J C Zhang1, N Carnide2, L Holness1,3, P Cram4,5. 1. Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Centre for Research Expertise in Occupational Disease, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the association of cannabis use with automobile accidents has been well-studied, the impact of cannabis on workplace safety and injuries is less clear. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work-related injury and cannabis use in the past year. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013-16) of working individuals. We used multiple logistic regression modelling to calculate the odds of experiencing a work-related injury (defined as non-repetitive strain injury) among workers who reported using cannabis more than once during the prior 12 months as compared to non-users. We repeated the analysis among participants working in high injury risk occupational groups only. RESULTS: Among the 136 536 working participants, 2577 (2%) had a work-related injury in the last 12 months. Of these 2577 who had a work-related injury, 4% also reported being a cannabis user in the same period. We found no association between past-year cannabis use and work-related injury (odds ratio for work injury among users 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.99). The association was unchanged in the subgroup analysis limited to high injury risk occupational groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that cannabis users experienced higher rates of work-related injuries. While awaiting prospective studies, occupational medicine practitioners should take a risk-based approach to drafting workplace cannabis policies.
BACKGROUND: Although the association of cannabis use with automobile accidents has been well-studied, the impact of cannabis on workplace safety and injuries is less clear. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between work-related injury and cannabis use in the past year. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2013-16) of working individuals. We used multiple logistic regression modelling to calculate the odds of experiencing a work-related injury (defined as non-repetitive strain injury) among workers who reported using cannabis more than once during the prior 12 months as compared to non-users. We repeated the analysis among participants working in high injury risk occupational groups only. RESULTS: Among the 136 536 working participants, 2577 (2%) had a work-related injury in the last 12 months. Of these 2577 who had a work-related injury, 4% also reported being a cannabis user in the same period. We found no association between past-year cannabis use and work-related injury (odds ratio for work injury among users 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.99). The association was unchanged in the subgroup analysis limited to high injury risk occupational groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that cannabis users experienced higher rates of work-related injuries. While awaiting prospective studies, occupational medicine practitioners should take a risk-based approach to drafting workplace cannabis policies.
Authors: Gregorio Barrio; Eladio Jiménez-Mejías; José Pulido; Pablo Lardelli-Claret; María J Bravo; Luis de la Fuente Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2012-02-02
Authors: Robert E Mann; Gina Stoduto; Anca Ialomiteanu; Mark Asbridge; Reginald G Smart; Christine M Wickens Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.491
Authors: M Fransen; B Wilsmore; J Winstanley; M Woodward; R Grunstein; S Ameratunga; R Norton Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Jennan A Phillips; Michael G Holland; Debra D Baldwin; Linda Gifford-Meuleveld; Kathryn L Mueller; Brett Perkison; Mark Upfal; Marianne Dreger Journal: Workplace Health Saf Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 1.413