Oh-Joon Kwon1, Li Zhang1, Deyong Jia1, Li Xin2,3. 1. Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. 2. Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. xin18@uw.edu. 3. Institute of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. xin18@uw.edu.
Abstract
Prostate adenocarcinoma undergoes neuroendocrine differentiation to acquire resistance toward antihormonal therapies. The underlying mechanisms have been investigated extensively, among which Sox2 has been shown to play a critical role. However, genetic evidence in mouse models for prostate cancer to support the crucial role of Sox2 is missing. The adult mouse prostate luminal cells contain both castration-resistant Sox2-expressing Sca-1+ cells and castration-responsive Sca-1- cells. We show that both types of the luminal cell are susceptible to oncogenic transformation induced by loss of function of the tumor suppressor Pten. The tumors derived from the Sca-1+ cells are castration resistant and are more inclined to develop castration-induced neuroendocrine differentiation. Genetic ablation of Sox2 suppresses neuroendocrine differentiation but does not impact the castration-resistant property. This study provides direct genetic evidence that Sox2 is necessary for androgen ablation-induced neuroendocrine differentiation of Pten null prostate adenocarcinoma, corroborates that the lineage status of the prostate cancer cells is a determinant for its propensity to exhibit lineage plasticity, and supports that the intrinsic features of cell-of-origin for prostate cancers can dictate their clinical behaviors.
Prostate adenocarcinoma undergoes neuroendocrine differentiation to acquire resistance toward antihormonal therapies. The underlying mechanisms have been investigated extensively, among which Sox2 has been shown to play a critical role. However, genetic evidence in mouse models for prostate cancer to support the crucial role of Sox2 is missing. The adult mouse prostate luminal cells contain both castration-resistant Sox2-expressing Sca-1+ cells and castration-responsive Sca-1- cells. We show that both types of the luminal cell are susceptible to oncogenic transformation induced by loss of function of the tumor suppressor Pten. The tumors derived from the Sca-1+ cells are castration resistant and are more inclined to develop castration-induced neuroendocrine differentiation. Genetic ablation of Sox2 suppresses neuroendocrine differentiation but does not impact the castration-resistant property. This study provides direct genetic evidence that Sox2 is necessary for androgen ablation-induced neuroendocrine differentiation of Pten null prostate adenocarcinoma, corroborates that the lineage status of the prostate cancer cells is a determinant for its propensity to exhibit lineage plasticity, and supports that the intrinsic features of cell-of-origin for prostate cancers can dictate their clinical behaviors.
Lineage plasticity is defined as a process through which cells transit from one committed developmental pathway to another (1). This mechanism has been employed by various types of tumor cell to adapt to targeted anticancer therapies (2, 3). Prostate adenocarcinoma usually responds to anti-hormonal therapies but almost always recurs and becomes castration resistant. Some castration resistant prostate cancers undergo lineage plasticity, turn on the expression of the markers for the neuroendocrine cells such as Synaptophysin and Chromogranin A, and become an aggressive variant of prostate cancer called neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) (4–7).A variety of genetic and epigenetic signaling associated with the development of NEPC have been identified, such as loss of function of tumor suppressors TP53 and RB1, activation of the transcription factor N-Myc and BRN2 and epigenetic regulator EZH2 etc. (8). The cell-fate determining transcription factor Sox2 is functionally implicated in the induction and maintenance of various types of stem and progenitor cells (9). It has been shown as a downstream effector of the NEPC-associated genetic and epigenetic alterations to promote the development of NEPC. For example, AR, TP53 and RB1 suppresses the expression of Sox2 whereas N-Myc, BRN2, EZH2, SRRM4 and LIN28b upregulate its expression (10–14). Sox2 has been suggested to promote NEPC development by regulating LSD1 (15). However, a critical role of Sox2 during the transition of prostate adenocarcinoma to NEPC has not been demonstrated directly using genetic engineered mouse models for prostate cancer, partly because of a scarcity of mouse models that recapitulates the androgen ablation-induced transition. In this study, we discovered that the prostate adenocarcinoma derived from Pten null Sca-1+ mouse prostate luminal cells undergo neuroendocrine differentiation upon androgen deprivation. We demonstrated that Sox2 is necessary for the emergence of androgen-deprivation induced NEPC using this model.
