| Literature DB >> 33105878 |
Chang Mo Jung1, Tae-Won Moon2, Won-Moo Hur3.
Abstract
The present study examines the effect of the emotional exhaustion associated with salespersons' job insecurity on their sleep (i.e., insomnia symptoms). We identified two types of formal organizational control systems (i.e., outcome-based and behavior-based controls) as boundary conditions that strengthen/weaken the positive relationship between job insecurity and emotional exhaustion. To test this moderating effect, we collected online panel surveys from 187 Korean salespersons at two time points, which were separated by three months. Like our predictions, the positive relationship between job insecurity and negative sleep quality (i.e., insomnia symptoms) was found to be mediated by emotional exhaustion. We further found a significant three-way interaction between job insecurity, outcome-based control, and behavior-based control, which is mediated by emotional exhaustion, indicating that the positive relationship between job insecurity and emotional exhaustion was strongest when the outcome-based control and behavior-based control of salespersons were high and low, respectively. The indirect effect of the emotional exhaustion associated with job insecurity on sleep quality was also weakest when the outcome-based control and behavior-based control were both high. These results provide theoretical and practical implications for managing employees in job insecurity contexts.Entities:
Keywords: behavior-based control; emotional exhaustion; formal organizational control system; job insecurity; outcome-based control; sleep
Year: 2020 PMID: 33105878 PMCID: PMC7712361 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1Moderated mediation model. Notes: † p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Coefficient: unstandardized coefficient. For parsimony, the control variables (i.e., gender, age, education, job tenure, job status, social desirability bias, and PANAS) are not included in this figure.
The measurement scales results of confirmatory factor analysis.
| Construct | Measurement Items | λ |
|---|---|---|
| Job Insecurity | I am sure that I will be able to keep my job. ® | 0.85 |
| There is a risk that I will lose my present job in the near future. | 0.83 | |
| I feel uncertain about the future of my job. | 0.73 | |
| I think that I will lose my job in the near future. | 0.90 | |
| Emotional Exhaustion | I feel emotionally drained from my work. | 0.83 |
| I feel fatigued when I get up in the morning and have to face another day on the job. | 0.75 | |
| I feel burned out from my work. | 0.76 | |
| Insomnia Symptoms | I had trouble falling asleep. | 0.82 |
| I had trouble staying asleep (including waking up too early). | 0.82 | |
| I woke up several times during the night. | 0.92 | |
| I woke up after my usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. | 0.61 | |
| Outcome-based Control | My supervisor establishes specific performance goals for my job. | 0.75 |
| My supervisor monitors the extent to which I attain my performance goals. | 0.84 | |
| If my performance goals were not met, I would be required to explain why. | 0.66 | |
| Behavior-based Control | My supervisor evaluates whether I provide a courteous service to customers. | 0.86 |
| My supervisor evaluates my ability to deal innovatively with unique situations and/or discover customer needs. | 0.93 | |
| My commitment to customers is evaluated by my supervisor. | 0.83 | |
| Positive Affectivity | Active | 0.74 |
| Attentive | 0.89 | |
| Alert | 0.69 | |
| Negative Affectivity | Nervous | 0.79 |
| Scared | 0.88 | |
| Ashamed | 0.55 | |
| Social Desirability Bias | I am always courteous, even to people who are disagreeable. | 0.63 |
| There have been occasions when I took advantage of someone. | 0.50 | |
| I sometimes try to get even, rather than forgive and forget. | 0.62 | |
| I sometimes feel resentful when I don’t get my way. | 0.69 | |
| No matter whom I’m talking to, I’m always a good listener. | 0.69 | |
| χ2(322) = 508.96; | ||
Note: ® = reversed scale.
Means, standard deviations, and correlations.
