BACKGROUND: Impaired balance and strength commonly affect athletes with conditions like chronic ankle instability (CAI). Yet, clinical research surrounding the relationship between balance, strength, and CAI is still growing. Deeper investigation of these relationships is warranted to better inform clinical practice patterns when managing athletes with balance deficits. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between single leg balance, ankle strength, and hip strength in healthy, active adults. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Forty healthy participants (age 23.7 ± 4.9 years) were assessed for static balance, using a modified version of the Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), as well as isometric strength of ankle and hip musculature via handheld dynamometry. Pearson's correlations were used to analyze relationships between balance and strength measures. Paired t-tests were utilized to compare dominant and non-dominant limb performance. RESULTS: Negligible to low, negative correlations were found between balance scores and hip extension strength (r = -0.24 to -0.38, p<0.05). High, positive correlations were found between ankle and hip strength measures (r = 0.75 to 0.84, p<0.05). When comparing dominant to non-dominant limbs, only minimal differences were noted in ankle eversion strength (mean difference = 6.0%, p<0.01) and hip extension strength (mean difference = 5.5%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Minimal relationships were identified between static balance and isometric ankle and hip strength. Comparison of dominant and non-dominant limbs suggests that clinicians should expect relative symmetry in balance and strength in healthy adults. Thus, asymmetries found during clinical examination should raise suspicion of specific impairments that may lead to dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.
BACKGROUND: Impaired balance and strength commonly affect athletes with conditions like chronic ankle instability (CAI). Yet, clinical research surrounding the relationship between balance, strength, and CAI is still growing. Deeper investigation of these relationships is warranted to better inform clinical practice patterns when managing athletes with balance deficits. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between single leg balance, ankle strength, and hip strength in healthy, active adults. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Forty healthy participants (age 23.7 ± 4.9 years) were assessed for static balance, using a modified version of the Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), as well as isometric strength of ankle and hip musculature via handheld dynamometry. Pearson's correlations were used to analyze relationships between balance and strength measures. Paired t-tests were utilized to compare dominant and non-dominant limb performance. RESULTS: Negligible to low, negative correlations were found between balance scores and hip extension strength (r = -0.24 to -0.38, p<0.05). High, positive correlations were found between ankle and hip strength measures (r = 0.75 to 0.84, p<0.05). When comparing dominant to non-dominant limbs, only minimal differences were noted in ankle eversion strength (mean difference = 6.0%, p<0.01) and hip extension strength (mean difference = 5.5%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Minimal relationships were identified between static balance and isometric ankle and hip strength. Comparison of dominant and non-dominant limbs suggests that clinicians should expect relative symmetry in balance and strength in healthy adults. Thus, asymmetries found during clinical examination should raise suspicion of specific impairments that may lead to dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c.
Authors: Tamara C Valovich McLeod; David H Perrin; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Sandra J Shultz; Robert Diamond; Bruce M Gansneder Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Cassandra Thompson; Siobhan Schabrun; Rick Romero; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Jaap van Dieen; Paul Marshall Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Cristina Adillón; Montse Gallegos; Silvia Treviño; Isabel Salvat Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390