Literature DB >> 3310750

Intravenous versus nebulized terbutaline in patients with acute severe asthma; a double-blind randomized study.

D Van Renterghem1, H Lamont, W Elinck, R Pauwels, M Van der Straeten.   

Abstract

Twenty-three patients with acute severe asthma were treated in a randomized double-blind way by either intravenous terbutaline two times at an hour interval 6 micrograms/kg or inhaled terbutaline two times 0.1 mg/kg. Peak expiratory flow rate in percent of expected value rose from 89 L/min to 128 L/min (P less than .01) in the intravenous group and from 97 L/min to 122 L/min (P less than .02) in the inhalation group; this was comparable for both groups. PaO2 initially was 7.55 kPa in the intravenous group and rose by 1.4 after 60 minutes (P less than .02) and by 1.33 after 120 minutes (P less than .01). The mean PaO2 did not change in the inhalation group. The pulse rate and blood pressure did not vary significantly in either of the two groups. We conclude that both the intravenous and inhalational administration of terbutaline are effective in acute severe asthma, but that the intravenous route is possibly better for increasing PaO2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3310750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy        ISSN: 0003-4738


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic management of the hospitalized pediatric asthma patient.

Authors:  K A Hardin; H J Kallas; R J McDonald
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Status asthmaticus. From the emergency department to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  N Kenyon; T E Albertson
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Nebulisers for asthma.

Authors:  M J Ward
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.