 (94.1%)285 (96.0%)0.503
 Aspirin (N, %)16 (23.5%)78 (26.3%)0.642
 Antibiotic (N, %)62 (91.2%)281 (94.6%)0.429
 NSAID (N, %)25 (36.8%)133 (44.8%)0.229
 PPI (N, %)65 (95.6%)286 (96.3%)0.784
Laboratory data
 eGFR (ml/min/1.732)83.8 ± 34.7100.8 ± 18.2<0.001
 Scr (μmol/L)72.3 ± 68.170.9 ± 23.20.769
 Glucose (mmol/L)7.8 ± 2.37.0 ± 2.50.015
 Hb (g/L)130.8 ± 20.0129.9 ± 19.80.739
 PLT (×109/L)212.9 ± 50.1219.8 ± 63.30.400
 RBC (×1013/L)4.3 ± 0.64.3 ± 0.60.985
 WBC (×109/L)11.1 ± 3.410.0 ± 4.00.040
 Monocyte (×109/L)0.6 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.30.537
 Neutrophil (×109/L)9.3 ± 3.38.0 ± 4.00.012
 ALT (U/L)23.1 ± 21.022.9 ± 23.00.958
 AST (U/L)21.9 ± 11.121.7 ± 17.50.934
 GGT (U/L)26.9 ± 28.525.4 ± 30.70.552
 ADA (U/L)9.3 ± 2.99.5 ± 3.60.553
 TBIL (μmol/L)15.5 ± 9.016.6 ± 8.70.368
 LDH (U/L)184.0 ± 45.4167.2 ± 44.70.681
 ALP (U/L)69.8 ± 24.167.7 ± 20.70.502
 TP (g/L)62.6 ± 7.764.1 ± 8.10.137
 A/G1.4 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.30.648
 ALB (g/L)35.6 ± 4.737.0 ± 5.20.039
 CHOL (mmol/L)4.6 ± 1.04.9 ± 1.20.066
 TG (mmol/L)1.2 ± 0.61.2 ± 0.80.470
 HDL (mmol/L)1.2 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.40.005
 LDL (mmol/L)2.6 ± 0.82.8 ± 0.90.054
 UA (μmol/L)208.2 ± 118.0206.5 ± 101.70.915
 PT (s)10.6 ± 1.310.8 ± 1.60.261
 FIB (/L)3.3 ± 1.03.3 ± 0.90.833
 TT (s)14.5 ± 2.514.2 ± 2.30.444
Intraoperative data
 Posterior circulation (N, %)2 (2.9%)14 (4.7%)0.752
 Diameter of aneurysm (N, %)8.6 ± 7.08.4 ± 7.00.859
 Diameter ≥ 10 mm (N, %)24 (35.3%)95 (32.0%)0.600
 Number of aneurysm (N)1.1 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.30.611
 Multiple (N, %)7 (10.3%)27 (9.1%)0.758
 Rupture before sugery (N, %)56 (82.4%)205 (69.0%)0.028
 Blood loss in operation (ml)308.4 ± 249.0293.7 ± 296.90.673
 Transfusion in operation (N, %)3 (4.4%)14 (4.7%)0.915
Postoperative outcomes   
 CTA before discharge22 (32.4%)123 (41.4%)0.168
 LOS (days)21.6 ± 18.917.0 ± 9.50.004
 Death (N, %)7 (10.3%)4 (1.3%)<0.001

BMI: body mass index; NRS2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002; ACEI: ACE inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB: calcium channel blocker; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI: proton pump inhibitors; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; Scr: serum creatinine; Hb: hemoglobin; PLT: platelet; RBC: red blood cell; WBC: white blood cell; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; ADA: adenosine deaminase; TBIL: total bilirubin; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; TP: total protein; A/G: albumin/globulin ratio; ALB: albumin; CHOL: cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; UA: uric acid; PT: prothrombin time; FIB: fibrinogen; TT: thrombin time; LOS: length of stay; CTA: computed tomography angiography.

Baseline characteristics of AKI and non-AKI. BMI: body mass index; NRS2002: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002; ACEI: ACE inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CCB: calcium channel blocker; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PPI: proton pump inhibitors; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; Scr: serum creatinine; Hb: hemoglobin; PLT: platelet; RBC: red blood cell; WBC: white blood cell; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; ADA: adenosine deaminase; TBIL: total bilirubin; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; TP: total protein; A/G: albumin/globulin ratio; ALB: albumin; CHOL: cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; UA: uric acid; PT: prothrombin time; FIB: fibrinogen; TT: thrombin time; LOS: length of stay; CTA: computed tomography angiography. Moreover, patients with AKI showed a longer length of stay during hospitalization (21.6 ± 18.9 vs 17.0 ± 9.5 days, p < 0.05) and higher mortality (10.3% vs 1.3%, p < 0.05) compared with Non-AKI patients, which means patients with AKI were related to poor prognosis after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery.

