Literature DB >> 33113119

Multidimensional Analysis of Risk Factors for the Severity and Mortality of Patients with COVID-19 and Diabetes.

Juan Huang1,2, Lin Zhu3, Xiangli Bai4, Xiong Jia1, Yajing Lu5, Aiping Deng6, Juyi Li6, Si Jin7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is one of the most common comorbidities of COVID-19. We aimed to conduct a multidimensional analysis of risk factors associated with the severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.
METHODS: In this retrospective study involving 1443 patients with COVID-19, we analyzed the clinical and laboratory characteristics and risk factors associated with disease severity in patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. The 84-day survival duration for critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes who had different levels of leukocytes and neutrophils, or treated with immunoglobulin or not, was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
RESULTS: Of the 1443 patients with COVID-19, 256 (17.7%) had diabetes, had a median age of 66.0 [IQR 58.0-73.8] years, and were more likely to develop severe (41.8% vs. 35.6%) and critical disease (34.0% vs. 14.9%), followed by higher mortality (21.1% vs. 7.0%), than those without diabetes. Higher levels of leukocytes (> 5.37 × 109/L), older age, and comorbid cerebrovascular disease and chronic renal disease independently contributed to in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Leukocytes > 5.37 × 109/L and the application of immunoglobulin were associated with shorter survival duration and lower mortality, respectively, in critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be paid to patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, especially when they have high leukocyte counts (> 5.37 × 109/L). Timely and adequate intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) use may reduce the mortality of critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes mellitus; Immunoglobulin; Prognosis; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2020        PMID: 33113119      PMCID: PMC7591692          DOI: 10.1007/s40121-020-00359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Ther        ISSN: 2193-6382


Key Summary Points

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to 10.6084/m9.figshare.12968201.

Introduction

The spread of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has reached pandemic levels and poses a threat of increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. By July 30, 2020, the virus had caused 87,830 confirmed cases and 4665 deaths in China and cases have also been reported in Africa, the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, Southeast Asia, the Western Pacific, and other regions. The disease severity varies from mild self-limiting flu-like illness to fulminant pneumonia, respiratory failure, and death. Patients with comorbidities are more likely to develop severe disease and subsequently death, although the overall mortality rate of COVID-19 is low (1.4–2.3%) [1, 2]. The high incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) globally makes this particularly concerning as the COVID-19 pandemic progresses. A study in China showed that the most common comorbidities were diabetes (22.0%) and cerebrovascular disease in 32 non-survivors from a group of 52 intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 [3]. The overall fatality rate was 2.3% in patients with COVID-19, but was increased to 7.3% in people with diabetes, as demonstrated by a recent summary report from the Chinese Center for Disease Control of 72,314 cases across the country [2]. Therefore, further investigations about COVID-19 cases are necessary to elaborate the prognostic risk factors and effective treatment measures for those with comorbid diabetes, and consequently to help identify risk factors for COVID-19. In the present study, 1443 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled, 256 of whom had DM. In addition to discussing the effect of DM on the morbidity, disease characteristics, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19, our study further conducted multidimensional analyses to explore the risk factors associated with severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 with or without DM, to provide useful clinical information for the decision of treatment options for patients with COVID-19 and DM.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

For this retrospective, single­center study, we collected the medical records of 1443 patients in Chinese from January 1 to March 24, 2020, at the Central Hospital of Wuhan, which is a designated hospital to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The enrolled patients in this study were all diagnosed with COVID-19 according to the World Health Organization (WHO) interim guidelines [4] and had a definite outcome (death or hospital discharge). The study was approved by the Wuhan Central Hospital ethics committee, and written informed consent was waived by the ethics commission because of the retrospective nature of this study. Diabetes was ascertained through a diabetes diagnosis in medical records or a self-reported diagnosis confirmed by medical records reviewed by endocrinologists. Diabetes was defined according to the WHO diagnostic criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (≥ 126 mg/dL) or 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (≥ 200 mg/dL). Diabetes was initially treated as a categorical variable (yes vs. no), and subsequently we divided the patients with diabetes or without diabetes into three subgroups (moderate, severe, and critical, respectively) according to the severity of the disease to elaborate the risk factors related to disease severity [5]. Briefly, moderate grade was defined as fever, respiratory symptoms, and changes on lung CT scans; severe grade was defined as respiratory rate ≥ 30 breaths per min, blood oxygen saturation ≤ 93%, oxygenation index ≤ 300 mmHg, and/or lung infiltrates increased > 50% within 24–48 h; and critical grade was defined as respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure. In order to demonstrate the risk factors of death, we sorted the critically ill patients into two groups according to the disease outcome (survival or non-survival). The patients with diabetes in our study were those with confirmed diabetes prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection, excluding those with newly diagnosed diabetes during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Data Collection

The epidemiological, demographic, clinical symptoms and signs, laboratory findings, management, and outcome data were obtained from the electronic medical records system of the Central Hospital of Wuhan. Laboratory validation of SARS-CoV-2 was performed at the Central Hospital of Wuhan [6]. The severity of COVID-19 was defined according to the diagnostic and treatment guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 issued by the Chinese National Health Committee (Version 5) [5].

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages (%), and continuous variables are summarized using median and interquartile range (IQR) values. Categorical variables between groups were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using Students’s t test for normally distributed data or the Mann–Whitney U test for nonnormal distributed data. Factors related to disease severity of patients were analyzed by an ordered logistic regression model. A binary logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the potential risk factors associated with the composite endpoints, with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) being reported. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the cutoff point for the risk factors for death. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to compare the 84-day survival rate for critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes by the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Involved Patients

A total of 1443 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in our study, 256 of whom had diabetes (17.74%). Patients with diabetes were older (66.0 [IQR 58.0–73.8] vs. 53.0 [IQR 37.0–66.0]) and had higher frequencies of cerebrovascular disease (23.4% vs. 6.8%), coronary heart disease (23.8% vs. 8.2%), heart failure (3.9% vs. 1.7%), hypertension (68.0% vs. 26.0%), digestive disorder (36.7% vs. 29.7%, including gastritis, gastric ulcer, and duodenal ulcer), COPD (4.7% vs. 2.2%), solid tumor (6.6% vs. 3.5%), and chronic renal disease (14.8% vs. 3.3%). The most common symptom for both groups was fever (63.8%), followed by cough (47.8%). Fatigue and chest tightness were less common. Patients with diabetes had more fever (85.9% vs. 66.3%) and felt sick and vomiting (7.8% vs. 4.5%). According to chest CT images, 181 (70.7%) patients with diabetes showed bilateral pneumonia, and the incidence was higher than that of those without diabetes [739 (62.3%)]. Major laboratory markers were tracked on admission. The blood test results of all patients on the day of hospital admission showed normal leukocyte counts. Patients with diabetes had higher levels of leukocytes and neutrophils and lower levels of lymphocytes and monocytes. Moreover, C-reactive protein (CRP), another indicator of inflammation, was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes (2.6 [IQR 0.5–5.5] vs. 0.7 [IQR 0.1–3.0]). These data showed that patients with COVID-19 and diabetes have a higher inflammatory state. Hemoglobin was below the normal range in all patients, and the hemoglobin and albumin level and albumin-to-globulin ratios were lower in patients with diabetes. Indicators of coagulation function disorder and organ dysfunction were more serious in patients with diabetes. These results indicated that organ dysfunction and metabolic disorders were more obvious in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes, which may signify a poorer prognosis of COVID-19. Patients with diabetes had a greater occurrence of septic shock (3.5% vs. 1.0%) and ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome, 25.0% vs. 11.5%) and were more likely to develop severe (41.8% vs. 35.6%) and critical (34.0% vs. 14.9%) disease. Moreover, patients with pre-existing diabetes received significantly more intensive integrated treatments to manage their symptoms of COVID-19 than those without diabetes. Antibiotics, antifungal drugs, glucocorticoids, and invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation were more widely used in patients with diabetes, who had longer hospital stays (22.5 [IQR 15–34.8] vs. 16 [IQR 10–24]) and higher mortality (21.1% vs. 7.0%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 with or without diabetes