Results
Both the Sca-1+ and Sca-1− prostate luminal cells serve as targets for transformation induced by loss of function of Pten
Previously, we discovered a distinct Sca-1+Nkx3.1− luminal cell population that resides in the mouse proximal prostatic duct adjacent to the urethra (16, 17). These cells express Sox2, are replicative quiescent, and possess a facultative bipotent differentiation capacity (16–20). We sought to investigate whether they are equally susceptible as the distal luminal cells to transformation induced by loss of function of the tumor suppressor Pten, a frequent genetic alteration that occurs in the humanprostate cancer. It is easier to distinguish proximal and distal prostatic ducts in the mouse anterior prostate lobe because it is less convoluted than the ventral and dorsolateral lobes. Therefore, although the Sca-1+ luminal cells also exist in the proximal ducts of other lobes (16), all results reported in this study were obtained from the anterior lobe unless stated otherwise.We generated the K8-CreER;Pten compound mice (K8-Pten) to achieve tamoxifen-induced ablation of Pten in both the proximal and distal luminal cells. One month after tamoxifen treatment, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia 1/2 (PIN1/2) formed in both proximal and distal prostatic ducts (N=8, Figure 1A), which progressed to PIN4 lesions and adenocarcinoma 6 months after tamoxifen treatment (N=9, Figure 1A). Co-immunostaining of pAKT and K8 demonstrates successful deletion of Pten in both proximal and distal luminal cells (Figure 1B). PIN lesions derived from both regions are composed of mostly luminal cells that express AR and K8 surrounded by Krt5 or Krt14 positive basal cells (Figure 1C). The expression levels of AR in the two groups are comparable but Nkx3.1 is undetectable in the PIN lesions at the proximal ducts (dot plots, Figure 1C). Interestingly, Sox2 is turned on in the luminal cells in the PIN lesions at distal ducts but the expression level is substantially lower than the endogenous level of Sox2 in the Sca-1+ cells at the proximal duct (Figure 1D). Finally, despite the quiescent property of the proximal luminal cells, the proliferative indices of the tumor cells in the distal and proximal regions are comparable (Figures 1E–F). These results demonstrate that the Sca-1+ and Sca-1− luminal cells are both susceptible to transformation induced by loss of function of Pten.
Figure 1.
Both Sca-1+ and Sca-1− luminal cells can serve as targets for transformation induced by Pten loss.
(A) H&E staining of proximal and distal anterior prostate of K8-Pten mice at 1 and 6 months after tamoxifen treatment (N=8 and 9, respectively). Scale bars:100 μm. (B-C) Co-immunostaining of pAKT/K8 (B), K5/K8 (C, upper), Ar/K14 (C, middle), and Nkx3.1/Smooth muscle actin (SMa) (C, lower) in proximal and distal prostates of K8-Pten mice 6 months after tamoxifen treatment. Scale bars:50 μm. Dot plots show integrated density of staining of Ar (left) and Nkx3.1 (right) (N=8, each dot represents average value from 3 representative images from each mouse). (D) Co-immunostaining of Sox2/K8 in proximal and distal prostates of K8-Pten mice 6 months after tamoxifen treatment. Scale bars:50 μm. Dot plot shows integrated density of staining of Sox2 (N=8, each dot represents average value from 3 representative images from each mouse). (E) Co-immunostaining of Ki67/K5 in proximal and distal prostates of K8-Pten mice 6 months after tamoxifen treatment. Scale bars:50 μm. (F) Dot plot shows means ± SD of percentage of Ki67+ cells in proximal and distal prostates of K8-Pten mice 6 months after tamoxifen treatment (N=8, each dot represents average value from 6 representative images of individual mouse). N.S.: no significance.
Prostate cancer originating from the Sca-1+ luminal cells are castration resistant
The Sca-1+ luminal cells do not rely on androgen for their survival (17, 18, 20). To examine whether tumors derived from the Sca-1+ luminal cells inherit the castration resistant property of their cells of origin, we castrated K8-Ptenmice at 3 months after tamoxifen induction (Figure 2A). Figure 2B shows that the tumor cells in both proximal and distal ducts display a higher nuclear/cytoplasm ratio, which is a typical result of androgen ablation. Immunostaining shows a low to undetectable level of cytoplasmic AR staining after castration, corroborating successful androgen deprivation (Figure 2C). Immunostaining of Ki67 shows that the proliferative indices of the tumors in the proximal and distal regions were reduced by 2.39- and 2.68-fold after castration, respectively, but remained comparable to each other (Figures 1F and 2D). Immunostaining of cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) shows that the apoptotic index of the tumor cells in both regions increased significantly after castration (5.79-fold at proximal region and 41.1-fold at distal region), and the apoptotic index at the distal region is 3.76-fold higher than that in the proximal duct (Figure 2E).
