| Literature DB >> 33105841 |
Megan E Rosa-Caldwell1, Conner A Benson2, David E Lee1, Jacob L Brown1, Tyrone A Washington3, Nicholas P Greene1, Michael P Wiggs2,4.
Abstract
It is established that cancer cachexia causes limb muscle atrophy and is strongly associated with morbidity and mortality; less is known about how the development of cachexia impacts the diaphragm. The purpose of this study was to investigate cellular signaling mechanisms related to mitochondrial function, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and protein synthesis during the development of cancer cachexia. C57BL/J6 mice developed Lewis Lung Carcinoma for either 0 weeks (Control), 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, or 4 weeks. At designated time points, diaphragms were harvested and analyzed. Mitochondrial respiratory control ratio was ~50% lower in experimental groups, which was significant by 2 weeks of cancer development, with no difference in mitochondrial content markers COXIV or VDAC. Compared to the controls, ROS was 4-fold elevated in 2-week animals but then was not different at later time points. Only one antioxidant protein, GPX3, was altered by cancer development (~70% lower in experimental groups). Protein synthesis, measured by a fractional synthesis rate, appeared to become progressively lower with the cancer duration, but the mean difference was not significant. The development and progression of cancer cachexia induces marked alterations to mitochondrial function and ROS production in the diaphragm and may contribute to increased cachexia-associated morbidity and mortality.Entities:
Keywords: FOXO; mTOR; mitochondrial function; muscle atrophy; oxidative stress; protein degradation; protein synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33105841 PMCID: PMC7660065 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21217841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Mitochondrial function as related to respiratory control ratio (RCR) and markers of mitochondrial content and biogenesis. (A) Mitochondrial state 3: state 4 respiration, also known as respiratory control ratio (RCR). (B) COXIV (Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV) protein content. (C) VDAC (Voltage-dependent anion channel) protein content. (D) Representative images for immunoblotting from the current study. (E) PGC1α protein content. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Different letters represent statistical differences at a Tukey adjusted p < 0.05. n = 8–10/group.
Figure 2Reactive oxygen species generation and immunoblot data of antioxidant proteins (A) Hydrogen peroxide content (reactive oxygen species). (B) GPX3 protein content. (C) GPX7 protein content. (D) SOD1 protein content. (E) SOD2 protein content. (F) SOD3 protein content. (G) Representative images of immunoblotting data. (H) Catalase protein content. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Different letters represent statistical differences at a Tukey adjusted p < 0.05. n = 8–10/group.
Figure 3Markers of protein anabolism in the diaphragm. (A) Fractional synthesis rate (FSR) (B) Akt protein content (C) pAktSer473 protein content. (D) pAktSer473/Akt protein content. (E) 4EBP1 protein content (F) p4EBP1Thr37/46 protein content. (G) Representative images for immunoblot data (H) p4EBP1Thr37/46/4EBP1 protein content. (I) Deptor protein content. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 8–10/group.
Figure 4Immunoblot data for moderators of protein anabolism. (A) pFOXO1 protein data. (B) pFOXO3 protein content. (C) ERK protein content. (D) pERKThr202/Tyr204. (E) pERKThr202/Tyr204/ERK protein content. (F) Beclin protein content. (G) Representative images for immunoblot data. (H) p62 protein data. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Different letters represent statistical differences at a Tukey adjusted p < 0.05. n = 8–10/group.