CharacteristicDiabetes (n = 256)Without diabetes (n = 1187)P
Age, median (IQR), years66.0 (58.0–73.8)53.0 (37.0–66.0)0.000
Gender, %
 Female125 (48.8)650 (54.8)0.084
 Male131 (51.2)537 (45.2)
Clinical symptoms, %
 Fever134 (85.9)787 (66.3)0.000
 Cough123 (48.0)567 (47.8)0.935
 Fatigue46 (18.0)192 (16.2)0.483
 Chest pain4 (1.6)28 (2.4)0.433
 Chest tightness48 (18.8)171 (14.4)0.079
 Diarrhea10 (3.9)69 (5.8)0.224
 Headache10 (3.9)57 (4.8)0.537
 Feel sick and vomit20 (7.8)53 (4.5)0.027
 Shortness of breath41 (16.0)159 (13.4)0.271
Chronic disease, %
 Cerebrovascular disease60 (23.4)81 (6.8)0.000
 Coronary heart disease61 (23.8)97 (8.2)0.000
 Heart failure10 (3.9)20 (1.7)0.024
 Hypertension174 (68.0)309 (26.0)0.000
 Digestive disorder94 (36.7)353 (29.7)0.028
 COPD12 (4.7)26 (2.2)0.024
 Solid tumor17 (6.6)42 (3.5)0.033
 Chronic renal disease38 (14.8)39 (3.3)0.000
 Hepatitis3 (1.2)14 (1.2)1.000
Complications, %
 Acute liver injury38 (14.8)172 (14.5)0.884
 Septic shock9 (3.5)12 (1.0)0.006
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome64 (25.0)136 (11.5)0.000
Lung CT images, %
 Unilateral pneumonia36 (14.1)264 (22.2)0.003
 Bilateral pneumonia181 (70.7)739 (62.3)0.011
 Normal39 (15.2)184 (15.5)0.915
 Multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity147 (57.4)655 (55.2)0.513
Treatment strategies, %
 Antibiotics222 (86.7)924 (77.8)0.001
 Antiviral drugs240 (93.8)1103 (92.9)0.637
 Antifungal agents12 (4.7)17 (1.4)0.001
 Glucocorticoids147 (57.4)545 (45.9)0.001
 Immunoglobulin49 (19.1)250 (21.1)0.492
 Invasive mechanical ventilation36 (14.1)61 (5.1)0.000
 Noninvasive mechanical ventilation50 (19.5)104 (8.8)0.000
Hospital stays, median (IQR), days22.5 (15.0–34.8)16.0 (10.0–24.0)0.000
Severity of illness, %
 Moderate62 (24.2)552 (46.5)0.000
 Severe illness107 (41.8)458 (35.6)
 Critical severe illness87 (34.0)177 (14.9)
Clinical outcomes, %
 Rehabilitation discharge202 (78.9)1104 (93.0)0.000
 Died54 (21.1)83 (7.0)
Blood biochemical parameters, median (IQR)
 Leukocytes (3.5–9.5 × 109/L)5.7 (4.6–7.5)5.2 (4.1–6.6)0.010
 Neutrophils (1.8–6.3 × 109/L)4.0 (3.0–5.6)3.3 (2.4–4.5)0.000
 Lymphocytes (1.1–3.2 × 109/L)1.1 (0.7–1.5)1.3 (0.9–1.7)0.012
 Eosinophils (0.02–0.52 × 109/L)0.02 (0.00–0.09)0.03 (0.00–0.09)0.677
 Basophils (0–0.06 × 109/L)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.154
 Lymphocyte percentage (20–50%)18.8 (12.1–28.2)25.7 (16.4–34.2)0.000
 Neutrophil percentage (40–75%)71.8 (61.3–81.5)64.4 (55.4–75.6)0.000
 Monocyte percentage (3–10%)6.7 (4.9–8.4)7.2 (5.4–9.1)0.031
 Eosinophil percentage (0.4–8%)0.4 (0.0–1.6)0.6 (0.0–1.7)0.874
 Basophil percentage (0–1%)0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.350
 Platelets (125–350 × 109/L)188.0 (146.0–238.8)194.0 (153.0–244.0)0.408
 Hemoglobin (130–175 g/L)123.5 (111.0–136.0)129.0 (120.0–140.0)0.000
 Monocytes (0.1–0.6 × 109/L)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.383
 Activated partial thromboplastin time (20–40 s)27.7 (24.4–31.9)28.2 (25.3–31.1)0.688
 Fibrinogen (2–4 g/L)3.0 (2.5–3.6)2.7 (2.2–3.1)0.000
 Prothrombin time (9–13 s)11.6 (11.0–12.4)11.5 (11.0–12.0)0.012
 International normalized ratio (0.7–1.3)1.0 (0.9–1.1)1.0 (0.9–1.0)0.013
 D-dimer (0–1 μg/mL)0.9 (0.4–2.5)0.5 (0.2–1.3)0.025
 Albumin (40–55 g/L)36.9 (33.4–40.3)40.0 (36.5–43.4)0.000
 Globulin (20–40 g/L)28.3 (25.2–31.8)27.3 (24.2–30.8)0.136
 Albumin-to-globulin ratio (1.2–2.4)1.3 (1.1–1.5)1.5 (1.2–1.7)0.000
 Alanine aminotransferase (9–50 U/L)19.0 (12.8–31.5)20.2 (13.5–32.2)0.634
 Aspartate aminotransferase (15–40 U/L)20.9 (15.2–32.2)20.9 (16.0–29.3)0.934
 Total bilirubin (2–20.4 μmol/L)10.2 (7.0–14.0)9.6 (7.2–13.2)0.150
 Serum urea (1.7–8.3 mmol/L)5.1 (3.8–6.9)4.1 (3.2–5.1)0.000
 Serum creatinine (57–111 μmol/L)67.8 (53.4–89.5)65.1 (51.7–79.2)0.015
 Alkaline phosphatase (40–150 U/L)60.4 (50.0–62.0)60.4 (47.0–60.4)0.058
 Sodium ion (137–147 mmol/L)140.2 (137.0–142.0)140.2 (139.0–141.0)0.147
 Potassium ion (3.5–5.3 mmol/L)3.9 (3.6–4.1)3.9 (3.8–3.9)0.149
 Calcium ion (1.15–1.35 mmol/L)0.85 (0.73–0.99)0.85 (0.85–0.92)0.374
 Creatine kinase (38–174 U/L)88.0 (49.0–129.0)81.0 (49.0–125.1)0.711
 Lactate dehydrogenase (80–285 U/L)206.0 (162.3–244.0)185.0 (147.0–212.0)0.005
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme (12–68 U/L)22.3 (19.0–24.0)22.3 (19.9–23.4)0.916
 Creatine kinase isoenzyme (0–25 IU/L)9.3 (6.0–12.0)8.0 (6.0–9.8)0.166
 alpha-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (72–182 U/L)163.5 (126.0–194.0)145.0 (116.0–164.0)0.003
 γ-Glutamyltransferase (10–60 U/L)24.3 (16.2–41.8)22.0 (13.7–37.8)0.192
 B-type brain natriuretic peptide (< 125 pg/mL)162.0 (64.0–327.8)194.0 (31.7–327.8)0.203
 Troponin (< 0.03 μg/L)0.02 (0.01–0.07)0.01 (0.00–0.07)0.224
 Glucose (3.9–6.1 mmol/L)8.3 (6.1–11.6)5.2 (4.7–6.2)0.000
 Procalcitonin (< 0.04 ng/mL)0.08 (0.05–0.20)0.05 (0.04–0.10)0.966
 C-reactive protein (0–0.5 mg/dL)2.6 (0.5–5.5)0.7 (0.1–3.0)0.000
Viral nucleic acid (negative), %, test for the first time
 Negative180 (70.3)832 (70.1)0.944
 Positive76 (29.7)355 (29.9)

Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between patients with diabetes and those without diabetes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 with or without diabetes Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between patients with diabetes and those without diabetes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Risk Factors Associated with Disease Severity of Patients with COVID-19

To elaborate on the factors related to disease severity, we divided patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes into three subgroups: medium, severe, and critical (Table 2 and Table S1). As shown in Table 2, in both patients with and without diabetes, the disease severity increased with age, but there were no significant differences of age (P = 0.309) in the three subgroups of patients with diabetes; however, the difference was obvious in patients without diabetes (P = 0.000), as most patients under 40 years old had moderate disease, and with the increase of age, patients over 60 years old were more likely to develop critical disease. In patients without diabetes, the disease profile of female patients was mostly moderate to severe, while that of male patients was more likely to develop into critical disease.
Table 2

Risk factors of severity of patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes

Patients with diabetes (n = 256)Patients without diabetes (n = 1187)
Moderate (n = 62, 24.2%)Severe (n = 107, 41.8%)Critical (n = 87, 34.0%)PModerate (n = 552, 46.5%)Severe (n = 458, 38.6%)Critical (n = 177, 14.9%)P
Age, median (IQR), years64.5 (55.0–73.3)66.0 (59.0–73.0)67.0 (58.0–78.0)0.30943.0 (32.3–59.0)56.0 (40.0–67.0)66.0 (55.5–76.0)0.000
 Distribution (%)
  < 404 (6.5)5 (4.7)1 (1.1)0.176235 (42.6)111 (24.2)19 (10.7)0.000
  40–6021 (33.9)23 (21.5)24 (27.6)0.207196 (35.5)165 (36.0)44 (24.9)0.019
  > 6037 (59.7)79 (73.8)62 (71.3)0.142121 (21.9)182 (39.7)114 (64.4)0.000
Gender, %
 Female36 (58.1)54 (50.5)35 (40.2)0.090344 (62.3)237 (51.7)69 (39.0)0.000
 Male26 (41.9)53 (49.5)52 (59.8)208 (37.7)221 (48.3)108 (61.0)
Chronic disease, %
 Cerebrovascular disease10 (16.1)20 (18.7)30 (34.5)0.01120 (3.6)22 (4.8)39 (22.0)0.000
 Coronary heart disease9 (14.5)24 (22.4)28 (32.2)0.04026 (4.7)31 (6.8)40 (22.6)0.000
 Heart failure2 (3.2)3 (2.8)5 (5.7)0.5621 (0.2)2 (0.4)17 (9.6)0.000
 Hypertension43 (69.4)68 (63.6)63 (72.4)0.40699 (17.9)123 (26.9)87 (49.2)0.000
 Digestive disorder8 (12.9)44 (41.1)42 (48.3)0.000105 (19.0)155 (33.8)93 (52.5)0.000
 COPD0 (0)3 (2.8)9 (10.3)0.0033 (0.5)12 (2.6)11 (6.2)0.000
 Solid tumor2 (3.2)6 (5.6)9 (10.3)0.19415 (2.7)12 (2.6)15 (8.5)0.001
 Chronic renal disease4 (6.5)16 (15.0)18 (20.6)0.0556 (1.1)9 (2.0)24 (13.6)0.000
 Hepatitis1 (1.6)0 (0)2 (2.3)0.1863 (0.5)10 (2.2)1 (0.6)0.043
Complications, %
 Acute liver injury3 (4.8)10 (9.3)25 (28.7)0.00053 (9.6)73 (15.9)46 (26.0)0.000
 Septic shock0 (0)0 (0)9 (10.3)0.0000 (0)0 (0)13 (7.3)0.000
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome0 (0)0 (0)64 (73.6)0.0000 (0)0 (0)136 (76.8)0.000
Lung CT images, %
 Unilateral pneumonia12 (19.4)15 (14.0)12 (14.9)0.583159 (28.8)84 (18.3)18 (10.2)0.000
 Bilateral pneumonia44 (71.0)85 (79.4)52 (59.8)0.011284 (51.4)337 (73.6)118 (66.7)0.000
 Normal6 (9.7)7 (6.5)23 (26.4)0.000109 (19.7)37 (8.1)41 (23.2)0.000
 Multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity35 (56.5)82 (76.6)30 (34.5)0.000273 (49.5)291 (63.5)91 (51.4)0.000
Treatment strategies, %
 Antibiotics37 (59.7)100 (93.5)85 (97.7)0.000369 (66.8)385 (84.1)170 (96.0)0.000
 Antiviral drugs58 (93.5)106 (99.1)76 (87.4)0.002504 (91.3)437 (95.4)162 (91.5)0.013
 Glucocorticoids19 (30.6)62 (57.9)66 (75.9)0.000174 (31.5)235 (51.3)136 (76.8)0.000
 Immunoglobulin5 (8.1)19 (17.8)25 (28.7)0.00699 (17.9)96 (21.0)55 (31.1)0.001
 Invasive mechanical ventilation0 (0)0 (0)36 (41.4)0.0000 (0)0 (0)61 (34.5)0.000
 Noninvasive mechanical ventilation0 (0)0 (0)50 (57.5)0.0000 (0)0 (0)104 (58.8)0.000
Hospital stays, median (IQR), days16.0 (10.8–24.3)25.0 (19.0–35.0)22.0 (12.0–37.0)0.00113.0 (8.0–19.0)18.0 (13.0–26.0)22.0 (11.0–33.0)0.002
Blood biochemical parameters, median (IQR)
 Leukocytes (3.5–9.5 × 109/L)5.4 (4.7–6.4)5.7 (4.4–7.3)6.5 (4.6–9.6)0.0945.2 (4.0–6.3)5.1 (4.1–6.5)6.0 (4.4–8.8)0.000
 Neutrophils (1.8–6.3 × 109/L)3.3 (2.7–4.3)4.0 (2.9–5.4)4.8 (3.3–8.6)0.0003.0 (2.2–4.0)3.4 (2.4–4.6)4.5 (3.0–7.5)0.000
 Lymphocytes (1.1–3.2 ×  109/L)1.4 (1.2–1.9)1.0 (0.7–1.4)0.9 (0.6–1.4)0.0001.5 (1.1–1.9)1.2 (0.8–1.6)0.7 (0.5–1.1)0.000
 Eosinophils (0.02–0.52 × 109/L)0.09 (0.02–0.16)0.03 (0.00–0.08)0.02 (0.00–0.06)0.0050.06 (0.01–0.11)0.02 (0.00–0.08)0.00 (0.00–0.01)0.000
 Basophils (0–0.06 × 109/L)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.02 (0.01–0.03)0.5660.02 (0.01–0.03)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.015
 Lymphocyte percentage (20–50%)28.2 (21.9–33.4)18.8 (12.8–26.7)13.6 (9.7–20.5)0.00030.8 (22.4–37.4)24.8 (16.0–32.8)13.8 (7.7–20.9)0.000