Figure 2.
Prostate cancer derived from Sca-1+ luminal cells displays castration-resistance.
(A) Schematic illustration of experimental design. Tmx: tamoxifen. (B) H&E staining of proximal and distal anterior prostates of castrated K8-Pten mice. Scale bar: 25 μm. (C) Co-immunostaining of Ar/K8 (upper panels) in proximal and distal prostates of intact and castrated K8-Pten mice. Lower panels show Ar staining only. Scale bar: 50 μm. Dot plot shows integrated density of Ar staining (N=8, each dot represents average value from 3 representative images from each mouse). (D-E) Immunostaining of Ki67 (E) and cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) (F) in proximal and distal regions of androgen depleted K8-Pten mice. Scale bars:50 μm. Dot plots show means ± SD of percentage of positively stained cells (N=8, each dot shows average value from 6 representative images of individual mice). N.S.; no significance.
During prostate cancer development, tumor cells may migrate inside the intraductal space, making their origin hard to define. We used an alternative experimental design (Figure 3A) to ensure that the tumors subjected to the study definitively originated from proximal and distal luminal cells, respectively, and used this complementary approach to further corroborate the differential response of the tumors in different regions to androgen ablation. In this approach, proximal and distal prostate tissues were separated and transplanted separately before prostate cancer developed. This excluded the possibility that tumors originating from different regions may migrate and mix. Briefly, we dissected distal and proximal tissue chunks of the same weight from K8-Ptenmice shortly (one week) after tamoxifen treatment and transplanted them under the kidney capsules of immunodeficient male mice, separately (Figure 3A). Three months after the transplantation, host mice were either castrated or underwent mock surgery and the transplanted tissues were incubated for another 3 months in the hosts. Figures 3B–C show that the average sizes/weight of the tumors outgrown from the proximal and distal tissue chunks in intact hosts are comparable, corroborating that they are equally susceptible to transformation. The weight of the distal duct-derived tumors in castrated host is approximately half of that of the tumors grown in intact host, confirming their castration sensitive feature. In contrast, the weight of the tumors derived from the proximal tissues in intact and castrated hosts is comparable, corroborating their castration resistant property.
Figure 3.
Transplantation experiment corroborates that prostate cancer derived from Sca-1+ luminal cells displays castration-resistance.
(A) Schematic illustration of experimental design. Tmx: tamoxifen. (B) Representative transillumination images of tumors outgrown from distal and proximal prostate chunks of tamoxifen-treated K8-Pten mice in host SCID mice underwent mock surgery and androgen deprivation-replacement. Scale bars:5 mm. (C) Dot plot shows means ± SD of weight of tumors (N=6). (D) H&E staining of transplanted tissues in intact or castrated SCID mice. Scale bars:100 μm. (E) Co-immunostaining of pAKT/K8 (upper) and Nkx3.1/Trp63 (lower) of transplants outgrown from proximal and distal prostate of tamoxifen-treated K8-Pten mice in intact and castrated SCID hosts. Scale bars:50 μm. (F) Dot plot shows means ± SD of percentage of Ki67+ cells (N=6, each dot shows average value from 6 representative images from each mouse). (G) Dot plot shows means ± SD of percentage of CC3+ cells (N=6, each dot shows average value from 6 representative images from each mouse). (H) Co-immunostaining of Ar/K8 of transplants outgrown from proximal prostate tissues of tamoxifen-treated K8-Pten mice in intact SCID hosts. Scale bar: 50 μm.