Predictors of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping

Univariate logistic regression revealed that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), high density lipoprotein (HDL), prothrombin time (PT), size of aneurysm ≥10 mm, and aneurysm ruptured before surgery were associated with AKI after surgery. To obtain the best predictors of AKI in patients with intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery, we performed multivariate logistic regression in which forward stepwise regression was used (Table 2). According to the OR in multivariate logistic regression, the high risk factors of AKI were size of aneurysm ≥10 mm (OR 2.007, CI 1.030–3.911; p < 0.05) and rupture (OR 3.501, CI 1.493–8.210; p < 0.05). These results indicated that patients with their aneurysm ≥10 mm were 1.007-fold more likely to develop AKI, and the probability of developing AKI in patients with ruptured aneurysm was 2.501 times compared with patients without ruptured aneurysm after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. And patients with higher eGFR, PT, and HDL were less likely to develop postoperative AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping.
Table 2.

Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression.

VariablesUnivariate logistic regression
Multivariate logistic regression
βOR (95%CI)p ValueβOR (95%CI)p Value
Diabetes mellitus (N, %)0.45851.582 (0.394,6.353)0.517   
eGFR (ml/min/1.732)−0.06110.941 (0.920,0.962)<0.001−0.99690.369 (0.248,0.550)<0.001
Glucose (mmol/L)−0.01410.986 (0.807,1.204)0.890   
WBC (×109/L)−0.66410.515 (0.224,1.180)0.116   
Neutrophil (×109/L)0.74092.097 (0.953,4.613)0.065   
ALB (g/L)0.07811.081 (0.736,1.588)0.690   
HDL (mmol/L)−3.32220.039 (0.006,0.275)0.001−0.49450.609 (0.467,0.796)<0.001
PT (s)−0.78000.458 (0.298,0.704)0.003−0.67100.511 (0.305,0.857)0.011
Rupture before sugery (N, %)1.5594.757 (1.563,14.480)0.0061.25313.501 (1.493,8.210)0.004
Diameter ≥ 10 mm1.9246.850 (1.765,26.576)0.0050.69652.007 (1.030,3.911)0.041
Univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression.

Establishment and validation of nomogram

Based on the results of multivariate logistic regression, a visual predictive nomogram of AKI patients after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery was constructed, and each predictive factor had a relevant point which was calculated according to its regression coefficients. Then an internal validation was performed using a bootstrapping technique with 1000 resamples, and the Harrell C-Index was used to further evaluate the discrimination ability of the model and to reduce overfitting bias. The C-Index was 0.796 (SD = 0.018, 95% CI 0.795–0.797) for the primary cohort and 0.789 (SD = 0.015, 95% CI 0.788–0.790) for the bootstrapping cohort. Moreover, calibration plots showed good consistency with the actual presence of AKI (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Calibration plots of internal validation. The nomogram demonstrated a good accuracy in estimating intracranial aneurysm clipping associated AKI, as a C-Index and a bootstrap-corrected one of 0.772 and 0.737, respectively.

Calibration plots of internal validation. The nomogram demonstrated a good accuracy in estimating intracranial aneurysm clipping associated AKI, as a C-Index and a bootstrap-corrected one of 0.772 and 0.737, respectively. At last, the nomogram (Figure 3) showed that aneurysm diameter ≥10 mm and ruptured aneurysm were the largest contributors of AKI after surgery, while patients who had higher HDL, prothrombin time (PT) or eGFR were at a lower risk in AKI developing.
Figure 3.

Nomogram of predictors based on multivariate regression analysis. Locate patient’s values on each axis to obtain the predicted probability of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. Draw a vertical line toward the ‘Points’ axis to determine the points of each variable, sum the points and locate on ‘Total Points’ axis. Draw a vertical line toward the ‘Risk of AKI’ axis to find the possibility of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. The predicted range of AKI was from 5% to 90%.

Nomogram of predictors based on multivariate regression analysis. Locate patient’s values on each axis to obtain the predicted probability of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. Draw a vertical line toward the ‘Points’ axis to determine the points of each variable, sum the points and locate on ‘Total Points’ axis. Draw a vertical line toward the ‘Risk of AKI’ axis to find the possibility of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery. The predicted range of AKI was from 5% to 90%.

