| Literature DB >> 33106394 |
Sungbong Kim1,2,3, Boram Lee4, Jonathan T Reeder1,5, Seon Hee Seo6, Sung-Uk Lee7, Aurélie Hourlier-Fargette1,5,8, Joonchul Shin9, Yurina Sekine10, Hyoyoung Jeong1,5, Yong Suk Oh1,11, Alexander J Aranyosi1,12, Stephen P Lee1,12, Jeffrey B Model1,12, Geumbee Lee1,5, Min-Ho Seo1,5, Sung Soo Kwak1,5, Seongbin Jo3,13, Gyungmin Park3,13, Sunghyun Han3,13, Inkyu Park11, Hyo-Il Jung14, Roozbeh Ghaffari15,12,16, Jahyun Koo17, Paul V Braun18,3, John A Rogers15,12,19,20,21,22,23,24.
Abstract
Soft microfluidic systems that capture, store, and perform biomarker analysis of microliter volumes of sweat, in situ, as it emerges from the surface of the skin, represent an emerging class of wearable technology with powerful capabilities that complement those of traditional biophysical sensing devices. Recent work establishes applications in the real-time characterization of sweat dynamics and sweat chemistry in the context of sports performance and healthcare diagnostics. This paper presents a collection of advances in biochemical sensors and microfluidic designs that support multimodal operation in the monitoring of physiological signatures directly correlated to physical and mental stresses. These wireless, battery-free, skin-interfaced devices combine lateral flow immunoassays for cortisol, fluorometric assays for glucose and ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and digital tracking of skin galvanic responses. Systematic benchtop evaluations and field studies on human subjects highlight the key features of this platform for the continuous, noninvasive monitoring of biochemical and biophysical correlates of the stress state.Entities:
Keywords: epidermal devices; galvanic skin response; healthcare; soft materials; sweat cortisol
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33106394 PMCID: PMC7668081 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012700117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Schematic illustrations and optical images of a skeletal microfluidic device with integrated immunoassays for cortisol, fluorescence assays for glucose and ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and electrical interfaces for sweat loss, sweat rate, and GSR. (A) Exploded schematic illustration of the structure of the device. (B) Magnified view of the main serpentine skeletal channel for tracking sweat loss, sweat rate, and an immunoassay for cortisol. (C) Cross-sectional view of the main channel, highlighting channel dimensions and integrated electrodes. (D) Microfluidic structures for fluorescence assays of glucose and ascorbic acid and an optical image of the system (Inset). (E) Optical image of an assembled device (Top), undergoing mechanical twisting (Middle) and bending (Bottom). (F) Three-dimensional modeling of the mechanics associated with similar configurations: flat (undeformed; Top), twisted (Middle), and bent (Bottom) to show the corresponding distributions of strain.
Fig. 2.Immunoassay-based lateral flow design and measurements for sweat cortisol. (A) ζ-Potential values measured after conjugation of ACA (0, 0.02, 0.2, 2, and 20 mg/mL; three data points for each ACA concentration; n = 15) on 30-nm AuNPs. (B) Effects of ACA (0.5 mg/mL) conjugation time on absorbance. (C) Comparison of absorbance at a wavelength of ∼280 nm before and after ACA conjugation. (D) Color development of ACA–AuNP at various concentrations of cortisol–BSA on the NC membrane. (E) Optical image of the LFIA strip after assembly and laser cutting. (F) Color development trends at various cortisol concentrations (5, 10, 30, 60, and 100 ng/mL) as a function of time. (G) Calibration of color index from the device at various concentrations of cortisol (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 ng/mL) and comparisons to benchtop ELISA tests at concentrations of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 ng/mL.
Fig. 3.Fluorescence assay design and measurements for sweat glucose and ascorbic acid. (A) Excitation and emission curves of OxiRed, the fluorescence probe. (B) Optical image of the apparatus used for fluorescence readout. (C) Image of ascorbic and glucose signals along with the reference (TMRE) signal. (D) Effect of the silicone packaging on the fluorescent signal for various ratios at black and white pigments at 0:10, 1:9, 3:7, and 10:0 (0, 10, 30, and 100%, respectively), along with corresponding images (Top). (E) Plot of the normalized fluorescence intensity for various glucose concentrations at 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 µM and their fluorescence intensities from associated images (Top). (F) Plotting of normalized fluorescence intensity for various ascorbic acid concentrations at 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM concentrations and their fluorescence intensities from associated images (Top).
Fig. 4.Design of NFC electronics for monitoring sweat loss, sweat rate, and GSR. (A) Schematic block diagram of the NFC electronic system and its interface to a sweat microfluidic device and a smartphone. (B) Optical image of the electronics to show chip placement. (C) Schematic block diagram of the electronics to show the reference resistor layouts for the main, reference, and GSR readout. (D) Magnified optical images of the electrode terminals for GSR (Left) and tracking reference electrodes that couple with the microfluidic device (Right). (E) Plot of electrolyte concentration for a series of samples of human sweat in the reference microchannel and corresponding ADC2 values determined by wireless readout. (F) Effect of body temperature at the initial phase of exercise on ∆GSR. (G) Correlation between sweat rate and ∆GSR after skin temperature stabilizes and sweating begins (forearm, 18 to 20 °C temperature, and 15 to 30% humidity).
Fig. 5.On-body measurements of sweat biomarkers during exercise. (A–D) Cortisol LFIA results for subjects 1 and 4 at 0 and 14 d. “Control” (C and D) indicates measurements of sweat cortisol under normal conditions of the subjects not being stressed. (E and F) Results of ascorbic acid and glucose at 0 and 14 d for subjects 3 and 4. (G and H) Sweat rate measurements for subjects 1 and 2 at 0 and 14 d. (I and J) ∆GSR measurements during high-intensity exercise and sweating for subjects 3 and 4. (K) Plotting and regression of quantitative assays results from LFIA and ELISA. Dotted line is prediction line.