H&E staining and immunostaining of lineage markers show that there was not much difference between the tumors in respective anatomic regions before and after androgen deprivation (Figures 3D–E). The proliferative indices of the tumor cells originating from distal and proximal regions were significantly decreased by 43% and 30%, respectively, after castration but were not significantly different from each other (Figure 3F and Supplementary Figure 1A). The apoptotic indices of the tumors increased in the castration group, but the apoptotic index of the tumors derived from the distal luminal cells was 2.3-fold higher than that of the tumors from the proximal luminal cells after castration (Figure 3G and Supplementary Figure 1B). AR displays a diffusive cytoplasmic staining in the tumors in the castrated hosts versus a clear nuclear staining in the intact groups, confirming the successful androgen deprivation (Supplementary Figure 1C). Another interesting observation in the tumors in intact mice is that there are more AR−Krt8+ tumor cells in the proximal duct-originating tumors than in the distal duct-originating tumors (Figure 3H and Supplementary Figure 1C). Collectively, these results demonstrate that although the proximal and distal luminal cells are equally susceptible to transformation induced by loss of function of Pten, the tumors derived from the proximal luminal cells are relatively resistant to androgen deprivation.
Prostate cancer in proximal prostate of K8-Pten mice undergoes neuroendocrine differentiation in response to androgen deprivation
The neuroendocrine (NE) cells that express Chromogranin A (Chga) are very rare among the PIN lesions in intact K8-Ptenmice (Figure 4A) especially in the distal PIN lesions. This pattern is consistent with the observation that more NE cells are present in the proximal prostatic ducts than in distal ducts in adult wild type mice (Supplementary Figure 2A, p=0.0041). 77.8% of the Chga+ cells are presented as single cells and the rest in clusters of 3–5 cells at the proximal ducts of intact K8-Ptenmice. In contrast, almost all Chga+ cells are presented as single cells in the distal ducts of K8-Ptenmice (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the frequency of the NE cells in proximal duct prostate cancer increased after castration (Figure 4B, p=0.0004 by Mann-Whitney U test, and Supplementary Figure 2B). In addition, about half of the NE cells are now presented in clusters of 3–5 cells and the rest in clusters with more than 10 cells. The expansion of NE cells in proximal duct-originating tumors in response to androgen deprivation was also corroborated in the transplantation experiments shown in Figure. 3A (Figure 4C, p=0.0188 by Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 4.
Androgen deprivation drives neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells at proximal ducts of K8-Pten mice.
(A) Immunostaining of Chga in anterior prostates of K8-Pten mice at 3 months after mock surgery (intact, upper panel) or castration (castration, lower panel) and 6 months after tamoxifen treatment. Scale bar:200 μm. (B) Pie charts show quantification of size of NE colonies (Chga+ or Syp+) in proximal and distal regions of intact (N=9) and castrated (N=10) K8-Pten mice (results summarized from 10–20 representative images per mouse). (C) Co-immunostaining of Sox2/Syp of tumors outgrown from transplanted proximal and distal prostate of tamoxifen-treated K8-Pten mice under kidney capsules of castrated SCID mice. Scale bars:25 μm. Pie charts show quantification of size of NE colonies (Chga+ or Syp+) (N=6, results summarized from 16–30 representative images per mouse). (D) Co-immunostaining of pAKT/Syp (upper) and Pten/Syp (lower) of proximal prostates of castrated K8-Pten mice. Scale bars:25 μm. (E) Co-immunostaining of Ki67/Syp in proximal prostates of castrated K8-Pten mice. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Figure. 4D shows that pAKT is upregulated and Pten is absent in these NE cells. Two possible mechanisms can account for the expansion of NE cells. First, some prostate adenocarcinoma can undergo NE differentiation upon androgen deprivation (5) and upregulation of Sox2 contributes to NE differentiation (10). Therefore, it is possible that the Sox2high cancer cells in proximal prostate are predisposed to NE differentiation, thereby leading to an expansion of NE-like cells after androgen deprivation. Alternatively, the pAKT+ NE cells may originate from the endogenous NE cells directly because of androgen deprivation and Pten ablation. Since there is no expansion of NE cells in both distal and proximal ducts in castrated WT mice (Supplementary Figure 2C), it is unlikely that castration per se can stimulate the proliferation of NE cells. Using the K8-eYFP model we confirmed that some NE cells were labeled with eYFP (Supplementary Figure 2D), suggesting that Pten could be disrupted in the NE cells in the K8-Pten model, too. However, we only observed the expansion of NE cells in the proximal prostate cancer tissues after androgen ablation in both the de novo (Figures 4A and 4B) and transplantation (Figure 4C) models. Therefore, it is also unlikely that disrupting Pten in NE cells promotes their proliferation upon androgen deprivation. Finally, very few NE cells proliferated actively (2 out of 906 cells counted, Figure 4E), further supporting that they may not emerge through self-duplication of NE cells. Co-immunostaining of Syp and CC3 also shows that the Syp+ cells did not undergo apoptosis upon androgen deprivation (Supplementary Fig. 3). Collectively, these results support that the expanded NE cells in the proximal ducts in castrated mice are most likely transdifferentiated from the Sox2high prostate cancer cells and imply that that the Sox2high prostate cancer cells are predisposed to NE differentiation in response to androgen deprivation.
