Luca Laudani1, Lorenzo Rum2,3, Maria Stella Valle4, Andrea Macaluso3, Giuseppe Vannozzi3, Antonino Casabona4. 1. Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. llaudani@cardiffmet.ac.uk. 2. Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. 3. Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals' ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation. METHODS: Ten young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography. RESULTS: Older participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.62) and duration (p = 0.001; η2p = 0.39) of preparatory parameters and soleus muscle activity (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.55), causing shorter (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.59) and lower (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.43) stepping, compared to young participants. Interestingly, young participants showed greater correlations between preparatory phase parameters and dynamic stability of the first step than older participants (average r of - 0.40 and - 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy.
PURPOSE: An age-related decline in anticipatory postural mechanisms has been reported during gait initiation; however, it is unclear whether such decline may jeopardize whole-body stability following unexpected balance perturbations. This study aimed to compare young and older individuals' ability to generate postural responses and preserve stability in response to external waist perturbations delivered within gait initiation. METHODS: Ten young and ten older participants performed 10 gait initiation trials followed by 48 unperturbed and 12 perturbed trials in a random order. A stereophotogrammetric system and three force platforms were used to quantify mechanical parameters from the preparatory phase (e.g., timing and amplitude of postural adjustments) and from the stepping phase (e.g., step characteristics and dynamic stability). Activation patterns of lower leg muscles were determined by surface electromyography. RESULTS: Older participants responded to perturbation with lower increase in both magnitude (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.62) and duration (p = 0.001; η2p = 0.39) of preparatory parameters and soleus muscle activity (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.55), causing shorter (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.59) and lower (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.43) stepping, compared to young participants. Interestingly, young participants showed greater correlations between preparatory phase parameters and dynamic stability of the first step than older participants (average r of - 0.40 and - 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that young participants took more time than older to adjust the anticipatory biomechanical response to perturbation attempting to preserve balance during stepping. In contrast, older adults were unable to modify their anticipatory adjustments in response to perturbation and mainly relied on compensatory mechanisms attempting to preserve stability via a more cautious stepping strategy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Elderly; Electromyography; Fall risk; Locomotion; Posture; Spatiotemporal analysis
Authors: A Maslivec; T M Bampouras; S Dewhurst; G Vannozzi; A Macaluso; L Laudani Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Christopher McCrum; Katrin Eysel-Gosepath; Gaspar Epro; Kenneth Meijer; Hans H C M Savelberg; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Kiros Karamanidis Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2014-12-11
Authors: Nicky van Melick; Bart M Meddeler; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Robert E H van Cingel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240