 Neutrophil percentage (40–75%)61.2 (55.1–68.5)71.7 (62.0–80.5)78.6 (67.0–85.2)0.00059.3 (52.5–67.7)65.6 (57.1–77.0)78.7 (69.0–88.2)0.000
 Monocyte percentage (3–10%)7.4 (6.2–8.8)6.6 (5.0–8.6)6.0 (4.2–7.8)0.0737.3 (5.9–9.2)7.2 (5.3–9.2)6.1 (3.1–8.5)0.000
 Eosinophil percentage (0.4–8%)1.7 (0.3–2.8)0.5 (0.0–1.3)0.2 (0.0–1.2)0.0101.1 (0.2–2.2)0.4 (0.0–1.4)0.0 (0.0–0.3)0.000
 Basophil percentage (0–1%)0.4 (0.2–0.5)0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.3 (0.1–0.4)0.0010.3 (0.2–0.5)0.3 (0.2–0.4)0.2 (0.1–0.3)0.000
 Platelets (125–350 × 109/L)194.5 (169.8–240.0)185.0 (141.0–252.0)182.0 (131.0–222.0)0.348201.0 (163.0–249.0)193.5 (152.8–249.0)166.0 (118.5–202.4)0.000
 Hemoglobin (130–175 g/L)123.0 (113.0–138.3)123.0 (109.0–134.0)123.0 (108.0–136.0)0.351130.0 (120.0–141.0)129.0 (121.0–140.0)127.6 (112.0–139.0)0.041
 Monocytes (0.1–0.6 × 109/L)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.4 (0.3–0.6)0.2650.4 (0.3–0.5)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0.4 (0.2–0.5)0.617
 Activated partial thromboplastin time (20–40 s)27.6 (25.2–30.1)27.6 (24.1–32.3)28.1 (24.4–33.3)0.96227.8 (25.1–30.0)28.2 (25.3–31.1)30.1 (26.6–34.7)0.000
 Fibrinogen (2–4 g/L)2.6 (2.3–3.0)3.1 (2.5–3.6)3.1 (2.4–3.7)0.0002.4 (2.1–2.9)2.9 (2.4–3.3)3.2 (2.8–4.0)0.000
 Prothrombin time (9–13 s)11.5 (10.8–12.0)11.5 (11.0–12.4)11.9 (11.2–12.7)0.09311.4 (10.9–11.7)11.5 (11.0–12.0)11.8 (11.2–12.6)0.000
 International normalized ratio (0.7–1.3)1.0 (0.9–1.0)1.0 (0.9–1.1)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.0541.0 (0.9–1.0)1.0 (0.9–1.0)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.000
 D-dimer (0–1 μg/mL)0.6 (0.2–1.2)0.8 (0.4–2.3)1.5 (0.5–3.8)0.0000.4 (0.2–0.9)0.5 (0.3–1.4)1.2 (0.6–3.1)0.000
 Albumin (40–55 g/L)39.7 (36.0–42.0)37.0 (34.5–39.4)35.1 (31.3–39.8)0.00041.6 (38.9–44.2)39.5 (36.0–42.7)35.6 (32.6–39.3)0.000
 Globulin (20–40 g/L)27.9 (25.4–30.4)28.1 (24.6–32.3)28.5 (25.3–32.3)0.15427.0 (23.9–30.5)26.9 (24.0–30.4)28.9 (26.0–34.3)0.000
 Albumin-to-globulin ratio (1.2–2.4)1.4 (1.2–1.6)1.3 (1.1–1.5)1.3 (1.1–1.4)0.0001.5 (1.3–1.8)1.5 (1.3–1.7)1.2 (1.0–1.5)0.000
 Alanine aminotransferase (9–50 U/L)17.8 (11.7–28.5)19.1 (13.2–31.9)18.4 (12.2–30.2)0.63218.5 (12.6–30.0)21.0 (13.8–34.3)24.9 (15.5–34.1)0.275
 Aspartate aminotransferase (15–40 U/L)16.9 (13.2–24.4)20.7 (15.8–29.8)22.0 (16.0–36.8)0.28318.4 (15.0–23.4)22.0 (16.2–31.1)30.4 (22.4–45.0)0.000
 Total bilirubin (2–20.4 μmol/L)10.6 (7.9–14.4)9.4 (7.0–13.0)11.0 (6.0–15.4)0.1779.4 (7.2–13.0)9.4 (7.1–13.0)10.8 (7.2–14.3)0.086
 Serum urea (1.7–8.3 mmol/L)4.2 (3.6–5.3)5.0 (4.0–6.6)6.0 (4.3–9.1)0.0004.0 (3.2–4.8)4.0 (3.1–5.1)5.2 (3.9–6.9)0.000
 Serum creatinine (57–111 μmol/L)67.0 (53.7–82.5)65.1 (52.8–87.7)72.4 (53.1–101.6)0.20263.3 (51.0–77.2)65.7 (52.0–78.8)70.6 (55.4–86.5)0.007
 Alkaline phosphatase (40–150 U/L)60.4 (54.3–66.3)60.4 (46.0–60.4)60.4 (50.0–63.0)0.90860.4 (50.0–60.4)60.4 (44.0–60.4)60.4 (50.0–60.4)0.241
 Sodium ion (137–147 mmol/L)140.2 (140.1–142.0)140.2 (137.0–143.0)140.2 (136.0–142.0)0.201140.2 (140.2–140.2)140.1 (139.0–142.0)140.1 (137.0–141.0)0.016
 Potassium ion (3.5–5.3 mmol/L)3.9 (3.9–4.0)3.9 (3.6–4.1)3.9 (3.6–4.3)0.4303.9 (3.9–3.9)3.9 (3.7–4.0)3.9 (3.5–4.0)0.030
 Calcium ion (1.15–1.35 mmol/L)0.9 (0.9–1.0)0.9 (0.7–1.0)0.9 (0.7–1.0)0.5240.85 (0.85–0.85)0.85 (0.78–0.97)0.85 (0.74–0.99)0.089
 Creatine kinase (38–174 U/L)73.5 (48.0–125.1)74.0 (44.0–127.0)106.0 (59.6–161.0)0.01974.0 (49.0–125.1)78.0 (47.0–125.1)125.0 (58.5–188.5)0.000
 Lactate dehydrogenase (80–285 U/L)163.5 (141.8–209.7)203.0 (168.0–238.0)209.7 (181.0–317.0)0.000163.0 (136.0–209.7)192.5 (152.8–226.8)227.0 (197.5–353.5)0.000
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme (12–68 U/L)22.3 (21.5–24.8)22.3 (18.0–23.3)22.3 (18.9–25.3)0.16122.3 (20.7–23.1)22.3 (19.4–24.0)22.3 (17.6–22.3)0.006
 Creatine kinase isoenzyme (0–25 IU/L)8.2 (5.2–9.7)8.9 (6.0–11.6)10.1 (8.0–15.3)0.0087.4 (5.0–9.6)8.0 (6.0–10.0)9.6 (7.0–14.1)0.322
 alpha-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (72–182 U/L)126.5 (110.8–163.5)162.0 (131.0–189.0)166.0 (144.0–240.0)0.000129.0 (107.0–163.5)151.5 (120.0–174.3)177.0 (158.0–269.5)0.000
 γ-Glutamyltransferase (10–60 U/L)22.7 (15.2–46.6)23.6 (13.8–42.0)27.8 (16.4–42.0)0.63918.8 (12.0–30.9)22.1 (14.8–40.3)30.0 (20.0–50.4)0.000
 B-type brain natriuretic peptide (< 125 pg/mL)167.1 (36.8–327.8)140.0 (57.0–327.8)213.0 (73.0–372.0)0.978132.3 (19.0–327.8)241.0 (46.6–327.8)200.0 (46.8–389.7)0.010
 Troponin (< 0.03 μg/L)0.03 (0.00–0.07)0.02 (0.00–0.07)0.03 (0.01–0.07)0.0160.01 (0.00–0.07)0.01 (0.00–0.07)0.03 (0.01–0.07)0.986
 Glucose (3.9–6.1 mmol/L)6.8 (5.0–9.5)8.9 (6.1–11.3)8.9 (6.3–13.7)0.0085.0 (4.6–5.6)5.4 (4.8–6.3)6.3 (5.4–7.5)0.000
 Procalcitonin (< 0.04 ng/mL)0.05 (0.04–0.08)0.07 (0.04–0.13)0.13 (0.06–0.27)0.0000.04 (0.03–0.06)0.06 (0.04–0.10)0.13 (0.06–0.30)0.000
 C-reactive protein (0–0.5 mg/dL)0.5 (0.1–2.8)2.4 (0.5–4.5)3.5 (1.8–8.1)0.0000.2 (0.1–1.1)1.3 (0.2–3.6)4.2 (2.5–8.2)0.000

Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between moderate, severe, and critical patients with COVID-19. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Risk factors of severity of patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between moderate, severe, and critical patients with COVID-19. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Among the chronic complications, the proportions of cerebrovascular disease, coronary heart disease, digestive disorders, and COPD were significantly different in the subgroups (moderate, severe, and critical) of patients with and without diabetes, indicating that those complications were closely related to disease severity in patients with COVID-19, whether they had diabetes or not, as shown in Table 2 and Table S2. However, there were no significant differences in the proportion of heart failure (P = 0.562), hypertension (P = 0.406), solid tumor (P = 0.194), chronic renal disease (P = 0.055), and hepatitis (P = 0.186) among different subgroups of patients with diabetes. The proportion of heart failure (P = 0.000) and hypertension (P = 0.000) were significantly different among subgroups of patients without diabetes, and the higher the proportion of those complications, the more severe was the patient's condition. In terms of treatment, the application of glucocorticoids and immunoglobulin was closely related to the severity of the disease. The more severe the patient’s condition on admission, the greater was the likelihood of glucocorticoids and immunoglobulin administration.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 with or Without Diabetes

To further identify the risk factors related to the mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19, we divided critically ill patients into two subgroups based on disease outcomes: death and survival. As shown in Table 3, the mortality rate of critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes was 62.1% (54/87) and that of patients with COVID-19 without diabetes was 46.9% (83/177). Age was undoubtedly an important indicator of disease outcome in critically ill patients; the older the patient, the higher was the risk of death. Furthermore, the age of non-survivors in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes was younger than that in patients without diabetes (69.5 [IQR 53.5–81.3] vs. 75.0 [IQR 66.0–85.0]). Regardless of whether patients with COVID-19 had diabetes or not, those with cerebrovascular disease and chronic kidney disease had higher mortality. Combined with Table 2, cerebrovascular disease was closely related to the disease severity and mortality of patients with COVID-19, which may be an effective indicator to evaluate the disease progression and prognosis of patients with COVID-19, while hypertension may be an independent risk factor for progression and outcome only in patients with COVID-19 without diabetes.
Table 3

Risk factors of mortality of patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes

