Literature DB >> 33107614

Comparing two sample pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection for efficient screening of COVID-19.

Fenghua Chen1, Zhi Geng1, Jian Wang1, Wenbo Liuchang1, Da Huang1, Yuandong Xu1, Zheng Wang2, Lin Wang1.   

Abstract

The emerging pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 200 countries and resulted in a shortage of diagnostic resources globally. Rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is vital to control the spreading of the disease, which, however, is challenged by limited detection capacity and low detection efficiency in many parts of the world. The pooling test may offer an economical and effective approach to increase the virus testing capacity of medical laboratories without requiring more laboratory resources such as laboratory workers, testing reagents, and equipment. In this study, the sample pools of 6 and 10 were detected by a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay targeting ORF1ab and N genes of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Each pool consisted of five or nine negative SARS-CoV-2 samples and one positive counterpart with varying viral loads. Two different strategies of sample pooling were investigated and the results were compared comprehensively. One approach was to pool the viral transport medium of the samples in the laboratory, and the other was to pool swab samples during the collection process. For swab pooling strategy, qualitative results of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, specific tests of ORF1ab and N genes, remained stable over the different pool sizes. Together, this study demonstrates that the swab pooling strategy may serve as an effective and economical approach for screening SARS-CoV-2 infections in large populations, especially in countries and regions where medical resources are limited during the pandemic and may thus be potential for clinical laboratory applications.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; RT-PCR test; SARS-CoV-2; sample pooling strategy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33107614     DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  7 in total

1.  Effective bubble-based testing for SARS-CoV-2 using swab-pooling.

Authors:  Yuval Cohen; Nadav Bamberger; Orna Mor; Ronen Walfisch; Shay Fleishon; Itay Varkovitzky; Asaf Younger; Danit Oz Levi; Yishai Kohn; David M Steinberg; Danny Zeevi; Oran Erster; Ella Mendelson; Zvi Livneh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 13.310

2.  Development of a high sensitivity RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled nasopharyngeal samples.

Authors:  Harindi Jayakody; Daniel Rowland; Clint Pereira; Rachel Blackwell; Tomasz Lasota; Mark Laverick; Laurence Tisi; Hannah S Leese; Alistair D S Walsham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing of pooled saliva samples: A case study of 824 asymptomatic individuals and a questionnaire survey in Japan.

Authors:  Junna Oba; Hiroaki Taniguchi; Masae Sato; Masaki Takanashi; Moe Yokemura; Yasunori Sato; Hiroshi Nishihara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  SARS-CoV-2 surveillance by RT-qPCR-based pool testing of saliva swabs (lollipop method) at primary and special schools-A pilot study on feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Anika Kästner; Petra Lücker; Martina Sombetzki; Manja Ehmke; Nicole Koslowski; Swantje Mittmann; Arne Hannich; Antje Schwarz; Kristian Meinck; Lena Schmeyers; Katrin Schmidt; Emil C Reisinger; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Misdiagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review of the Influence of Sampling and Clinical Detection Methods.

Authors:  Daniel Keaney; Shane Whelan; Karen Finn; Brigid Lucey
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 6.  Latest Effective Measures to Combat COVID-19: A Review.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Yingjie Liu; Bailiu Ya; Jiarui He; Taiyang Leng; Yike Sun; Qing Xin
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.429

7.  Pooled sputum to optimise the efficiency and utility of rapid, point-of-care molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Authors:  Alison Burdett; Christofer Toumazou; Gary W Davies; Luke S P Moore; Rashmita Sahoo; Adam Mujan; Tsz-Kin Hon; Judith Bedzo-Nutakor; Nicola Casali; Maria Karvela; Mohammadreza Sohbati; Graham S Cooke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.