| Literature DB >> 33105912 |
Hyunsung Kim1, Jaehee Kim1, Young-Seok Kim2,3, Mijung Kim3, Youngjoo Lee1.
Abstract
This paper presents an energy-optimized electronic performance tracking system (EPTS) device for analyzing the athletic movements of football players. We first develop a tiny battery-operated wearable device that can be attached to the backside of field players. In order to analyze the strategic performance, the proposed wearable EPTS device utilizes the GNSS-based positioning solution, the IMU-based movement sensing system, and the real-time data acquisition protocol. As the life-time of the EPTS device is in general limited due to the energy-hungry GNSS sensing operations, for the energy-efficient solution extending the operating time, in this work, we newly develop the advanced optimization methods that can reduce the number of GNSS accesses without degrading the data quality. The proposed method basically identifies football activities during the match time, and the sampling rate of the GNSS module is dynamically relaxed when the player performs static movements. A novel deep convolution neural network (DCNN) is newly developed to provide the accurate classification of human activities, and various compression techniques are applied to reduce the model size of the DCNN algorithm, allowing the on-device DCNN processing even at the memory-limited EPTS device. Experimental results show that the proposed DCNN-assisted sensing control can reduce the active power by 28%, consequently extending the life-time of the EPTS device more than 1.3 times.Entities:
Keywords: electronic performance and tracking system; energy-efficient sensor control; on-device DCNN processing; sports wearable device
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33105912 PMCID: PMC7660228 DOI: 10.3390/s20216004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1A wearable electrical performance tracking system (EPTS) in football matches.
Figure 2A block diagram of the proposed wearable EPTS device.
Figure 3A circuit board of the proposed wearable EPTS device: (a) front-side and (b) back-side.
Figure 4(a) Standardized testing scenario. (b) The measured trajectory using the proposed device.
Power consumption of each component for performing the baseline operation.
| GNSS | IMU | MCU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current | 58.0 mA | 22.0 mA | 25.0 mA |
| Power | 191.4 mW | 72.6 mW | 82.5 mW |
| Proportion | 55.2% | 21.0% | 23.8% |
Figure 5(a) A trajectory recovered by the baseline sampling associated with the fully-activated GNSS module and (b) a trajectory recovered by the activity-aware sampling with the reduced number of GNSS accesses.
Football activity types in this work.
| Classification | Definition | Speed Range | GNSS Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stationary | Staying in one spot | <0.27 | 1 Hz |
| Walking | Moving forward by stepping | 0.27–1.67 | 2 Hz |
| Jogging | Moving forward at a slow, monotonous pace | 1.67–3.32 | 4 Hz |
| Running | Moving forward at a high intensity | >3.32 | 10 Hz |
| Turning_slow | Arc or semicircular motion at a slow pace | – | – |
| Turning_fast | Arc or semicircular motion at a fast pace | – | – |
Summary of the previous DCNN-based human activity classifiers.
| Method | Dataset | Accuracy | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeng et al. [ | [ | 96.88% | 173.56 KB |
| Chen and Xue [ | [ | 93.80% | 100.17 KB |
| Ha et al. [ | [ | 97.92% | 211.40 KB |
| Jiang and Yin [ | [ | 97.01% | 8.27 KB |
Figure 6Circuit diagrams for collecting samples of (a) linear movements and (b) turning movements.
Summary of acquired samples for training the proposed DCNN.
| Dataset | Stationary | Walking | Jogging | Running | Turning_slow | Turning_fast |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | 5028 | 5288 | 4988 | 3716 | 3548 | 3744 |
| Testing set | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
Figure 7Processing sequence of the proposed DCNN-based sensor control strategy.
Implementation results of DCNN operations at the prototype EPTS device.
| Model | Accuracy | Latency | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiang and Yin [ | 98.13% | 115 ms | 8.27 KB |
| Jiang and Yin [ | 89.42% | 55 ms | 2.60 KB |
| Proposed, 32b floating-point | 98.29% | 59 ms | 7.56 KB |
| Proposed, 8b fixed-point | 98.12% | 48 ms | 1.96 KB |
Near-optimal sensing-rate configurations from Algorithm 1.
| Classification |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Stationary | 1 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Walking | 1 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Jogging | 2 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Running | 2 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Turning_slow | 2 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Turning_fast | 4 Hz | 10 Hz |
Figure 8The recovered trajectories derived from (a) the straight-forward method and (b) the proposed DCNN-based scheme.
Figure 9Measurement errors for different football activities in terms of (a) distance and (b) speed ().
Figure 10Evaluating the objective function using Algorithm 1 to find the near-optimal sensing-rate configuration of the turning_slow activity.
Performance of different firmware solutions.
| Scheme | Power Consumption | Measurement Error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNSS | IMU | MCU | Total | |||
| Baseline | 191.4 mW | 72.6 mW | 82.5 mW | 346.5 mW | 0.076 | 0.679 |
| Straight-forward | 137.5 mW | 72.6 mW | 82.5 mW | 292.6 mW | 0.073 | 0.669 |
| Proposed | 117.8 mW | 48.2 mW | 82.5 mW | 248.4 mW | 0.071 | 0.657 |