| Literature DB >> 33109078 |
Adriana Chiarelli1,2,3, Nicolas Cabanel1,2, Isabelle Rosinski-Chupin1,2, Pengdbamba Dieudonné Zongo1,2, Thierry Naas1,4, Rémy A Bonnin1,4, Philippe Glaser5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae is a leading cause of intractable hospital-acquired multidrug-resistant infections and carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (CPKp) are particularly feared. Most of the clinical isolates produce capsule as a major virulence factor. Recombination events at the capsule locus are frequent and responsible for capsule diversity within Klebsiella spp. Capsule diversity may also occur within clonal bacterial populations generating differences in colony aspect. However, little is known about this phenomenon of phenotypic variation in CPKp and its consequences.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm; Capsule; Carbapenem; Insertion sequence; Klebsiella pneumoniae
Year: 2020 PMID: 33109078 PMCID: PMC7590720 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-020-02007-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Capsular loci maps. Capsular regions from the seven capsular types investigated in this work are represented from galF to ugd. Genes are indicated by arrows. Blue arrows correspond to core genes from the different capsule loci. Glycosyltransferases are indicated in green. Orange and red arrows represent genes encoding the polymerase and the flippase, respectively. In yellow/dark yellow the genes involved in sugar/repeat unit synthesis (non-conserved). KL numbers are indicated on the left and the analyzed strain of each K-type on the right. IS insertions are represented by triangles and other mutations events by stars as specified in Table 2. Two strains of capsular type KL8 were investigated, blue signs correspond to KPA28006 and black ones to KPA28008
Mutations in the capsule synthesis cluster detected in non-mucoid variants
| Strain | NM Variant | Gene | Mutationa, b |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNR128G5 | NM1 | IS | |
| NM2 | IS | ||
| NM3 | G1699T (D567Y) | ||
| IS | |||
| NM5 | Δ4 bp (AAAC) (pos 729); (*) | ||
| NM6 | IS | ||
| NM7 | ΔA (pos 38); (*) | ||
| NM8 | IS | ||
| NM9 | IS | ||
| NM10 | insAAd (pos 744); (*) | ||
| NM11 | IS | ||
| CNR152A1 | NM1 | IS | |
| IS | |||
| NM3 | T389A (I130N); G452C (G151A) | ||
| NM4 | IS | ||
| NM5 | IS | ||
| NM6 | G118T; (*) | ||
| NM7 | insAd (pos 811); (*) | ||
| CNR105A6 | NM1 | IS | |
| NM2 | IS | ||
| NM3 | IS | ||
| IS | |||
| NM5 | IS | ||
| NM6 | IS1-like (pos 316) | ||
| NM7 | T997G (S333A) | ||
| NM8 | Δ18bp (pos 190–208); (*) | ||
| NM9 | IS | ||
| NM10 | IS | ||
| NM11 | C79A (V27L) | ||
| KPA28006 | IS | ||
| NM2 | IS | ||
| NM3 | IS | ||
| NM4 | ΔC (pos 274); (*) | ||
| NM5 | ΔC (pos 274); (*) | ||
| NM6 | ΔA (pos 339); (*) | ||
| NM7 | ΔA (pos 1279); (*) | ||
| NM8 | ΔA (pos 422); (*) | ||
| NM9 | A278T (L93Q) | ||
| KPA28008 | NM1 | IS | |
| NM2 | IS | ||
| NM3 | IS | ||
| IS | |||
| NM5 | IS | ||
| NM6 | IS | ||
| CNR149J2 | NM1 | C447A (*) | |
| NM2 | T345A (*) | ||
| Δ11bp (pos 635); (*) | |||
| NM4 | G787C (A263P) | ||
| NM5 | IS | ||
| NM6 | T1145G (L382R) | ||
| NM7 | A111T (*) | ||
| NM8 | IS | ||
| NM9 | IS | ||
| NM10 | T68G (L23R) | ||
| CNR137J2 | NM1 | IS | |
| NM2 | IS | ||
| NM3 | IS | ||
| NM4 | IS | ||
| NM5 | IS | ||
| IS | |||
| NM7 | IS | ||
| NM8 | IS | ||
| KP1 | NM1 | IS | |
| NM2 | T736C (S246P) | ||
| NM3 | ΔT (pos 864); (*) | ||
| NM4 | ΔT (pos 864); (*) | ||
| NM5 | ΔT (pos 857); (*) | ||
| ΔT (pos 864); (*) | |||
| NM7 | ΔT (pos 864); (*) | ||
| NM8 | ΔT (pos 864); (*) | ||
| NM9 | A31T; (*) | ||
| NM10 | ΔA (pos 16); (*) |