Critical patients with diabetes (n = 87)Critical patients without diabetes (n = 177)
Survivor (n = 33)Non-survivor (n = 54)PSurvivor (n = 94)Non-survivor (n = 83)P
Age, median (IQR), years65.0 (53.5–70.0)69.5 (60.5–81.3)0.00558.0 (43.8–68.0)75.0 (66.0–85.0)0.000
 Distribution, (%)
  < 401 (3.0)0 (0)0.22318 (19.1)1 (1.2)0.000
  40–6011 (33.3)13 (24.1)32 (34.0)12 (14.5)
  > 6021 (63.6)41 (75.9)44 (46.8)70 (84.3)
Gender, %
 Female15 (45.5)20 (37.0)0.43740 (42.6)29 (34.9)0.300
 Male18 (54.5)34 (63.0)54 (57.4)54 (65.1)
Chronic disease, %
 Cerebrovascular disease4 (12.1)26 (48.1)0.0016 (6.4)33 (39.8)0.000
 Coronary heart disease12 (36.4)16 (29.6)0.51410 (10.6)30 (36.1)0.000
 Heart failure2 (6.1)3 (5.6)1.0005 (5.3)12 (14.5)0.039
 Hypertension23 (69.7)40 (74.1)0.65838 (40.4)49 (59.0)0.013
 Digestive disorder14 (42.4)28 (51.9)0.39356 (59.6)37 (44.6)0.046
 COPD2 (6.1)7 (13.0)0.5073 (3.2)8 (9.6)0.076
 Solid tumor4 (12.1)5 (9.3)0.9504 (4.3)11 (13.3)0.032
 Chronic renal disease3 (9.1)15 (27.8)0.0374 (4.3)20 (24.1)0.000
 Hepatitis1 (3.0)1 (1.9)1.0000 (0)1 (1.2)0.950
Complications, %
 Acute liver injury12 (36.4)13 (24.1)0.21929 (30.9)17 (20.5)0.116
 Septic shock2 (6.1)7 (13.0)0.5078 (8.5)5 (6.0)0.527
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome27 (81.8)37 (68.5)0.17279 (84.0)57 (68.7)0.016
Lung CT images, %
 Unilateral pneumonia5 (15.2)7 (13.0)1.00011 (11.7)7 (8.4)0.473
 Bilateral pneumonia26 (78.8)26 (48.1)0.00575 (79.8)43 (51.8)0.000
 Normal2 (6.1)21 (38.9)0.0018 (8.5)33 (39.8)0.000
 Multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity17 (51.5)13 (24.1)0.00966 (70.2)25 (30.1)0.000
Treatment strategies, %
 Antibiotics32 (97.0)53 (98.1)1.00094 (100.0)76 (91.6)0.013
 Antiviral drugs31 (93.9)45 (83.3)0.26692 (97.9)70 (84.3)0.001
 Glucocorticoids28 (84.8)38 (70.4)0.12685 (90.4)51 (61.4)0.000
 Immunoglobulin16 (48.5)9 (16.7)0.00037 (39.4)18 (21.7)0.011
 Invasive mechanical ventilation13 (39.4)23 (42.6)0.76934 (36.2)27 (32.5)0.611
 Noninvasive mechanical ventilation24 (72.7)26 (48.1)0.02456 (59.6)48 (57.8)0.814
Hospital stays, median (IQR), days37.0 (22.5–48.0)19.5 (8.0–32.3)0.00026.0 (16.0–44.3)13.0 (4.0–26.0)0.000
Blood biochemical parameters, median (IQR)
 Leukocytes (3.5–9.5 × 109/L)4.8 (4.2–7.2)7.7 (5.0–12.3)0.0035.5 (4.0–8.2)6.9 (4.5–9.8)0.128
 Neutrophils (1.8–6.3 × 109/L)3.8 (3.1–6.1)5.6 (3.4–10.4)0.0044.1 (2.9–6.6)4.9 (3.1–8.3)0.179
 Lymphocytes (1.1–3.2 × 109/L)0.7 (0.5–1.1)0.9 (0.6–1.4)0.1100.8 (0.6–1.1)0.7 (0.5–0.1)0.371
 Eosinophils (0.02–0.52 × 109/L)0.00 (0.00–0.03)0.01 (0.00–0.06)0.0520.00 (0.00–0.01)0.00 (0.00–0.03)0.110
 Basophils (0–0.06 × 109/L)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.02 (0.01–0.02)0.2090.01 (0.01–0.02)0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.530
 Lymphocyte percentage (20–50%)12.3 (9.0–17.5)13.3 (6.3–19.9)0.47414.0 (10.1–21.8)12.8 (6.8–20.7)0.504
 Neutrophil percentage (40–75%)79.5 (73.2–85.5)81.9 (69.0–87.5)0.74078.4 (68.9–85.5)79.4 (69.0–90.2)0.371
 Monocyte percentage (3–10%)6.0 (4.8–7.3)5.1 (3.4–7.4)0.8886.8 (3.5–9.1)5.2 (2.7–7.7)0.110
 Eosinophil percentage (0.4–8%)0.1 (0.0–0.5)0.1 (0.0–1.0)0.2080.0 (0.0–0.3)0.1 (0.0–0.4)0.089
 Basophil percentage (0–1%)0.2 (0.1–0.4)0.2 (0.1–0.3)0.8090.2 (0.1–0.3)0.2 (0.1–0.3)0.424
 Platelets (125–350 × 109/L)196.0 (154.5–226.0)174.5 (124.8–210.0)0.443179.0 (137.5–210.2)149.0 (111.0–195.0)0.075
 Hemoglobin (130–175 g/L)125.0 (113.5–135.5)123.0 (103.0–136.0)0.269132.0 (120.8–141.3)122.0 (104.0–137.0)0.000
 Monocytes (0.1–0.6 × 109/L)0.3 (0.2–0.5)0.4 (0.3–0.7)0.0660.4 (0.2–0.5)0.3 (0.2–0.5)0.499
 Activated partial thromboplastin time (20–40 s)28.0 (24.3–30.5)27.9 (23.5–34.3)0.47529.8 (24.9–33.9)30.7 (27.3–35.7)0.045
 Fibrinogen (2–4 g/L)3.2 (2.6–3.7)3.5 (2.6–4.0)0.7383.1 (2.8–3.9)3.4 (2.8–4.0)0.363
 Prothrombin time (9–13 s)11.6 (11.0–12.4)12.1 (11.4–12.9)0.12711.7 (11.1–12.3)11.9 (11.4–13.0)0.005
 International normalized ratio (0.7–1.3)1.0 (0.9–1.1)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.1331.0 (0.9–1.1)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.006
 D-dimer (0–1 μg/mL)1.8 (0.5–6.1)1.9 (0.8–4.6)0.1700.7 (0.5–2.4)2.0 (0.9–5.1)0.064
 Albumin (40–55 g/L)34.4 (31.3–40.1)33.6 (30.8–37.9)0.35036.9 (33.6–40.4)34.6 (31.2–39.2)0.001
 Globulin (20–40 g/L)27.6 (25.3–32.1)29.0 (25.9–32.9)0.12828.2 (25.4–33.6)29.2 (26.6–34.9)0.364
 Albumin-to-globulin ratio (1.2–2.4)1.3 (1.1–1.4)1.2 (1.0–1.3)0.1491.3 (1.1–1.5)1.2 (0.9–1.4)0.003
 Alanine aminotransferase (9–50 U/L)24.6 (13.2–38.3)19.0 (10.9–29.3)0.30725.5 (17.9–37.0)21.5 (13.6–32.1)0.568
 Aspartate aminotransferase (15–40 U/L)23.9 (16.7–40.5)25.7 (18.4–42.7)0.84431.1 (21.0–45.6)29.2 (22.8–44.9)0.426
 Total bilirubin (2–20.4 μmol/L)11.6 (6.0–17.9)11.5 (5.4–15.0)0.32810.1 (7.1–13.8)12.0 (7.2–15.7)0.807
 Serum urea (1.7–8.3 mmol/L)5.7 (3.7–7.3)6.8 (5.1–11.8)0.0014.4 (3.2–6.1)6.0 (4.5–8.9)0.001
 Serum creatinine (57–111 μmol/L)68.4 (49.4–90.6)81.1 (57.2–119.7)0.03563.6 (51.4–79.9)75.4 (59.4–98.5)0.008
 Alkaline phosphatase (40–150 U/L)60.4 (48.0–61.2)60.4 (50.8–62.3)0.28060.4 (46.0–60.4)60.4 (58.0–60.4)0.134
 Sodium ion (137–147 mmol/L)138.0 (135.0–141.0)140.2 (135.8–142.3)0.345140.2 (137.0–142.0)140.2 (135.0–141.0)0.094
 Potassium ion (3.5–5.3 mmol/L)3.8 (3.5–4.3)3.9 (3.6–4.4)0.3313.9 (3.5–3.9)3.9 (3.5–4.1)0.302
 Calcium ion (1.15–1.35 mmol/L)0.9 (0.7–1.0)0.9 (0.7–1.0)0.8110.85 (0.74–1.02)0.85 (0.73–0.89)0.552
 Creatine kinase (38–174 U/L)100.0 (50.5–172.0)125.1 (62.5–205.8)0.229107.0 (55.0–166.8)125.1 (64.0–239.6)0.647
 Lactate dehydrogenase (80–285 U/L)218.0 (203.0–351.5)213.0 (184.8–377.0)0.343222.0 (192.8–343.3)239.0 (209.0–388.0)0.054
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme (12–68 U/L)22.3 (19.0–26.1)22.3 (16.9–24.7)0.95522.2 (17.5–22.3)22.3 (17.9–22.8)0.680
 Creatine kinase isoenzyme (0–25 IU/L)9.6 (8.0–12.5)11.1 (9.0–17.3)0.0349.0 (7.0–12.1)11.0 (8.0–17.4)0.006
 alpha-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (72–182 U/L)186.0 (156.5–276.0)169.5 (143.3–292.8)0.386169.0 (153.0–254.3)191.0 (163.5–295.0)0.038
 γ-Glutamyltransferase (10–60 U/L)29.2 (17.5–38.3)27.9 (16.9–45.1)0.74929.8 (20.0–53.9)34.0 (20.2–49.0)0.178
 B-type brain natriuretic peptide (< 125 pg/mL)116.0 (68.0–388.0)217.3 (92.8–536.9)0.06294.0 (30.4–327.8)327.8 (172.6–788.7)0.032
 Troponin (< 0.03 μg/L)0.03 (0.01–0.06)0.04 (0.01–0.10)0.1280.01 (0.01–0.03)0.06 (0.02–0.07)0.040
 Glucose (3.9–6.1 mmol/L)10.1 (7.0–14.4)8.2 (6.2–13.1)0.7426.2 (5.2–7.5)6.3 (5.4–7.4)0.570
 Procalcitonin (< 0.04 ng/mL)0.12 (0.06–0.24)0.20 (0.08–0.49)0.0170.08 (0.06–0.18)0.23 (0.10–0.55)0.036
 C-reactive protein (0–0.5 mg/dL)4.0 (2.4–9.8)4.5 (2.5–8.1)0.2714.1 (1.5–7.4)4.6 (2.6–10.0)0.065

Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between survivors and non-survivors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Risk factors of mortality of patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes Data are presented as n (%) or median (IQR). P values indicate differences between survivors and non-survivors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease In the blood test parameters in Table 3, we observed that the levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, serum urea, serum creatinine, creatine kinase isoenzyme, and procalcitonin were associated with a poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. The levels of hemoglobin, prothrombin time, albumin, albumin-to-globulin ratio, alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, B-type brain natriuretic peptide, and troponin were different between survivor and non-survivor in patients without diabetes, but not in patients with diabetes. Lung CT imaging data showed that among the survivors, the proportion of patients with double pneumonia and multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacities was higher. In critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, there were no significant differences in the use of antibiotics, antivirals, and glucocorticoids between survivors and non-survivors. We found a positive correlation between the use of immunoglobulin and survival in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.

