Literature DB >> 33105507

Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Cristiano Spada1,2, Cesare Hassan3, Davide Bellini4, David Burling5, Giovanni Cappello6, Cristina Carretero7, Evelien Dekker8, Rami Eliakim9, Margriet de Haan10, Michal F Kaminski11, Anastasios Koulaouzidis12, Andrea Laghi13, Philippe Lefere14, Thomas Mang15, Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo1,2, Martina Morrin16, Deirdre McNamara17, Emanuele Neri18, Silvia Pecere2, Mathieu Pioche19, Andrew Plumb20, Emanuele Rondonotti21, Manon Cw Spaander22, Stuart Taylor20, Ignacio Fernandez-Urien23, Jeanin E van Hooft24, Jaap Stoker25, Daniele Regge6,26.   

Abstract

1: ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. 2: ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. The timing depends on an interdisciplinary decision including endoscopic and radiological factors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR suggests that, in centers with expertise in and availability of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), CCE preferably the same or the next day may be considered if colonoscopy is incomplete.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: When colonoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.Because of lack of direct evidence, ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CCE in this situation.Very low quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable alternative to colonoscopy for patients with non-alarm symptoms.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.In centers with availability, ESGE/ESGAR suggests that CCE may be considered in patients with non-alarm symptoms.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 4: Where there is no organized fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based population colorectal screening program, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an option for colorectal cancer screening, providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks, and depending on local service- and patient-related factors.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR do not suggest CCE as a first-line screening test for colorectal cancer.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC in the case of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or FIT with incomplete or unfeasible colonoscopy, within organized population screening programs.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE/ESGAR also suggest the use of CCE in this setting based on availability.Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 6: ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC with intravenous contrast medium injection for surveillance after curative-intent resection of colorectal cancer only in patients in whom colonoscopy is contraindicated or unfeasibleWeak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in this setting.Very low quality evidence. 7: ESGE/ESGAR suggest CTC in patients with high risk polyps undergoing surveillance after polypectomy only when colonoscopy is unfeasible.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.There is insufficient evidence to recommend CCE in post-polypectomy surveillance.Very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE/ESGAR recommend against CTC in patients with acute colonic inflammation and in those who have recently undergone colorectal surgery, pending a multidisciplinary evaluation.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm detected at CTC or CCE.Follow-up CTC may be clinically considered for 6 - 9-mm CTC-detected lesions if patients do not undergo polypectomy because of patient choice, comorbidity, and/or low risk profile for advanced neoplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33105507     DOI: 10.1055/a-1258-4819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  12 in total

1.  Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Michael M Davies; Muti Abulafi; Ayan Banerjea; Brian D Nicholson; Ramesh Arasaradnam; Neil Barker; Sally Benton; Richard Booth; David Burling; Rachel Victoria Carten; Nigel D'Souza; James Edward East; Jos Kleijnen; Michael Machesney; Maria Pettman; Jenny Pipe; Lance Saker; Linda Sharp; James Stephenson; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 31.793

Review 2.  How should we do colon capsule endoscopy reading: a practical guide.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Konstantinos Dabos; Michael Philipper; Ervin Toth; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 3.  A Review of Colorectal Cancer in Terms of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Development, Symptoms and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Sawicki; Monika Ruszkowska; Anna Danielewicz; Ewa Niedźwiedzka; Tomasz Arłukowicz; Katarzyna E Przybyłowicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient's perspective.

Authors:  Mohd Syafiq Ismail; Greg Murphy; S Semenov; D McNamara
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Applicability of colon capsule endoscopy as pan-endoscopy: From bowel preparation, transit, and rating times to completion rate and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Fanny E R Vuik; Sarah Moen; Stella A V Nieuwenburg; Eline H Schreuders; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Impairment of colorectal cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Serhiy Semenov; Mohd Syafiq Ismail; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-06

7.  Performance of a Deep Learning System for Automatic Diagnosis of Protruding Lesions in Colon Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Miguel Mascarenhas; João Afonso; Tiago Ribeiro; Hélder Cardoso; Patrícia Andrade; João P S Ferreira; Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva; Guilherme Macedo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-12

Review 8.  Scoring Systems for Clinical Colon Capsule Endoscopy-All You Need to Know.

Authors:  Trevor Tabone; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Pierre Ellul
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  State-of-the-Art Review on Immersive Virtual Reality Interventions for Colonoscopy-Induced Anxiety and Pain.

Authors:  Marcel-Alexandru Găină; Andreea Silvana Szalontay; Gabriela Ștefănescu; Gheorghe Gh Bălan; Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc; Alexandra Boloș; Alexandra-Maria Găină; Cristinel Ștefănescu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Colorectal Cancer Screening with Computed Tomography Colonography: Single Region Experience in Kazakhstan.

Authors:  Jandos Amankulov; Dilyara Kaidarova; Zhamilya Zholdybay; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Nurlan Baltabekov; Madina Gabdullina; Akmaral Ainakulova; Dias Toleshbayev; Alexandra Panina; Elvira Satbayeva; Zhansaya Kalieva
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.