Merethe S Hansen1, Idlir Licaj2, Tonje Braaten2, Eiliv Lund2, Inger Torhild Gram2. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, The UiT Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. merethe.s.hansen@uit.no. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, The UiT Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between active and passive smoking and lung cancer risk and the population attributable fraction (PAF) of lung cancer due to active smoking, in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study, a nationally representative prospective cohort study. METHODS: We followed 142,508 women, aged 31-70 years, who completed a baseline questionnaire between 1991 and 2007, through linkages to national registries through December 2015. We used Cox proportional hazards models, to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We calculated PAF to indicate what proportion of lung cancer cases could have been prevented in the absence of smoking. RESULTS: During the more than 2.3 million person-years of observation, we ascertained 1507 lung cancer cases. Compared with never smokers, current (HR 13.88, 95% CI 10.18-18.91) smokers had significantly increased risk of lung cancer. Female never smokers exposed to passive smoking had a 1.3-fold (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.89-2.01) non- significantly increased risk of lung cancer, compared with never smokers. The PAF of lung cancer was 85.3% (95% CI 80.0-89.2). CONCLUSION: More than 8 in 10 lung cancer cases could have been avoided in Norway, if the women did not smoke.
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between active and passive smoking and lung cancer risk and the population attributable fraction (PAF) of lung cancer due to active smoking, in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study, a nationally representative prospective cohort study. METHODS: We followed 142,508 women, aged 31-70 years, who completed a baseline questionnaire between 1991 and 2007, through linkages to national registries through December 2015. We used Cox proportional hazards models, to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We calculated PAF to indicate what proportion of lung cancer cases could have been prevented in the absence of smoking. RESULTS: During the more than 2.3 million person-years of observation, we ascertained 1507 lung cancer cases. Compared with never smokers, current (HR 13.88, 95% CI 10.18-18.91) smokers had significantly increased risk of lung cancer. Female never smokers exposed to passive smoking had a 1.3-fold (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.89-2.01) non- significantly increased risk of lung cancer, compared with never smokers. The PAF of lung cancer was 85.3% (95% CI 80.0-89.2). CONCLUSION: More than 8 in 10 lung cancer cases could have been avoided in Norway, if the women did not smoke.
Authors: Sairah L F Chen; Tonje Braaten; Kristin B Borch; Pietro Ferrari; Torkjel M Sandanger; Therese H Nøst Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-16 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Ali Manouchehrinia; Jesse Huang; Jan Hillert; Lars Alfredsson; Tomas Olsson; Ingrid Kockum; Cris S Constantinescu Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Cao Maomao; Li He; Sun Dianqin; He Siyi; Yan Xinxin; Yang Fan; Zhang Shaoli; Xia Changfa; Lei Lin; Peng Ji; Chen Wanqing Journal: Cancer Biol Med Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 5.347
Authors: Xiaochen Dai; Gabriela F Gil; Marissa B Reitsma; Noah S Ahmad; Jason A Anderson; Catherine Bisignano; Sinclair Carr; Rachel Feldman; Simon I Hay; Jiawei He; Vincent Iannucci; Hilary R Lawlor; Matthew J Malloy; Laurie B Marczak; Susan A McLaughlin; Larissa Morikawa; Erin C Mullany; Sneha I Nicholson; Erin M O'Connell; Chukwuma Okereke; Reed J D Sorensen; Joanna Whisnant; Aleksandr Y Aravkin; Peng Zheng; Christopher J L Murray; Emmanuela Gakidou Journal: Nat Med Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 87.241