Sox2 is necessary for the androgen-deprivation induced neuroendocrine differentiation
We recently demonstrated that Sox2 is not essential for the maintenance of the prostate epithelial tissues using a K8-CreER;Sox2 compound mouse model (17). Sox2 is not only highly expressed endogenously in the proximal luminal epithelial cells but is also upregulated in the luminal cells in distal ducts in the K8-Pten model (Figure 1D). We investigated whether Sox2 is essential for the initiation and progression of the cancer in proximal and distal ducts in the K8-Pten model. We generated a cohort of K8-CreER;Pten;Sox2 (K8-Pten-Sox2) and K8-Ptenmice. Eight-week-old mice were treated with tamoxifen and aged. Figure. 5A shows that there is no significant difference in prostate weight between the two groups even 6 months after tamoxifen treatment. The PIN lesions in the two groups are histologically indistinguishable (Figure 5B, intact). Immunostaining of Sox2 and pAKT1 confirms that Sox2 and Pten were successfully deleted (Figure 5C, intact). This result indicates that Sox2 is dispensable for the initiation of PIN lesions in both proximal and distal ducts.
Figure 5.
Sox2 is not essential for the castration resistant property.
(A) Dot plot shows means ± SD of prostate weight of intact and castrated K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2 mice (N=8). N.S.: no significance. (B-C) H&E staining (B) and co-immunostaining of Sox2/Trp63 (C, upper panels) and pAKT/K8 (C, lower panels) in intact and castrated K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2 mice. Black bars:100 μm; white bars:25 μm. Dot plot shows the integrated density of Sox2 staining (N=8, each dot represents average value from 3 representative images from each mouse). (D-E) Dot plots show means ± SD of percentages of Ki67+ (D) and CC3+ (E) cells in proximal and distal regions of intact and castrated K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2 mice (N=8, each dot indicates average value from 6 representative images per individual mouse). N.S.: no significance.
To determine whether Sox2 plays a role in proliferation and survival of tumor cells after androgen deprivation, we castrated K8-Pten-Sox2 and K8-Ptenmice 3 months after they were treated with tamoxifen and determined how the prostate tissues responded. Immunostaining of AR and Nkx3.1 confirms successful disruption of AR and its activity (Supplementary Figures 4A and 4B). The PIN lesions in both groups responded to androgen deprivation similarly (Figures 5A–B, castration). Consistent with data shown in Figures 2D and 2E, the proliferative indices at the proximal and distal PIN lesions in intact K8-Ptenmice were comparable and were reduced to a similar extent upon androgen deprivation (Figure 5D and Supplementary Figure 4C), and the apoptotic index in the distal PIN lesions in K8-Ptenmice was higher than that in the proximal PIN lesions upon androgen deprivation (Figure 5E and Supplementary Figure 4C). The proliferative and apoptotic indices of the PIN lesions at different anatomic locations of the K8-Pten-Sox2mice as well as their changes upon androgen deprivation were not significantly different from those of the K8-Ptenmice, respectively (Figures 5D–E, and Supplementary Figure 4C). These results support that Sox2 is not critical for the proliferation and survival of the Pten null tumor cells. To further corroborate the dispensability of Sox2 in proliferation and survival, we performed a similar transplantation experiment as described in Figure 3A and reached the same conclusion (Supplementary Figures 5A–B).The frequency and distribution pattern of the Chga+ or Syp+ neuroendocrine cells are similar in intact K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2mice (Figure 6A–B, intact). As shown previously in Figure 4B, castration drove the expansion of the cells expressing the NE cell markers (Syp and Chga) in the proximal PIN lesions in the K8-Ptenmice (p=0.00676, Mann-Whitney U test). In contrast, although there is also a trend with increased neuroendocrine cell colonies in the K8-Pten-Sox2mice after androgen deprivation, the change is not statistically significant (p=0.0642, Mann-Whitney U test) (Figures 6A–B, castration). Similarly, in the transplantation experiment, we also confirmed that the average size of the NE cell colonies was significantly increased in the transplanted proximal PIN lesions of the K8-Ptenmice (p=0.0222, Mann-Whitney U test) but not in those of the K8-Pten-Sox2mice (p=0.115, Mann-Whitney U test) after androgen deprivation (Figures 6C–D). These results show that Sox2 is necessary for the NE differentiation of the Pten null tumor cells. Of note, the insignificant trend with increased NE colonies in the K8-Pten-Sox2mice after androgen deprivation is either because of an incomplete disruption of Sox2 or implies the contribution of other factors in castration-induced NE differentiation.
