| Literature DB >> 33113886 |
Salvador Márquez-Reina1, Inmaculada Palomo-Toucedo2, María Reina-Bueno2, José Manuel Castillo-López2, Javier Ramos Ortega2, César Calvo-Lobo3, Daniel López-López4, Gabriel Domínguez-Maldonado2.
Abstract
Background: Onychocryptosis is one of the most prevailing onychopathies and one of the usual reasons for visiting podiatry clinics. In this research, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a procedure of nail reeducation technique via a strip of polyethylene in subjects with stage I or IIa onychocryptosis, in which pathological toenail curves are present.Entities:
Keywords: nail brace; nail curves; onychocryptosis; orthonyxia; spicule
Year: 2020 PMID: 33113886 PMCID: PMC7660184 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217741
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Strip of polyethylene treatment in ingrown toenails.
Figure 2Initial appearance of the 1st toenail.
Figure 3Appearance at 6 months.
Figure 4Appearance at 12 months.
Recurrence data of ingrown toenails in both groups.
| Treatment Period | Follow-Up Period | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Recurrence | Recurrence | No Recurrence | Recurrence | |
| Experimental Group | 33 (71.74%) | 13 (28.26%) | 36 (78.26%) | 10 (21.74%) |
| Control Group | 2 (4.17%) | 46 (95.83%) | 4 (8.33%) | 44 (91.67%) |
Descriptive parameters of the nail width measurements in the experimental group.
| Initial Nail Width | Nail Width after 2 Months | Nail Width after 4 Months | Nail Width after 6 Months | Nail Width after 12 Months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 12.86 ± 2.70 | 13.88 ± 2.55 | 14.41 ± 2.57 | 15.01 ± 2.67 | 14.03 ± 2.57 |
| Minimum | 4.83 | 6.20 | 6.88 | 7.04 | 5.49 |
| Maximum | 16.78 | 17.60 | 17.98 | 18.25 | 17.52 |
All measurements are in millimeters.
Studies of the effectiveness of other nail brace techniques and nail reeducation techniques.
| Nail Brace Techniques | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studies | Year | Nº Cases | Treatment Time | Follow-Up Time | Effectiveness Rate |
| Van Oirschot et al. [ | 1994 | 85 | Average 9 sessions | - | 76.5% * |
| Kim and Sim [ | 2003 | 14 | 1 month | 12 months | 100% |
| Harrer et al. [ | 2005 | 21 | - | 6–12 months | 81% * |
| Erdogan [ | 2008 | 7 | - | 6 months | 100% |
| Iribarren and Delgado [ | 2006 | 10 | - | - | 100% |
| Cabo and Macián [ | 2007 | - | 141 days | - | 82% * |
| Erdogan and Erdogan [ | 2006 | 21 | 4.1 ± 2.36 months | 2 years | 71.4% * |
| Kruijff et al. [ | 2008 | 47 | - | 12 months | 82.98% * |
| Ishibashi et al. [ | 2008 | 14 | - | 3 months | 100% |
| Kim and Park [ | 2009 | 31 | 3 weeks | 13.3 ± 4.9 months | 93.55% |
| Moriue et al. [ | 2008 | 5 | - | >6 months | 100% |
| Matsumoto et al. [ | 2010 | 61 | 9.3 months | 10 months | 91.8% |
| Erdogan [ | 2011 | 21 | 6–10 months | - | 100% |
| Okada and Okada [ | 2012 | 106 | ≥5 days | 4.6 months (range 2–12 months) | 92.45% |
| Moon et al. [ | 2013 | 15 | - | 9 months (range 5–12 months) | 86.67% |
| Tseng et al. [ | 2013 | 43 | 2–3 months | 6 months | 95.35% |
| Kim et al. [ | 2013 | 21 | 2–3 weeks | Foreseen: 12 weeks | 90.5% (12 weeks) |
| Park et al. [ | 2014 | 31 | From 2–3 weeks or more (41 days) | 161 days | 77.4% * |
| Guler et al. [ | 2015 | 74 | Until cure and correction nail curve | 12.7 ± 3.9 months | 91.9% |
| Arik et al. [ | 2016 | 41 | 4–6 weeks | Range 6–12 months (8.6 ± 2.1 months) | 80.5% * |
| This study | 46 | 6 months | 6 months | 78.26% * | |
|
| |||||
| Lloyd-Davies and Brill [ | 1963 | 100 | - | 2 years | 60% * |
| Wallace et al. [ | 1979 | Study 1 (retrospective): 25. | 6 weeks10–12 weeks | 6 months | 52% (retrospective study) * |
| Cameron [ | 1981 | 100 | 3.5–4 months | 6 months | 61% * |
| Senapati [ | 1986 | 25 | - | 2–56 weeks (of 23.7 ± 14.3 weeks) | 79% * |
| Connolly and Fitzgerald [ | 1988 | 61 | - | 2.5 years | 72% * |
| Reijnen y Goris [ | 1989 | Stage I: 20 | From 2 weeks until pain disappeared | 2 years | 96% (stage I and II) * |
| Ilfeld [ | 1991 | 43 | - | - | 97.68% * |
| Salasche et al. [ | 1998 | 62 | - | 2 years | 100% * |
| Lazar et al. [ | 1999 | 20 | 3–9 weeks | - | 95% * |
| You et al. [ | 2001 | 27 | - | 6 months | 37% * |
| Gupta et al. [ | 2001 | 39 | - | 6 months | 79.5% * |
| Abby et al. [ | 2002 | 28 | - | 4 months | 71.4% * |
| Kim et al. [ | 2003 | Group 1: 28 | Group 1: 3 days | 1 year | 92.8% (treatment of 3 days) * |
| Ozawa et al. [ | 2005 | 9 | 2 weeks | 6–37 months (average 17.7 months) | 89.89% * |
| Nazari [ | 2006 | 32 | 7–15 days | 6 months | 93.75% * |
| Lee et al. [ | 2011 | 30 | - | Average 8.42 months | 60% * |
| Doğan et al. [ | 2013 | 16 | 2 weeks | 6 months | 100% * |
| Ceren et al. [ | 2013 | 57 | 15 days | 6 months | 87.8% * |
| AlGhamdi and Khurram [ | 2014 | 23 | 1 months | 6 months | 80% * |
| Taheri et al. [ | 2014 | 11 | ≥4 weeks | 5 months | 81.82% * |
| Gutiérrez-Mendoza et al. [ | 2015 | 10 | 2 months | 2 months | 80% * |
| This study | 46 | 6 months | 6 months | 78.26% * | |
Note: * The results of this study and those that are close to it.
Studies of spicule technique effectiveness and the nail curve correction with nail reeducation techniques.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maeda et al. [ | 1990 | 22 | 15.9 months (range 3–48 months) | 6 months | 22.73% |
| Stoduto and Palomo [ | 2014 | 32 | - | - | 90.62% |
| This study | 48 | 6 months | 6 months | 8.33% | |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Di Chiacchio et al. [ | 2006 | 25 | 3.04 mm | Index of nail width increases and index of height decreases after treatment | |
| Lee et al. [ | 2011 | 30 | - | - | |
| Kim et al. [ | 2013 | 21 | - | Transversal nail width decreases and width index is maintained after treatment. | |
| This study | 46 | 1.8798 mm | Nail width mean decreases in the follow-up period (without orthonyxia). Tendency to increase nail curve. | ||