Discussion

Postoperative AKI continues to be a feared consequence of surgery, it is relatively common in cardiac surgery and has short- and long-term survival implications. Previous studies demonstrated that the incidence of need for dialysis was 1.9% in AKI patients after cardiac surgery [12], and those who had a temporary recovery of renal function by the time of hospital discharge still had a high risk of death for up to 10 years [13]. Given this condition, the focus of clinicians is still on prevention and risk factor management. However, without convenient and reliable means of measuring real-time renal blood flow and the kidney histopathologic level, it is indeed confusing in detecting AKI after surgery, therefore, we established a nomogram model to serve as a promising predictive tool to improve the identification of AKI. In this study, we found that aneurysm rupture before surgery a risk factor to predict AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping. Rupture of aneurysm will cause subarachnoid hemorrhage and studies revealed that intrathecal secretion of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1,IL-6 and TNF-α, was significantly increased in these patients with poor clinical outcome [14,15], they hypothesized that an overwhelming inflammatory response in the subarachnoid space plays a central part in pathogenesis of vasospasms and subsequent cerebral ischemia [15]. Studies also found that IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α generated by renal tubule cells after ischemic injury of kidney, could activate inflammatory cells [16], recruited inflammatory cells further release a broad range of inflammatory cytokines, which would increase further injury and fibrosis [17,18]. Whether there is a connection between ruptured aneurysm after intracranial aneurysm clipping and acute kidney injury AKI through the cytokines still need further research. Besides, patients with ruptured aneurysm may require more frequent radiographic studies and interventions with contrast agent, which may increase the risks of AKI. Size of aneurysms as a risk factor to predict rupture of intracranial aneurysm was widely reported but still controversial. Rinkel et al. [19] revealed higher rupture risk in aneurysms larger than 10 mm compared with that were smaller than 10 mm while Cezary et al. [20] claimed just the opposite. On the other side, Beck et al. [21] found that neither height nor width of the aneurysm are significant parameters correlated with the risk of aneurysm rupture. These different results could be due to regional and ethnic differences. In this study, we found aneurysms larger than 10 mm a predictor of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping, since there are no relevant studies about the size of aneurysm and AKI, we assume that those larger than 10 mm are more likely to rupture in this study, thus leading to the occurrence of AKI as mentioned above. Intriguingly, we found that ruptured aneurysm and aneurysm size ≥10 mm are risk factors for patients with intracranial clipping surgery, and blood pressure should be controlled at a relatively low level in these two conditions. However, intraoperative hypotension may substantially contribute to postoperative AKI caused by reduced renal perfusion. A retrospective analysis have reported that a mean arterial pressure less than 55 mmHg could predict adverse renal-related outcomes after noncardiac surgery [22] and the decrease of intraoperative systolic blood pressure was also associated with postoperative AKI in cardiac surgery [23]. But another analysis found that the relationship between hypotension and acute kidney injury was determined by underlying patient and procedural risk, patients with low risk demonstrated no associated increased risk of acute kidney injury across all blood pressure ranges [24]. In this condition, whether intraoperative hypotension is a confounding factor between ruptured bigger aneurysm and AKI still remains controversial, therefore, further researches are still needed in the future. Nomogram, a single numerical estimate of the probability of an event, has shown better performance than other options of accurate estimates of the likelihood of treatment success, complications and long-term morbidity [25]. Our study is the first to establish a nomogram to predict the risk of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery, which can provide clinical guidance for the early identification and intervention of patients with high risk. Our study had several limitations. First of all, this was a single-center retrospective study, the stability of the model should be evaluated before applied to other population. Secondly, the diagnosis and staging of AKI based on urinary criteria according to KDIGO criteria (urine volume < 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h) was not adopted in this study, which may influence the diagnosis and staging of AKI, thus underestimating the occurrence of AKI. Thirdly, as a retrospective study, some indicators such as contrast agent, blood pressure etc. were not available due to the missing data, this may cause bias to some extent, thus needing further research in the future.

Conclusion

In conclusion, HDL, PT, eGFR, aneurysm ≥10 mm, and rupture score are predictors of AKI after intracranial aneurysm clipping. Besides, we established a novel nomogram model based on the predictive factors above to predict AKI. This model can serve as a promising predictive tool to improve the identification of AKI among those who underwent intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery.
  24 in total

1.  Comparison and clinical suitability of eight prediction models for cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Harmke D Kiers; Mark van den Boogaard; Micha C J Schoenmakers; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Henry A van Swieten; Suzanne Heemskerk; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Elisabeth Burdick; Melissa Honour; Joseph V Bonventre; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Inflammatory cytokines in subarachnoid haemorrhage: association with abnormal blood flow velocities in basal cerebral arteries.

Authors:  K Fassbender; B Hodapp; S Rossol; T Bertsch; J Schmeck; S Schütt; M Fritzinger; P Horn; P Vajkoczy; S Kreisel; J Brunner; P Schmiedek; M Hennerici
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Joseph V Bonventre; Li Yang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  G J Rinkel; M Djibuti; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Risk factors of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: development and validation of a perioperative predictive nomogram.

Authors:  Chen Guan; Chenyu Li; Lingyu Xu; Li Zhen; Yue Zhang; Long Zhao; Bin Zhou; Lin Che; Yanfei Wang; Yan Xu
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  Can nomograms be superior to other prediction tools?

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Capitanio; Claudio Jeldres; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Perioperative acute kidney injury.

Authors:  O Goren; I Matot
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Acute kidney injury is associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Charles E Hobson; Sinan Yavas; Mark S Segal; Jesse D Schold; Curtis G Tribble; A Joseph Layon; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury after Coil Embolization for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Hyun Goo Lee; Won Ki Kim; Je Young Yeon; Jong Soo Kim; Keon Ha Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Seung Chyul Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  Dandan Guo; Huifang Wang; Xiaoying Lai; Junying Li; Demin Xie; Li Zhen; Chunhui Jiang; Min Li; Xuemei Liu
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.