| Literature DB >> 33113807 |
Isabel María Fernández-Medina1, María Dolores Ruíz-Fernández1, José Manuel Hernández-Padilla1,2, José Granero-Molina1,3, Cayetano Fernández-Sola1,3, María Del Mar Jiménez-Lasserrotte1, María-Jesús Lirola4, Alda Elena Cortés-Rodríguez1, María Mar López-Rodríguez1.
Abstract
University is a period in which students can experience a considerable amount of challenges that may influence their health lifestyles. The aim of this article is to discover the role of therapeutic adherence to the Mediterranean diet and self-efficacy as mediators in the relationship between sleep quality and the average grades of nursing students. The sample was made up of 334 nursing students, with a mean age of 21.84 years (SD = 6.24). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality questionnaires, adherence to the Mediterranean diet and the Baessler and Shwarzer General Self-efficacy Scale were administered. The results of the multiple mediational model determined that quality of sleep has a direct influence on academic performance. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and quality of sleep have an effect on the degree of self-efficacy of nursing students. This study demonstrates that good sleep quality and adherence to the Mediterranean diet improve academic performance in nursing students. Future research should include multicenter longitudinal studies.Entities:
Keywords: Baessler and Schwarzer general self-efficacy scale; Mediterranean diet; Pittsburgh sleep quality index; academic performance; adherence to the Mediterranean diet; nursing students; self-efficacy; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33113807 PMCID: PMC7692202 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive and bivariate correlations between the different variables under study.
| Variables | N | M (DT) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Sleep quality index | 284 | 6.66 (3.59) | - | −0.13 * | −0.28 ** | −0.18 ** |
| 2. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet | 334 | 6.35 (1.74) | - | 0.12 * | −0.06 | |
| 3. Self-efficacy | 334 | 29.41 (5.04) | - | 0.08 | ||
| 4. Average score of the academic grade | 334 | 7.12 (0.91) | - |
** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Descriptive average academic grade, according to sleep quality and adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
| Variables | N | M | DT | t |
| d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep Quality Index | Good sleeper | 128 | 7.37 | 0.85 | 3.42 | 0.001 ** | 0.35 |
| Poor sleeper | 152 | 7.02 | 0.88 | ||||
| Adherence to Mediterranean Diet. | Good adherence | 35 | 6.64 | 1.32 | 3.32 | 0.001 ** | 0.53 |
| Poor adherence | 299 | 7.18 | 0.84 |
** p < 0.001.
Figure 1MMultiple model of mediation of adherence to the Mediterranean diet and self-efficacy in the relationship between the quality of sleep and the average grades of the students. X = independent variable; M1 = moderating variable 1; M2 = moderating variable 2; Y = dependent variable; a1= effect sleep quality on adherence to Mediterranean diet; b1= effect adherence to Mediterranean diet on average grade; a1 = effect sleep quality on self-efficacy; b2= effect self-efficacy on average grade; d21= effect adherence to Mediterranean diet on self-efficacy; c’ = direct effect of X on Y with M1 and M2; c = total effect of X on Y; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Total, direct and indirect effect: multiple model of mediation.
| Effects | B | SE | t |
| CI (95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect X Y | −0.357 | 0.104 | −3.426 | 0.000 | (−0.562; −0.152) |
| Direct effect X Y | −0.318 | 0.108 | −2.937 | 0.003 | (−0.532; −0.152) |
| Ind 1 X M1 Y | 0.00 | 0.00 | (−0.015; 0.025) | ||
| Ind 2 X M2 Y | −0.03 | 0.02 | (−0.111; 0.011) | ||
| Ind 3 X M1 M2 Y | −0.00 | 0.00 | (−0.004; 0.002) |
X (Sleep Quality) = dependent variable; Y (average academic grade) = independent variable; M1 (adherence to the Mediterranean diet) = moderating variable 1; M2 (self-efficacy) = moderator variable 2; Ind = indirect effect; B = non-standardized regression coefficient; SE = standard error; t = student’s t; CI: confidence interval.