Literature DB >> 33106259

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Fosfomycin after Continuous Infusion Compared with Intermittent Infusion: a Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Valentin Al Jalali1, Peter Matzneller1, Beatrix Wulkersdorfer1, Scharon Chou1, Soma Bahmany2, Birgit C P Koch2, Markus Zeitlinger3.   

Abstract

Continuous infusion (CON) of fosfomycin has been proposed as potentially advantageous in certain clinical scenarios. However, no clinical data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fosfomycin after CON are available to date. This study aimed to investigate the PK of fosfomycin after CON and compare it with intermittent infusion (INT) of fosfomycin. A randomized two-way crossover study including 8 healthy male volunteers was performed. Each subject received fosfomycin as INT of 8 g over 30 min every 8 h and, separated by a washout period, as CON of 1 g/h preceded by a loading dose of 8 g over 30 min. PK sampling was performed for 18 and 24 h in the CON and INT groups, respectively. Fosfomycin was generally well tolerated. However, 2 out of 8 subjects (25%) developed thrombophlebitis at the infusion site following CON, which was prevented in the following subjects with a simultaneous coinfusion of Ringer's lactate. The steady-state maximum concentration of drug in serum (C max) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUCSS,0-24) of fosfomycin after INT were 551.5 ± 67.8 mg/liter and 3,678.5 ± 601.9 h · mg/liter, respectively. CON led to an average steady-state concentration of 183.8 ± 35.9 mg/liter, resulting in a calculated AUCSS,0-24 of 4,411.2 ± 862.4 h · mg/liter, which was 1.2-fold higher than that with INT. CON resulted in a 100% T >MIC (time during which the drug concentration exceeds the MIC) for MICs of ≤128 mg/liter, whereas the %T >MIC for INT was only 44% for an MIC of 128 mg/liter. CON of fosfomycin led to improved PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants in plasma of healthy volunteers. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated in patients.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PK/PD; clinical trials; continuous infusion; fosfomycin; pharmacokinetics

Year:  2020        PMID: 33106259      PMCID: PMC7927804          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01375-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Enterobacteriaceae isolates to fosfomycin.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Sofia Maraki; Drosos E Karageorgopoulos; Antonia C Kastoris; Emmanuel Mavromanolakis; George Samonis
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  In vitro activity of fosfomycin against blaKPC-containing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, including those nonsusceptible to tigecycline and/or colistin.

Authors:  Andrea Endimiani; Gopi Patel; Kristine M Hujer; Mahesh Swaminathan; Federico Perez; Louis B Rice; Michael R Jacobs; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Exploration of the Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships for Fosfomycin Efficacy Using an In Vitro Infection Model.

Authors:  Brian D VanScoy; Jennifer McCauley; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Sujata M Bhavnani; Alan Forrest; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In Vitro Activity of Fosfomycin in Double and Triple Combinations with Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin and Tobramycin Against Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Wael Mohamed Abu El-Wafa; Yasser Musa Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  High interindividual variability in urinary fosfomycin concentrations in healthy female volunteers.

Authors:  R A Wijma; B C P Koch; T van Gelder; J W Mouton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  High activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model.

Authors:  Raluca Mihailescu; Ulrika Furustrand Tafin; Stéphane Corvec; Alessandra Oliva; Bertrand Betrisey; Oliver Borens; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against Staphylococcus aureus studied in an in vitro model of infection.

Authors:  Alan Noel; Marie Attwood; Karen Bowker; Alasdair MacGowan
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 8.  Deciphering pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin.

Authors:  A Rodríguez-Gascón; A Canut-Blasco
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Pharmacodynamics Of Linezolid-Plus-Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Susceptible And -Resistant Enterococci In Vitro And In Vivo Of A Galleria mellonella Larval Infection Model.

Authors:  Caifen Qi; Shuangli Xu; Maomao Wu; Shuo Zhu; Yanyan Liu; Hong Huang; Guijun Zhang; Jiabin Li; Xiaohui Huang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  The incidence and risk of infusion phlebitis with peripheral intravenous catheters: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luyu Lv; Jiaqian Zhang
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.283

View more
  2 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulation for dosage optimization of fosfomycin in the treatment of osteoarticular infections in patients without renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Matteo Rinaldi; Pier Giorgio Cojutti; Eleonora Zamparini; Sara Tedeschi; Nicolò Rossi; Matteo Conti; Maddalena Giannella; Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Dose Reduction in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Myth or Real Need? A Practical Approach for Guiding Dose Optimization of Novel Antibiotics.

Authors:  Milo Gatti; Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.