Literature DB >> 33105412

Interocular Difference in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Predicts Optic Neuritis in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Amy T Waldman1, Leslie Benson, John R Sollee, Amy M Lavery, Geraldine W Liu, Ari J Green, Emmanuelle Waubant, Gena Heidary, Darrel Conger, Jennifer Graves, Benjamin Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is capable of quantifying retinal damage. Defining the extent of anterior visual pathway injury is important in multiple sclerosis (MS) as a way to document evidence of prior disease, including subclinical injury, and setting a baseline for patients early in the course of disease. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness is typically classified as low if values fall outside of a predefined range for a healthy population. In adults, an interocular difference (IOD) in RNFL thickness greater than 5 μm identified a history of unilateral optic neuritis (ON). Through our PERCEPTION (PEdiatric Research Collaboration ExPloring Tests in Ocular Neuroimmunology) study, we explored whether RNFL IOD informs on remote ON in a multicenter pediatric-onset MS (POMS) cohort.
METHODS: POMS (defined using consensus criteria and first attack <18 years) patients were recruited from 4 academic centers. A clinical history of ON (>6 months prior to an OCT scan) was confirmed by medical record review. RNFL thickness was measured on Spectralis machines (Heidelberg, Germany). Using a cohort of healthy controls from our centers tested on the same machines, RNFL thickness <86 μm (<2 SDs below the mean) was defined as abnormal. Based on previously published findings in adults, an RNFL IOD >5 μm was defined as abnormal. The proportions of POMS participants with RNFL thinning (<86 μm) and abnormal IOD (>5 μm) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to determine whether IOD was associated with remote ON.
RESULTS: A total of 157 participants with POMS (mean age 15.2 years, SD 3.2; 67 [43%] with remote ON) were enrolled. RNFL thinning occurred in 45 of 90 (50%) ON eyes and 24 of 224 (11%) non-ON eyes. An IOD >5 μm was associated with a history of remote ON (P < 0.001). An IOD >5 μm occurred in 62 participants, 40 (65%) with remote ON. Among 33 participants with remote ON but normal RNFL values (≥86 μm in both eyes), 14 (42%) were confirmed to have ON by IOD criteria (>5 μm).
CONCLUSIONS: In POMS, the diagnostic yield of OCT in confirming remote ON is enhanced by considering RNFL IOD, especially for those patients with RNFL thickness for each eye in the normal range. An IOD >5 μm in patients with previous visual symptoms suggests a history of remote ON.
Copyright © 2020 by North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33105412      PMCID: PMC8846428          DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol        ISSN: 1070-8022            Impact factor:   3.042


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Axel Petzold; Johannes F de Boer; Sven Schippling; Patrik Vermersch; Randy Kardon; Ari Green; Peter A Calabresi; Chris Polman
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  N McNicholas; M Hutchinson; C McGuigan; J Chataway
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Sex differences and subclinical retinal injury in pediatric-onset MS.

Authors:  Jennifer S Graves; Hardeep Chohan; Benjamin Cedars; Samuel Arnow; Hao Yiu; Emmanuelle Waubant; Ari Green
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Pediatric Optic Neuritis Prospective Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Grant T Liu; Amy T Waldman; Elizabeth Lazar; Mark J Kupersmith; Michael X Repka
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Applications of optical coherence tomography in pediatric clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Robert A Avery; Raneem D Rajjoub; Carmelina Trimboli-Heidler; Amy T Waldman
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 1.947

7.  Reduced retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume in pediatric multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ünsal Yilmaz; Kivilcim Gücüyener; Döndü Melek Erin; Zeliha Yazar; Esra Gürkaş; Ayşe Serdaroğlu; Nermin Tepe; Ercan Demir
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  The OSCAR-IB consensus criteria for retinal OCT quality assessment.

Authors:  Prejaas Tewarie; Lisanne Balk; Fiona Costello; Ari Green; Roland Martin; Sven Schippling; Axel Petzold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials in pediatric MS.

Authors:  Amy T Waldman; Grant T Liu; Amy M Lavery; Geraldine Liu; William Gaetz; Tomas S Aleman; Brenda L Banwell
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2017-06-05

10.  The APOSTEL recommendations for reporting quantitative optical coherence tomography studies.

Authors:  Andrés Cruz-Herranz; Lisanne J Balk; Timm Oberwahrenbrock; Shiv Saidha; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Wolf A Lagreze; Joel S Schuman; Pablo Villoslada; Peter Calabresi; Laura Balcer; Axel Petzold; Ari J Green; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt; Philipp Albrecht
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.