aIn parentheses are indicated: for point mutations, the amino acid change and for other mutations, the position in the gene, b the star indicates either a non-sense mutation or a frameshift c; NM variant selected for in depth phenotypic analysis (in bold); d Ins for insertion; eIS1-like correspond to IS1R, IS1SD, IS1F, ISKpn14 and closely related ISs
Strains analyzed in this work
| Strain | STa | wzi | K-typeb | Resistance genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KP1 [ SAMN14419408 | ST39 | wzi83 | KL23 | |
CNR128G5 SAMN14419403 | ST383 | wzi162 | KL122 | |
CNR152A1 SAMN14419404 | ST147 | wzi64 | KL64 | |
CNR105A6 SAMN14419407 | ST855 | wzi100 | KL10 | |
KPA28006 [ SAMN14419405 | ST11 | wzi334 | KL8 | |
KPA28008 [ SAMN14419406 | ST11 | wzi334 | KL8 | |
CNR149J2 SAMN14419409 | ST16 | wzi50 | KL51 | |
CNR137J2 SAMN14419410 | ST107 | wzi173 | KL102 |
&Sequence accession numbers are also indicated, aST = Sequence Type; bK-type = capsular type
Fig. 2Frequency of phenotypic switch in the eight CPKp isolates. a. Left: Workflow followed to visualize and quantify the colony switch from mucoid to non-mucoid phenotype; right: two colonies with NM sectors. b. Frequency of phenotypic variation (colony with non-mucoid sectors) monitored over 72 h in the eight CPKp strains. The first 24 h, the isolates were incubated at 37 °C then at 25 °C to observe the appearance of NM segments. M = mucoid, NM = non-mucoid. Strain names are indicated according to the figure key. Frequency and standard deviations are given in Table S4
Fig. 3Capsule quantification and visualization in M and NM variants. Uronic acid assay [25] was carried out to quantify capsular polysaccharides in the eight CPKp and their selected NM variants. In all but one couple (KP1), the NM variant exhibited a significant decrease in CPS production compared to the WT isolate. In particular, a stronger difference was noticed in the case of CNR128G5 (p-value ****), followed by CNR137J2 and KPA28006. India ink staining was performed to visually detect decrease/absence of capsule in the non-mucoid variant (right image). The scale bar in each image represent 5 μm. Non-mucoid isolates selected for each K. pneumoniae strain showed different mutation events (Table 2). M = mucoid, NM = non-mucoid
Fig. 4In vitro biofilm production and autoaggregation. a. The WT isolates and the selected NM variants were characterized for their ability to produce biofilm in M63 minimal medium supplemented with glucose. In six out of eight couples (CNR152A1, CNR105A6, KPA28006, KPA28008, CNR137J2 and KP1), the NM variant was more efficient in biofilm formation than the parental M strain. Only CNR149J2 showed an opposite trend: the M variant showed a better ability to form biofilm under tested conditions. p-values of < 0.001 ***, < 0.01 ** and < 0.05 * were considered significant. b. Autoaggregation assay of M and NM variant in spent M63/Glu medium. M = mucoid, NM = non-mucoid are indicated according to the figure key
Fig. 5Carbapenem susceptibility profiles of the eight CPKp strains and their NM variants. a. The carbapenem susceptibility of the eight CPKp strains and the NM variants was quantified by E-test. ETP = ertapenem; IPM = imipenem and MER = meropenem. Four out of eight NM variants selected showed an increase in susceptibility towards the carbapenem tested, whereas the NM deriving from CNR149J2, CNR137J2 and KP1 did not show any difference compared to the WT mucoid strain. Only CNR152A1-NM2 showed a different behavior, with decreased susceptibility, particularly against meropenem and ertapenem. b. Carbapenem susceptibility by E-test of the seven NM variants derivatives of CNR152A1. M = mucoid, NM = non-mucoid. Experiments were performed in triplicates. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM)