Literature DB >> 33108696

Professionals' experience with conscientious objection to abortion in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: An interview study.

Morten Magelssen, Demelash Bezabih Ewnetu.   

Abstract

In Ethiopia, conscientious objection (CO) to abortion provision is not allowed due to government regulations. We here report findings from a qualitative interview study of 30 healthcare professionals from different professions working with abortion in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. CO is practised despite the regulations forbidding it. Most informants appeared to be unfamiliar with the prohibition or else did not accord it weight in their moral reasoning. Proponents of institutionalization/toleration of CO claimed that accommodation was often feasible in a hospital setting because colleagues could take over. Opponents pointed to threats to patient access in rural settings especially. Both proponents and opponents invoked tenets of professional ethics, viz., the right not to be coerced into actions one deems unacceptable, or the duty to provide care, respectively. More societal and professional discussion of the ethics and regulation of CO, and a clearer link between legal regulation and ethical guidance for professionals, are called for.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethiopia; abortion; conscientious objection

Year:  2020        PMID: 33108696     DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  1 in total

1.  Navigating abortion law dilemmas: experiences and attitudes among Ethiopian health care professionals.

Authors:  Demelash Bezabih Ewnetu; Viva Combs Thorsen; Jan Helge Solbakk; Morten Magelssen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.