| M | SD | α | CR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gender | 0.41 | 0.49 | − | − | − | ||||||||||||
| 2. Age | 37.96 | 8.90 | − | − | 0.07 | − | |||||||||||
| 3. Education (year) | 14.34 | 1.87 | − | − | 0.16 * | 0.04 | − | ||||||||||
| 4. Job Tenure | 5.16 | 4.65 | − | − | 0.05 | 0.42 ** | 0.05 | − | |||||||||
| 5. Job Status | 0.65 | 0.48 | − | − | −0.13 † | −0.17 * | 0.05 | −0.06 | − | ||||||||
| 6. Social Desirability Bias | 3.56 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.09 | −0.11 | 0.05 | 0.40 | |||||||
| 7. Positive Affectivity | 2.51 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.18 * | 0.02 | 0.08 | −0.12 | 0.08 | 0.20 ** | 0.61 | ||||||
| 8. Negative Affectivity | 2.90 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.79 | −0.16 * | −0.33 ** | −0.05 | −0.08 | 0.02 | −0.05 | −0.15 * | 0.57 | |||||
| 9. Job Insecurity | 2.80 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.02 | −0.00 | −0.10 | 0.06 | −0.11 | −0.04 | −0.17 * | 0.18 * | 0.69 | ||||
| 10. Emotional Exhaustion | 3.28 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.82 | −0.21 ** | −0.31 ** | −0.21 ** | −0.06 | 0.06 | −0.08 | −0.33 ** | 0.56 ** | 0.26 ** | 0.61 | |||
| 11. Insomnia Symptoms | 2.93 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.88 | −0.17 * | 0.02 | −0.16 * | 0.03 | −0.08 | −0.24 ** | −0.13 † | 0.20 ** | 0.18 * | 0.38 ** | 0.64 | ||
| 12. Outcome-Based Control | 2.91 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.03 | −0.05 | 0.20 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.02 | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.01 | 0.57 | |
| 13. Behavior-Based Control | 3.01 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.10 | −0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.18 * | 0.23 ** | 0.07 | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.03 | 0.55 ** | 0.76 |
Note: † p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Numbers along the diagonal are the average variances extracted (AVEs). CR = composite reliability. Gender: 0 = female, 1 = male. Employment status: 0 = contract, 1 = permanent.
Test of the mediation effect of emotional exhaustion.
| Path | Effect | 95% CIlow | 95% CIhigh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Effect | |||
| Job Insecurity → Insomnia Symptoms | 0.128 | −0.019 | 0.273 |
| Direct Effect | |||
| Job Insecurity → Insomnia Symptoms | 0.076 | −0.054 | 0.210 |
| Indirect Effect | |||
| Job Insecurity → Emotional Exhaustion → Insomnia Symptoms | 0.052 | 0.005 | 0.115 |
Note: the coefficient is unstandardized.
Test of the moderating effects of outcome-based and behavior-based controls.
| Variables | Emotional Exhaustion | Insomnia Symptoms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b(se) | b(se) | |||
| Gender | −0.09 | (0.09) | −0.22 | (0.13) † |
| Age | −0.02 | (0.01) * | 0.01 | (0.01) † |
| Education | −0.06 | (0.02) ** | −0.02 | (0.03) |
| Job Tenure | 0.00 | (0.01) | −0.01 | (0.01) |
| Job Status | 0.16 | (0.09) † | −0.17 | (0.13) |
| Social Desirability Bias | 0.06 | (0.09) | −0.34 | (0.11) ** |
| Positive Affectivity | −0.26 | (0.06) ** | 0.09 | (0.08) |
| Negative Affectivity | 0.36 | (0.05) ** | −0.01 | (0.08) |
| Job Insecurity | 0.20 | (0.06) ** | 0.08 | (0.07) |
| Outcome-Based Control (OC) | 0.11 | (0.06) † | ||
| Behavior-Based Control (BC) | 0.01 | (0.06) | ||
| Job Insecurity × OC | 0.04 | (0.06) | ||
| Job Insecurity × BC | 0.01 | (0.06) | ||
| OC × BC | −0.12 | (0.05) ** | ||
| Job Insecurity × OC × BC | −0.08 | (0.04) * | ||
| Emotional Exhaustion | 0.45 | (0.10) ** | ||
|
| 49.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Moderated Mediation Index | ||||
| Job Insecurity × OC × BC → Emotional Exhaustion → Insomnia Symptoms: | ||||
Note: † p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. The coefficient is unstandardized.
Figure 2Interaction effect of outcome-based control and behavior-based control on the relationship between job insecurity and emotional exhaustion. Note: * p < 0.05. b = unstandardized coefficient.
Test of the conditional indirect effect of job insecurity on insomnia symptoms through emotional exhaustion with different levels of outcome-based control and behavior-based control.
| Moderating Variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome-Based Control | Behavior-Based Control |
| Cl95%low | Cl95%high |
| Low Level | Low Level | 0.038 | −0.028 | 0.133 |
| Low Level | High Level | 0.113 | 0.013 | 0.256 |
| High Level | Low Level | 0.136 | 0.018 | 0.323 |
| High Level | High Level | 0.076 | 0.019 | 0.162 |
Note. CI = confidence interval; b = unstandardized coefficient. High = M + 1 SD, Low = M−1 SD.