Figure 6.
Sox2 is necessary for androgen deprivation-induced neuroendocrine differentiation of Pten-null prostate tumor cells.
(A) Co-immunostaining of Chga/Syp in proximal and distal prostates of intact and castrated K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2 mice. White arrows point to Chga+/Syp+ cells. Scale bars:25 μm. (B) Pie charts show quantification of size of neuroendocrine colony in proximal prostates of intact and castrated K8-Pten and K8-Pten-Sox2 mice (N=8, results summarized from 8–15 representative images per mouse). (C) Co-immunostaining of Chga/Syp of transplanted tissues in intact and castrated SCID mice. Arrows point to neuroendocrine cells. Scale bars=25 μm. (D) Pie charts show quantification of neuroendocrine colony size. N=5–7. Results summarized from 13–25 representative images per mouse.
The cells underwent neuroendocrine differentiation only constituted a small portion of the tumor cells that survived castration. In addition, ablating Sox2 attenuated NE differentiation but did not affect castration resistance. Therefore, it is unlikely that the NE differentiation is the major mechanism of the castration resistance for the proximal prostate tumor cells in the Pten null model. The proximal prostate tumor cells arose from the Sca-1+ luminal cells that do not rely on the androgen signaling for their survival (17). Therefore, it is more likely that these tumor cells inherit an intrinsic capacity for castration resistance from their cell-of-origin.
Discussion
Prostate cancers respond to anti-androgen therapies differently, with some developing resistance faster via transition to NEPC. The molecular mechanisms underlying the heterogeneous responses remains incompletely understood. The cells-of-origin for cancer is generally defined as the cells within a tissue from which cancer originates (21). One interesting theory is that the identity of the cell-of-origin for cancers can determine their clinical behavior (22, 23). Our study shows that both the Sca-1+ and Sca-1− luminal cells can serve as cells-of-origin for transformation, which is consistent with a recent study (24). One unique finding of ours is that the prostate adenocarcinoma derived from the Sca-1+ luminal cells are predisposed to neuroendocrine differentiation upon androgen ablation. We and other have shown that the human prostate luminal cells expressing a high level of TACSTD2 display similar molecular and phenotypic features with the mouseSca-1+ luminal cells (17, 25). Therefore, one intuitive implication from our study is that some humanprostate cancers were inclined to undergo neuroendocrine differentiation when challenged by androgen deprivation probably because they arose from the TACSTD2+ luminal cells. This hypothesis is supported by a recent study showing that high expression of TACSTD2 was associated with biochemical recurrence (26). In addition, our recent study demonstrated directly that, when transduced with activated AKT1 and c-Myc, the TACSTD2high human prostate luminal cells possess a higher potential to undergo lineage plasticity and generate organoids containing distinct clinically relevant prostate tumor cell populations than the TACSTD2low luminal cells (27). Prostate ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is rare but is the second common histological variant of prostatic carcinoma (28, 29). It is an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer with higher risk of disease progression. PDAs predominantly locate in the periurethral zone of prostate and some of PDAs express KRT7 (30, 31). Interestingly, our current and recent studies show that the mouseSca-1+ and human TACSTD2high luminal cells are both preferentially enriched in the periurethral zones and specifically express Krt7 (17). We showed that tumors derived from these two types of luminal cell are castration resistant and display a higher propensity for lineage plasticity. Therefore, it is tempting to hypothesize that these cells may serve as the cell-of-origin for PDAs.Nevertheless, this cell-of-origin hypothesis should not exclusively account for the heterogenous response of prostate cancers to therapies, especially the intra-patient heterogeneity of response. An alternative implication from our study is that the cellular state of cancer cells determines their potential to exhibit lineage plasticity. This has been shown in previous studies that the genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with NEPC often rewire the global transcriptional profiles of the cancer cells, which either facilitates or directly drives the transition of cellular identity (8). SOX2 has been shown as an AR-repressed gene (32). The dosage of Sox2 is also important for cell fate determination (33). Androgen deprivation may upregulate SOX2 expression to different levels among tumor cells, thereby affecting their potential to undergo NE differentiation. Since SOX2 is highly expressed in the humanprostate