| Literature DB >> 33107487 |
Swati Kulkarni1, Bhavika Choudhary1, Harita Gogri1, Jayashree Sharma2, Manisha Madkaikar1.
Abstract
Background & objectives: Patients with thalasssaemia are at a risk of alloimmunization and the presence of RBC alloantibodies further complicates transfusion therapy. Matching for the critical antigens of Rh, Kell, Kidd and Duffy blood group systems has been shown to minimize alloimmunization. The aim of the present study was to create a database of extensively typed donors for clinically significant and common blood group antigens of Rh, Kidd, Kell and Duffy systems for transfusion therapy of multitransfused thalassaemic patients.Entities:
Keywords: Alloimmunization; antigen-matched blood; blood groups; blood phenotypes database; inventory; multitransfused thalassaemics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33107487 PMCID: PMC7881817 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1199_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
FigurePer cent distribution of Rh antigens (D, C, E, c and e), Duffy (Fya and Fyb), Kell (K and k) and Kidd (Jka and Jkb) antigens in O group regular blood donors enrolled in the present study.
Number of antigen-matched donors available for alloimmunized patients (n=15)
| Patient number | Antigen profile (genotype) | Number of antigen-matched donors available | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 17 |
| 2 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 24 |
| 3 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a−b+) | K−k+ | 8 |
| 4 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 8 |
| 5 | R1R1 | Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 2 |
| 6 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a−b+) | K−k+ | 8 |
| 7 | R1R2 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 5 |
| 8 | R0r | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 1 |
| 9 | R1r | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 11 |
| 10 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 16 |
| 11 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 16 |
| 12 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | K−k+ | 35 |
| 13 | R2r | Fy(a−b−) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 3 |
| 14 | R1r | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 11 |
| 15 | R1R1 | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b−) | K−k+ | 28 |
Extended antigen-matched donors for common antigens of Rh, Duffy, Kell and Kidd blood group systems for thalassaemic patients (n=84)
| Rh phenotype | Duffy, Kidd and Kell phenotype | Number of thalassaemia patients | Number of antigen-matched donors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1R1 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 7 | 35 |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 7 | 28 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 7 | 35 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 7 | 36 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 17 | 56 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 1 | 8 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 1 | 8 | |
| R1r | Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 3 | 29 |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 3 | 21 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk (a−b+) | kk | 2 | 11 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 2 | 23 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 4 | 28 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 1 | 8 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 1 | 11 | |
| R1R2 | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 3 | 11 |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 3 | 10 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 2 | 6 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 2 | 7 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 1 | 3 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 2 | 6 | |
| Ror | Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 1 | 3 |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 1 | 2 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 1 | 2 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 1 | 3 | |
| Fy(a+b−) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 1 | 5 | |
| Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a−b+) | kk | 1 | 3 | |
| Fy(a+b+) | Jk(a+b+) | kk | 1 | 4 | |
| R2r | Fy(a−b+) | Jk(a+b−) | kk | 1 | 3 |
Comparison of Rh phenotype frequencies with different ethnic groups and parts of India
| Phenotype | North | South | East | West | Caucasians (Reid and Lomas-Francis 2004) | Africans (Reid and Lomas-Francis 2004) | Chinese (Lin-Chu | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thakral | Makroo | Gundrajukuppam | Nag and Das 2012 | Kahar and Patel 2014 | Present study (Mumbai) (n=500) | |||||
| Weiner | Fisher-race | Percentage proportion | ||||||||
| R1R1 | 43.8 | 42.6 | 43.4 | 49.4 | 40.87 | 44.0 | 18.5 | 2.0 | 47.5 | |
| R1r | 30.0 | 32.2 | 31.2 | 27.0 | 23.48 | 30.2 | 34.9 | 21.0 | 8.1 | |
| R2r | 8.95 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 6.8 | 11.8 | 18.6 | 2.0 | |
| R1R2 | 8.22 | 14.5 | 10.7 | 11.0 | 13.91 | 10.2 | 13.3 | 4.0 | 34.4 | |
| R2R2 | 1.45 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 5.9 | |
| R0r | 0.97 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 0.87 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 45.8 | 0.3 | |
| rr | 5.81 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 11.30 | 5.6 | 15.1 | 6.8 | 0.2 | |
| r’r | 0.56 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.4 | |
Comparison of Duffy, Kell and Kidd phenotypes with different Indian populations
| Phenotype | Indian population | Caucasians (Reid and Lomas- Francis 2004) | Africans (Reid and Lomas- Francis 2004) | Chinese (Lin Chu | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thakral | Makroo | Agarwal | Kahar and Patel 2014 | Present Study (Mumbai) (n=500) | ||||
| Percentage proportion | ||||||||
| Duffy | ||||||||
| Fy(a+b−) | 43.85 | 42.1 | 36.22 | 37.39 | 49.4 | 17.0 | 9.0 | 91.0 |
| Fy(a−b+) | 13.25 | 12.3 | 15.36 | 4.35 | 15.2 | 34.0 | 22.0 | 0.3 |
| Fy(a+b+) | 42.90 | 45 | 48.03 | 9.57 | 35.4 | 49.0 | 1.0 | 8.9 |
| Fy(a−b−) | 0 | 0.3 | 0.39 | 48.69 | 0 | Rare | 68.0 | 0 |
| Kidd | ||||||||
| Jk(a+b−) | 33.44 | 32.5 | 30.71 | 28.69 | 35.8 | 28.0 | 57.0 | 23.2 |
| Jk(a−b+) | 17.35 | 18.5 | 22.83 | 19.13 | 18.6 | 23.0 | 9.0 | 26.8 |
| Jk(a+b+) | 49.21 | 48.9 | 46.06 | 52.17 | 45.6 | 49.0 | 34.0 | 49.1 |
| Jk(a−b−) | 0 | Rare | 0.39 | 0 | 0 | Rare | Rare | 0.9 |
| Kell | ||||||||
| K+k+ | 5.68 | 3.5 | 1.97 | 6.09 | 0.4 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 0 |
| K−k+ | 94.32 | 96.5 | 98.03 | 93.91 | 99.6 | 91.0 | 98.0 | 100 |
| K+k− | 0 | Rare | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | Rare | Rare |