Risk Factors for Non-survivors in the Critical Group with Diabetes

The significant risk factors (Table 3) were analyzed using binary logistic regression taking death as the dependent variable. Nine variables, namely age, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, bilateral pneumonia, multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacities, immunoglobulin, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, leukocyte and neutrophil count, were independent risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Even after adjustment for age, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, bilateral pneumonia, multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacities, immunoglobulin, and noninvasive mechanical ventilation, the counts of leukocytes and neutrophils maintained a significant association with a lower odds ratio (OR) for risk of death in the critical group with diabetes (all P < 0.05) (Table 4).
Table 4

Risk factors for non-survivors (n = 54) in the critical group with diabetes by binary logistic regression analysis

OR95% CI for ORPOR95% CI for ORP
Age0.9490.914–0.9850.006
Cerebrovascular disease0.1490.046–0.4800.001
Chronic renal disease0.2600.069–0.9810.047
Bilateral pneumonia4.0001.485–10.7220.006
Multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity3.3511.329–8.4490.010
Immunoglobulin4.7061.750–12.6530.0024.9131.759–13.7170.002
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation2.8721.129–7.3060.0271.7570.375–8.2360.475
Leukocytes0.8480.749–0.9620.0100.759§0.611–0.944§0.013§
Neutrophils0.8520.749–0.9680.0140.761§0.606–0.955§0.019§

CI confidence interval

†Adjusted for hypertension

‡Adjusted for cerebrovascular disease, glucocorticoids, and acute respiratory distress syndrome

§Adjusted for age, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, bilateral pneumonia, multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity, immunoglobulin, and noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Patients with diabetes in the critical group were included in the analysis

Risk factors for non-survivors (n = 54) in the critical group with diabetes by binary logistic regression analysis CI confidence interval †Adjusted for hypertension ‡Adjusted for cerebrovascular disease, glucocorticoids, and acute respiratory distress syndrome §Adjusted for age, cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal disease, bilateral pneumonia, multiple military mottling and ground-glass opacity, immunoglobulin, and noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Patients with diabetes in the critical group were included in the analysis To further illustrate the relationship between the application of immunoglobulin or noninvasive mechanical ventilation and mortality in critical patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, we analyzed the characteristics of those patients who use immunoglobulin and noninvasive mechanical ventilation or not, and found that in immunoglobulin-free group, the rates of hypertension and mortality were higher (Table S3); after adjustment for hypertension, there was still a significant association between immunoglobulin use and mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes (Table 4). Whereas, patients who did not use noninvasive mechanical ventilation had higher rate of cerebrovascular disease and mortality, and the incidence of ARDS and use of glucocorticoids were lower (Table S4). After adjustment for cerebrovascular disease, ARDS, and glucocorticoids, we found that noninvasive mechanical ventilation was not associated with mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes (Table 4). A ROC curve analysis was performed to verify the diagnostic accuracy of the count of leukocytes and neutrophils for the risk of death in the critical group with diabetes. The area under the curve (AUC) for leukocytes and neutrophils was 0.68 (95% CI 0.57–0.80, P < 0.01) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.53–0.76, P < 0.05), respectively. The optimal cutoff points for leukocytes and neutrophils were 5.37 × 109/L and 8.72 × 109/L, respectively. At this level, the Youden index was 0.35 (leukocytes) and 0.34 (neutrophils); sensitivity was 74.07% (leukocytes, 95% CI 0.60–0.85) and 42.59% (neutrophils, 95% CI 0.27–0.57); and specificity was 60.61% (leukocytes, 95% CI 0.42–0.77) and 90.91% (neutrophils, 95% CI 0.76–0.98). The AUC for leukocytes was higher than that for neutrophils (Fig. 1a, b). Therefore, leukocytes may be a better predictive marker (cutoff point 5.37 × 109/L) for the risk of death in the critical group with diabetes.
Fig. 1

a, b ROC analysis of leukocytes and neutrophils for the risk of death in the critical group with diabetes (n = 87). c, d Kaplan–Meier survival curve for critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes with different counts of leukocytes (P = 0.0448) and neutrophils (P = 0.1426), and who use immunoglobulin or not (e)

a, b ROC analysis of leukocytes and neutrophils for the risk of death in the critical group with diabetes (n = 87). c, d Kaplan–Meier survival curve for critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes with different counts of leukocytes (P = 0.0448) and neutrophils (P = 0.1426), and who use immunoglobulin or not (e) The Kaplan–Meier survival curve also showed a trend toward poorer survival in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes whose leukocytes were > 5.37 × 109/L than for those whose leukocytes were ≤ 5.37 × 109/L (P = 0.0448), and the HR was 1.784 (95% CI 1.014–3.140) (Fig. 1c). However, there was no difference in survival time between patients with COVID-19 and diabetes whose neutrophils were > 8.72 × 109/L and those whose neutrophils were ≤ 8.72 × 109/L (P = 0.1426). Moreover, patients treated with immunoglobulin had longer survival times than patients who did not receive IVIG, P < 0.05 [HR 0.5278 (95% CI 0.2891–0.9621)].

