Literature DB >> 33105366

Show Me, Tell Me, Encourage Me: The Effect of Different Forms of Feedback on Resistance Training Performance.

Jonathon Weakley1,2, Kyle Wilson3, Kevin Till1,2,4, Harry Banyard5,6, James Dyson1, Padraic Phibbs1,2, Dale Read1,2, Ben Jones1,2,4,7.   

Abstract

Weakley, J, Wilson, K, Till, K, Banyard, H, Dyson, J, Phibbs, P, Read, D, and Jones, B. Show me, tell me, encourage me: The effect of different forms of feedback on resistance training performance. J Strength Cond Res 34(11): 3157-3163, 2020-When performing resistance training, verbal kinematic feedback and visual kinematic feedback are known to enhance performance. In addition, providing verbal encouragement can assist in the attenuation of fatigue. However, the effects of these forms of feedback have never been compared. Consequently, this study aimed to quantify the effects of verbal kinematic feedback and visual kinematic feedback, and verbal encouragement on barbell velocity during the back squat. Furthermore, changes in performance were related to individual-reported conscientiousness. Twelve semiprofessional rugby union players volunteered to participate in the study that consisted of the subjects completing a set of the barbell back squat across 4 conditions (i.e., no-feedback [control], verbal feedback of kinematic information [verbal], visual feedback of kinematic information [visual], and verbal encouragement [encouragement]). In addition, participants completed a questionnaire before the study to assess conscientiousness. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess differences between conditions, whereas Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to assess relationships between conscientiousness and changes in barbell velocity. All 3 forms of feedback showed almost certain improvements in barbell velocity, while differences between interventions were likely to very likely trivial. Changes in barbell velocity showed small to large inverse relationships with conscientiousness. These findings suggest that practitioners should supply kinematic feedback (verbally or visually) or, when technology is not available, provide athletes with encouraging statements while resistance training. Verbal encouragement may be of greatest benefit for individuals who demonstrate low levels of conscientiousness. Given these findings, practitioners are advised to use either technology or verbal encouragement to manipulate acute training outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33105366     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  The Reliability and Validity of Current Technologies for Measuring Barbell Velocity in the Free-Weight Back Squat and Power Clean.

Authors:  Steve W Thompson; David Rogerson; Harry F Dorrell; Alan Ruddock; Andrew Barnes
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  Validity of the iLOAD® app for resistance training monitoring.

Authors:  Evandro Claudino de Sá; André Ricarte Medeiros; André Santana Ferreira; Amador García Ramos; Danica Janicijevic; Daniel Boullosa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Velocity Loss Thresholds Reliably Control Kinetic and Kinematic Outputs during Free Weight Resistance Training.

Authors:  Madison Pearson; Amador García-Ramos; Matthew Morrison; Carlos Ramirez-Lopez; Nicholas Dalton-Barron; Jonathon Weakley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  The effects of technological and traditional feedback on back squat performance in untrained women.

Authors:  N Stien; V Andersen; G H Engelsrud; T E J Solstad; A H Saeterbakken
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Concurrent and Predictive Validity of an Exercise-Specific Scale for the Perception of Velocity in the Back Squat.

Authors:  Ruggero Romagnoli; Sergio Civitella; Carlo Minganti; Maria Francesca Piacentini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Movement velocity can be used to estimate the relative load during the bench press and leg press exercises in older women.

Authors:  Pablo Jorge Marcos-Pardo; Jorge Miguel González-Hernández; Amador García-Ramos; Abraham López-Vivancos; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.