| Literature DB >> 33114238 |
Yaregal Awoke1,2, Yonas Chebude2, Isabel Díaz1.
Abstract
Ordered mesoporous materials have attracted considerable attention due to their potential applications in catalysis, adsorption, and separation technologies, as well as biomedical applications. In the present manuscript, we aim at a rational design to obtain the desired surface functionality (Ti and/or hydrophobic groups) while obtaining short channels (short diffusion paths) and large pore size (>10 nm). Santa Barbara Amorphous material SBA-15 and periodic mesoporous organosilica PMO materials are synthesized using Pluronic PE 10400 (P104) surfactant under mild acidic conditions to obtain hexagonal platelet-like particles with very short mesochannels (300-450 nm). The use of expanders, such as 1, 3, 5-trimethylbenzene (TMB) and 1, 3, 5-triisopropylbenzene (TIPB) were tested in order to increase the pore size. TMB yielded in the formation of vesicles in all the syntheses attempted, whereas P104 combined with TIPB resulted both in expanded (E) E-SBA-15 and E-PMO with 12.3 nm pore size short channel particles in both cases. Furthermore, the synthesis method was expanded to the incorporation of small amount of Ti via co-condensation method using titanocene as titanium source. As a result, Ti-E-SBA-15 was obtained with 15.5 nm pore size and isolated Ti-sites maintaining platelet hexagonal morphology. Ti-PMO was obtained with 7.8 nm and short channels, although the pore size under the tried synthesis conditions could not be expanded further without losing the structural ordering.Entities:
Keywords: PMO; SBA-15; particle morphology; pore size; surface hydrophobicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33114238 PMCID: PMC7660629 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25214909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) Low angle XRD pattern; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of “short” SBA-15 materials SBA-S and Ti-SBA-S.
Structural parameters of SBA-15 and periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMO) samples.
| Sample | ao (nm) | SBET (m2g−1) | V (cm3g−1) | DDFT (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA-S | 10.6 | 579 | 0.65 | 9 |
| Ti-SBA-S | 12.1 | 896 | 0.93 | 10.1 |
| E-SBA-S | 13.7 | 701 | 0.76 | 12.3 |
| Ti-E-SBA-S | 16.2 | 822 | 1.17 | 15.5 |
| PMO-S | 11.6 | 672 | 0.57 | 7.1 |
| Ti-PMO-S | 12 | 706 | 0.59 | 7.8 |
| E-PMO-S | 15.9 | 843 | 0.86 | 12.3 |
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of: (a) SBA-S; (b) Ti-SBA-S materials.
Figure 3(a) Low angle XRD patterns of expanded samples: M-SBA-S using TMB, and E-SBA-S and Ti-E-SBA-S using TIPB. Inset corresponds to the TEM image of M-SBA-S showing vesicles; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of E-SBA-S and Ti-E-SBA-S materials.
Figure 4TEM images of: (a) E-SBA-S and (b) Ti-E-SBA-S materials.
Figure 5Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of: (a) E-SBA-S; (b) Ti-E-SBA-S materials.
Figure 6(a) Low angle XRD patterns; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of PMO-S and Ti-PMO-S materials.
Figure 7Scanning electron micrographs of: (a) PMO-S; (b) Ti-PMO-S materials.
Figure 8(a) Low angle XRD patterns; (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of E-PMO-S.
Figure 9Structure and morphology of large pore size E-PMO-S material (a) TEM and (b) SEM images.