Discussion

Our study analyzed the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 with and without diabetes. Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the prevalence of diabetes was 17.7%. Patients with diabetes were older (66.0 [IQR 58.0–73.8]) and more likely to have chronic complications. Consistent with previous publications [7, 8], the most common symptoms for patients with COVID-19 were fever and cough. Patients with diabetes were more likely to suffer bilateral pneumonia, more severe organ dysfunction, and metabolic disorder, so they had a greater occurrence of septic shock and ARDS, more severe disease, and a significantly higher mortality. Since diabetes has more significant harmful effects on microvascular and macrovascular systems and digestive system functions [9] when cerebrovascular diseases, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and digestive disorders coexist with diabetes, they affect each other, forming a vicious cycle, and patients' conditions are more likely to develop into critical illness. Based on the pathological mechanism of diabetes and its influence on other systems (immune system, etc.) [10, 11], immune dysregulation (impaired neutrophil function and reduced T cell-mediated immune response [12]) and the exaggerated pro-inflammatory cytokine response [13] might be the key drivers of poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Moreover, the cell surface receptor for SARS-CoV-2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [14], can be upregulated by thiazolidinediones (a class of insulin sensitizer), which may have contributed to the disease progression of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. The difference of disease profile between male and female individuals may be due to the high expression of ACE2 in the testis, which increased the duration of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the body and made it more difficult to clear the virus, thus causing higher disease severity in male patients [15]. With the increase in disease severity, patients' inflammatory indicators, d-dimer and fibrinogen levels, and hepatic and renal dysfunction indicators were significantly upregulated. Blood glucose levels on admission were also elevated with the increase in disease severity, and it was higher and changed more significantly in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Infection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with diabetes might trigger a stress response and increased secretion of hyperglycemic hormones, such as glucocorticoids and catecholamines, which results in elevated blood glucose, abnormal glucose variability, and diabetic complications. The use of glucocorticoids for treatment will also have the aforementioned negative effects. Although there was no significant association between blood glucose levels on admission and mortality in patients with COVID-19, timely and standardized blood glucose management for patients with COVID-19 and diabetes is urgently needed. Li et al. found that, compared with individuals with poor blood glucose control (blood glucose variability in the upper limit of 10.0 mmol/L), the mortality rate of individuals with good blood glucose control (blood glucose variability in the range of 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) was significantly reduced (1.1% vs. 11.0%). Moreover, good blood glucose control will enable cured patients to have a better state of recovery after a negative viral nucleic acid test, with less multiorgan dysfunction. Therefore, good blood glucose control is an effective auxiliary measure for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 [16]. Leukocytes > 5.37 × 109/L was associated with a higher risk of death and shorter survival time in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Leukocytes and neutrophils are indicators of inflammation. Critical patients with COVID-19 exhibited extremely high inflammatory parameters [17], and previous studies reported that the association between diabetes and lung dysfunction may be partly explained by systemic inflammation [18, 19]. Therefore, consideration of inflammatory responses is necessary when clinically managing patients with diabetes who have COVID-19, and the determination of how to block inflammation and when to initiate anti-inflammatory therapy is critical for reducing the death rate of COVID-19. Consistent with previous studies [20], our binary logistic regression analysis showed that age, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic renal disease were independent risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Studies have shown that hypertension was the most common comorbidity in patients with COVID-19, followed by diabetes and coronary heart disease [20], and hypertension was a risk factor for disease progression in patients with COVID-19 [21]. However, we found no association between hypertension and poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, but did find an association in patients with COVID-19 without diabetes, which may demonstrate that the impact of diabetes on disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 was greater than that of hypertension. Age-dependent decreases in cellular and humoral immune function in elderly patients have been reported before, especially with regard to adaptive immune function [22]. The high risks of elderly patients with diabetes could be due to their poor overall health condition and greater number of comorbidities [7]. In terms of treatment measures, we found that the use of immunoglobulin increased with the severity of the disease, and it was associated with lower death in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. We found that albumin, hemoglobin level, and the albumin-to-globulin ratio were obviously lower in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes than in those without diabetes, and the levels decreased with increasing disease severity. Moreover, these indicators were lower in patients who died than those who survived, although there was no significant difference, suggesting that patients’ nutritional status and immune function were worsening with the progression of the disease. IVIG could significantly increase the serum IgG level, not only improving the patient's ability to resist infections and reduce the incidence of complications but also significantly reducing the duration of antibiotic use and hospital stay [23]. IVIG plays an important role in modulating immune function, especially in a hyperinflammatory state. Therefore, active and adequate use of immunoglobulin may be an effective means to reduce mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Diabetes is a chronic inflammatory metabolic disease that is accompanied by damage to multiple organ system functions, such as the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, kidney, and digestive systems [9]. Patients with COVID-19 were in a hyperinflammatory state, especially critically ill patients, who were more likely to suffer “cytokine storm”; therefore, during the progression of disease, the inflammatory biomarkers and metabolic or organ dysfunction indicators were not significantly different among the subgroups (moderate, severe, and critical) in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. This phenomenon also suggested that diabetes played a vital role in influencing disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19, and the changes in many indicators (such as hypertension and heart failure) were not sufficient to affect the disease progress in patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. As a result of the retrospective nature of the study and the unprecedented scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study has several limitations. (1) We have not distinguished “diabetes” as type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. (2) Missing data on some variables, such as detailed information on blood parameters, may cause bias in the estimation and a reduction in the representativeness of the samples. (3) The laboratory parameters were measured upon admission and may indicate the severity of COVID-19. The causal relationship between abnormal laboratory findings and severity could not be determined. (4) Other diabetes-associated parameters, including glycated hemoglobin, “peak levels” or “postprandial levels” of plasma glucose could better reflect the association of plasma glucose control and mortality in patients with COVID-19 if that data was available.

Conclusion

Compared with patients with COVID-19 without diabetes, patients with comorbid diabetes had more severe disease and higher mortality. Age, cerebrovascular disease, coronary heart disease, digestive disorders, and COPD were associated with disease severity in patients with or without diabetes, while heart failure and hypertension were related to disease severity in patients without diabetes only. More attention should be paid to patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, especially when they have high leukocyte (> 5.37 × 109/L) and neutrophil counts (> 8.72 × 109/L), older age, cerebrovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease, owing to cases of missed diagnosis and rapid disease deterioration. Leukocytes (> 5.37 × 109/L) were associated with higher mortality and shorter survival time in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. In clinical practice, timely and adequate immunoglobulin use in critical patients may reduce the mortality of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 40 kb) Supplementary file2 (DOCX 18 kb) Supplementary file3 (DOCX 22 kb) Supplementary file4 (DOCX 23 kb)
Why carry out this study?
Diabetes is one of the most common comorbidities of COVID-19.
We aimed to conduct a multidimensional analysis of risk factors associated with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients with diabetes.
What was learned from the study?
More attention should be paid to patients with COVID-19 and diabetes, especially when they have high leukocyte (> 5.37 × 109/L) and neutrophil counts (> 8.72 × 109/L), older age, cerebrovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease.
Timely and adequate intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) use may reduce the mortality of critical COVID-19 patients with diabetes.
  20 in total

Review 1.  The heterogeneous pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jorma Ilonen; Johanna Lempainen; Riitta Veijola
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Increased risk of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  L M A J Muller; K J Gorter; E Hak; W L Goudzwaard; F G Schellevis; A I M Hoepelman; G E H M Rutten
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Mortality of COVID-19 Patients With Diabetes in Wuhan, China: A Two-Center, Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Qiao Shi; Xiaoyi Zhang; Fang Jiang; Xuanzhe Zhang; Ning Hu; Chibu Bimu; Jiarui Feng; Su Yan; Yongjun Guan; Dongxue Xu; Guangzhen He; Chen Chen; Xingcheng Xiong; Lei Liu; Hanjun Li; Jing Tao; Zhiyong Peng; Weixing Wang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Effects of Apelin Peptides on Diabetic Complications.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Chengyu Liu; Cheng Cheng; Ling Zheng; Kun Huang
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 6.  A shared comparison of diabetes mellitus and neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Mahmoud Morsi; Ahmed Maher; Omnia Aboelmagd; Dina Johar; Larry Bernstein
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 7.  The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Steven M Opal; Timothy D Girard; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  LRH-1 agonism favours an immune-islet dialogue which protects against diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nadia Cobo-Vuilleumier; Petra I Lorenzo; Noelia García Rodríguez; Irene de Gracia Herrera Gómez; Esther Fuente-Martin; Livia López-Noriega; José Manuel Mellado-Gil; Silvana-Yanina Romero-Zerbo; Mathurin Baquié; Christian Claude Lachaud; Katja Stifter; German Perdomo; Marco Bugliani; Vincenzo De Tata; Domenico Bosco; Geraldine Parnaud; David Pozo; Abdelkrim Hmadcha; Javier P Florido; Miguel G Toscano; Peter de Haan; Kristina Schoonjans; Luis Sánchez Palazón; Piero Marchetti; Reinhold Schirmbeck; Alejandro Martín-Montalvo; Paolo Meda; Bernat Soria; Francisco-Javier Bermúdez-Silva; Luc St-Onge; Benoit R Gauthier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease on 95 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Guiyuan Jiang; Yanping Cai; Xue Yi; Yanping Li; Yong Lin; Qing Li; Jingqing Xu; Mingyao Ke; Keying Xue
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.327

10.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of albumin-to-globulin ratio in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan R Ulloque-Badaracco; Melany D Mosquera-Rojas; Enrique A Hernandez-Bustamante; Esteban A Alarcón-Braga; Percy Herrera-Añazco; Vicente A Benites-Zapata
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 2.  Serum hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase and COVID-19 severity and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Angelo Zinellu; Panagiotis Paliogiannis; Ciriaco Carru; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.057

3.  Leukocyte glucose index as a novel biomarker for COVID-19 severity.

Authors:  Wendy Marilú Ramos-Hernández; Luis F Soto; Marcos Del Rosario-Trinidad; Carlos Noe Farfan-Morales; Luis Adrián De Jesús-González; Gustavo Martínez-Mier; Juan Fidel Osuna-Ramos; Fernando Bastida-González; Víctor Bernal-Dolores; Rosa María Del Ángel; José Manuel Reyes-Ruiz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.