cancer cell lines that do not display an NE phenotype (34), we reason that SOX2 more likely facilitates NE differentiation rather than directly driving NE differentiation.Currently, there are only a few mouse models for de novo or castration induced NEPC. Most of the models incorporated genetic alterations associated with human NEPC, such as knockout or loss of function of Trp53 and Rb1 and increased activity of N-Myc (6, 13, 35–37). The prostate specific Pten null mice was widely used as a model for prostate adenocarcinoma but not NEPC (38–40). We were able to discover the rare NEPC feature induced by castration in this genetic context for two reasons. First, the castration induced NEPC only occurs in the proximal region which may be overlooked in previous studies; second, the Sca-1+ luminal cells do not express Nkx3.1 and Probasin, therefore cannot be targeted in the models using the Pbsn-Cre and Nkx3.1-CreER lines (38, 41). The Sca-1+ luminal cells highly express Sox2, which confers them a higher potential for being reprogramed to neuroendocrine lineages. Interesting, a previous study has suggested that a SoxC member Sox11 may also play a role in the emergence of NEPC in a mouse model for prostate cancer with dual knockout of Pten and Trp53 (6).Besides the intrinsic property of the Sca-1+ luminal cells, their tissue microenvironment may also contribute to the formation of NEPC. We showed that the stromal cells in the proximal prostate where the Sca-1+ luminal cells reside express high levels of various Wnt ligands (42). The turnover rate of the epithelial cells in the proximal regions is extremely low under physiological conditions, partly because of the activation of the epithelial cell intrinsic non-canonical Wnt signaling. But in the context of oncogenic transformation, the Wnt ligands secreted by the stromal cells may activate Wnt signaling in the Pten null tumor cells to promote NE differentiation, which has been reported previously (43). Interestingly, the tumor cells that express the NE cell markers are mostly mitotic inert in our model, which is consistent with an observation made in the prostate cancermouse model induced by loss of function of Pten and Tp53 (6). This may be partly accounted for by previous studies showing that SOX2 confers tumor cell dormancy in certain genetic contexts (33). Future studies will be performed to further investigate the molecular mechanisms regulating the emergence and expansion of the NEPC in mouse models.
Materials and Methods
Mice
The C57Bl/6, Gt(ROSA)26Sor, Sox2J and Pten/J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). The SCID/Beige mice were purchased from Charles River (Wilmington, MA). The K8-CreER mice were generated by our group previously (Zhang et al, 2012). All mice are on C57Bl/6 background unless stated otherwise. Mice were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction using mouse genomic DNA from tail biopsy specimens. The sequences of genotyping primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1. PCR products were separated electophoretically on 1% agarose gels and visualized via ethidium bromide under UV light.
Tamoxifen treatment and androgen deprivation
Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in corn oil and administrated i.p. into experimental mice at the specified age (K8-eYFP: 2mg/40g/day for 4 consecutive days, K8-Pten, and K8-Pten-Sox2: 7mg/40g/day for 4 consecutive days). For androgen deprivation, experimental mice were castrated using standard techniques as described previously (Kwon et al., 2016)
Prostate tissue transplantation under kidney capsule
The proximal and distal prostatic tissue chunks (2–3 mm) from anterior lobes of tamoxifen-treated K8-Pten or K8-Pten-Sox2mice were weighed and grafted under the renal capsules of SCID/Beige mice as described previously (44). Three months later, host mice were either castrated or underwent mock surgery. Tissues were collected after another 3-month incubation.
Histology and Immunostaining
Murine prostate tissues were fixed by 10% buffered formalin and paraffin embedded. H&E staining and immunofluorescence staining were performed using standard protocols on 5-μm paraffin sections. Slides were incubated with 5% normal goat serum (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) and with primary antibodies diluted in 3% normal goat serum overnight at 4°C. Information for primary antibodies is listed in Supplementary Table 2. Slides were then incubated with secondary antibodies (diluted 1:500 in 0.05% tween 20 in PBS) labeled with Alexa Fluor 488, 568, 594, or 633 (Invitrogen/Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Sections were counterstained with NucBlue™ Fixed Cell ReadyProbes™ Reagent (Thermo Fisher). Immuno-fluorescence staining was imaged using Leica DM4B fluorescent microscope or LeicaSP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). All representative images were quantified by the Image J software.
