| Literature DB >> 33110310 |
Shalini Kapoor1, Anjali Dudeja1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Open gingival embrasure often poses complex functional and esthetic problems. Interdental papilla reconstruction is among the most challenging periodontal treatments. Hyaluronic acid (HA) gel injection, a noninvasive technique with immediate papilla reconstruction, has been recently proposed. This minimally invasive therapeutic procedure has shown predictable esthetic outcome, thus, gaining rapid acceptance as an esthetic treatment modality in dentistry. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical application of derma fillers (HA gel) for the reconstruction of the interdental papilla in the esthetic zone.Entities:
Keywords: Black triangles; esthetics; hyaluronic acid; interdental papilla
Year: 2020 PMID: 33110310 PMCID: PMC7580754 DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_693_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Dent ISSN: 0976-2361
Properties of hyaluronic acid
| Biocompatible[ |
| Regulation of immune response[ |
| Osteoinductive and antioxidant[ |
| Promotes healing[ |
| As a diagnostic marker[ |
| Principle ligand for CD4+[ |
| Provides elasticity and stability to tissue[ |
Figure 1Nordland and tarnow classification
Figure 2Pre treatment photographs
Figure 3Pre treatment photographs
Figure 4Using stent for measurements
Figure 5Gel injected 2–3 mm apical to tip of the papilla
Figure 6AT 3 Weeks
Figure 10Followup AT 3 Months
Figure 11AT 6 Month
Figure 12AT 6 Month
Percentage change in interdental papilla fill after 3 weeks and 3 months
| Case number | Embrasure space at baseline, mm | After 3 weeks, mm | After 3 months, mm | Amount of gain, mm (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 (Class I) | 1 | 0.1 | 1.9 (95) |
| 2 | 5 (Class II) | 3.8 | 0 | 5 (100) |
| 3 | 4 (Class II) | 2.8 | 0 | 4 (100) |
| 4 | 5.5 (Class II) | 4.6 | 1.2 | 4.3 (78.1) |
| 5 | 3 (Class I) | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 (57) |
| 6 | 4 (Class II) | 3 | 0.5 | 3.5 (87.5) |
| 7 | 3 (Class I) | 1 | 0 | 3 (100) |
Percentage change in interdental papilla fill after 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months
| Case number | Embrasure space at baseline, mm | After 3 weeks, mm | After 3 months, mm | After 6 months, mm | Amount of gain, mm (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 (Class I) | 1 | 0.1 | 0 | 2 (100) |
| 2 | 5 (Class II) | 3.8 | 0 | 0.5 | 4.5 (90) |
| 3 | 4 (Class II) | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 4 (100) |
| 4 | 5.5 (Class II) | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 4.3 (78.1) |
| 5 | 3 (Class I) | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0 | 3 (57) |
| 6 | 4 (Class II) | 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.5 (87.5) |
| 7 | 3 (Class I) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 (100) |
Level of significance of papilla fill after 3 months
| Mean | SD | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | 1.33 | 0.54 | 0.002 |
SD: Standard deviation; SEM: Standard error of the mean
Level of significance of papilla fill after 6 months
| Mean | SD | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | 0.87 | 0.33 | 0.000 |
SD: Standard deviation; SEM: Standard error of the mean