Literature DB >> 33108501

Expected Reduction of The Nipple-Areolar Complex Over Time After Treatment of Gynecomastia with Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Mastectomy Compared to Subcutaneous Mastectomy Alone.

Peter P Pfeiler1,2, Rosalia Luketina3, Khaled Dastagir4, Peter M Vogt4, Tobias R Mett4, Alexander Kaltenborn4, Sören Könneker4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The enlarged nipple-areola-complex (NAC) is a characterizing aspect of gynecomastia.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to multidimensionally quantify the reduction of the NAC after a subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM) with or without ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective assessment of patients who underwent SCM +/- UAL due to gynecomastia over a period of 11 years was conducted. The NAC diameters were measured before and after surgery. In addition, a survey (including the BREAST-Q) regarding patient-oriented outcome was performed.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 55 men and resulting 105 NACs (SCM n=63, SCM+UAL n=42). It could be shown that the reduction of the NAC considering all parameters (horizontal and vertical diameter and the area) was significantly larger (p=<0.001) in the SCM+UAL compared to the SCM only cohort. The mean reduction of the area in the SCM cohort was 1.60cm2 (SD 1.48) or 23.37% (SD 9.78) after 5.82 years and in the SCM+UAL cohort 2.60cm2 (SD 1.60) or 35.85% (SD 6,86) after 7.43 years. As independent significant factors for reduction of the NAC, the resection weight and SCM+UAL combination were identified. There were no significant differences regarding the patients' satisfaction measured with the BODY-Q (p=0.222) and the ordinal scale (p=0.445) between the two cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The SCM with UAL showed a larger reduction over time of the NAC compared to the SCM independent from the stage of gynecomastia. When planning the surgical treatment of gynecomastia, a technique and resection weight dependent reduction of the NAC over time must be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecomastia; Liposuction; Nipple-areolar complex; Subcutaneous mastectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33108501     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-02029-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.708


  21 in total

Review 1.  Male breast disease.

Authors:  Gilbert J Wise; Andrew K Roorda; Robert Kalter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Gynecomastia.

Authors:  Glenn D Braunstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Gynaecomastia--pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Harmeet S Narula; Harold E Carlson
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia.

Authors:  B E Simon; S Hoffman; S Kahn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Gynecomastia: clinicopathologic study of 351 cases.

Authors:  G A Bannayan; S I Hajdu
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Adolescent gynecomastia: not only an obesity issue.

Authors:  Heather Rosen; Michelle L Webb; Amy D DiVasta; Arin K Greene; Christopher B Weldon; Harry Kozakewich; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; Brian I Labow
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  The Effect of Surgical Treatment for Gynecomastia on Quality of Life in Adolescents.

Authors:  Laura C Nuzzi; Joseph M Firriolo; Carolyn M Pike; Felecia E Cerrato; Amy D DiVasta; Brian I Labow
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 8.  A systematic review of literature on psychosocial aspects of gynecomastia in adolescents and young men.

Authors:  Lynn Rew; Cara Young; Tracie Harrison; Robert Caridi
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2015-07-05

9.  How happy are patients with their gynaecomastia reduction surgery?

Authors:  H Ridha; R J I Colville; M J J Vesely
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  Gynecomastia and psychological functioning: A review of the literature.

Authors:  D Luis Ordaz; J Kevin Thompson
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2015-09-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Dario Melita; Marco Innocenti
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Total Gynecomastia Removal with Layered Closure: A Study of 567 Cases.

Authors:  Robert C Caridi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.