Statistics
All experiments were performed using 4–10 mice in independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD or mean ± SEM. Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine significance between groups. All p values reported were two-sided unless otherwise noted. For all statistical tests, the 0.05 level of confidence was accepted for statistical significance.
Study approval
All the mice used in this study received humane care in compliance with the principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH Publication, 1996 edition, and the protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee at the University of Washington.
Authors: Himisha Beltran; Andrew Hruszkewycz; Howard I Scher; Jeffrey Hildesheim; Jennifer Isaacs; Evan Y Yu; Kathleen Kelly; Daniel Lin; Adam Dicker; Julia Arnold; Toby Hecht; Max Wicha; Rosalie Sears; David Rowley; Richard White; James L Gulley; John Lee; Maria Diaz Meco; Eric J Small; Michael Shen; Karen Knudsen; David W Goodrich; Tamara Lotan; Amina Zoubeidi; Charles L Sawyers; Charles M Rudin; Massimo Loda; Timothy Thompson; Mark A Rubin; Abdul Tawab-Amiri; William Dahut; Peter S Nelson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dong Lin; Alexander W Wyatt; Hui Xue; Yuwei Wang; Xin Dong; Anne Haegert; Rebecca Wu; Sonal Brahmbhatt; Fan Mo; Lina Jong; Robert H Bell; Shawn Anderson; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Ladan Fazli; Manju Sharma; Himisha Beltran; Mark Rubin; Michael Cox; Peter W Gout; James Morris; Larry Goldenberg; Stanislav V Volik; Martin E Gleave; Colin C Collins; Yuzhuo Wang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ping Mu; Zeda Zhang; Matteo Benelli; Wouter R Karthaus; Elizabeth Hoover; Chi-Chao Chen; John Wongvipat; Sheng-Yu Ku; Dong Gao; Zhen Cao; Neel Shah; Elizabeth J Adams; Wassim Abida; Philip A Watson; Davide Prandi; Chun-Hao Huang; Elisa de Stanchina; Scott W Lowe; Leigh Ellis; Himisha Beltran; Mark A Rubin; David W Goodrich; Francesca Demichelis; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Science Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Belinda A Waltman; Dora Dias-Santagata; Subba Digumarthy; Alexa B Turke; Panos Fidias; Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Scott Gettinger; Arjola K Cosper; Sara Akhavanfard; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Temel; James G Christensen; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Kathy Vernovsky; Eugene J Mark; Michael Lanuti; A John Iafrate; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Min Zou; Roxanne Toivanen; Antonina Mitrofanova; Nicolas Floch; Sheida Hayati; Yanping Sun; Clémentine Le Magnen; Daniel Chester; Elahe A Mostaghel; Andrea Califano; Mark A Rubin; Michael M Shen; Cory Abate-Shen Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: David J Konieczkowski; Cory M Johannessen; Omar Abudayyeh; Jong Wook Kim; Zachary A Cooper; Adriano Piris; Dennie T Frederick; Michal Barzily-Rokni; Ravid Straussman; Rizwan Haq; David E Fisher; Jill P Mesirov; William C Hahn; Keith T Flaherty; Jennifer A Wargo; Pablo Tamayo; Levi A Garraway Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Álvaro Quintanal-Villalonga; Joseph M Chan; Helena A Yu; Dana Pe'er; Charles L Sawyers; Triparna Sen; Charles M Rudin Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Xing Wei; Martine P Roudier; Oh-Joon Kwon; Justin Daho Lee; Kevin Kong; Ruth Dumpit; Lawrence True; Colm Morrissey; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Li Xin Journal: Prostate Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Jack Freeland; Preston D Crowell; Jenna M Giafaglione; Paul C Boutros; Andrew S Goldstein Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Mark P Labrecque; Joshi J Alumkal; Ilsa M Coleman; Peter S Nelson; Colm Morrissey Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 5.900
Authors: William K Storck; Allison M May; Thomas C Westbrook; Zhi Duan; Colm Morrissey; Joel A Yates; Joshi J Alumkal Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 6.055