Literature DB >> 33105261

Objective Assessment of Speech Intelligibility in Crowded Public Spaces.

Douglas S Brungart1, Mary E Barrett2, Julie I Cohen2, Calli Fodor2, Calli M Yancey2, Sandra Gordon-Salant2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to obtain a normative database of speech intelligibility data for young normal-hearing listeners communicating in public spaces. A total of 174 listeners participated in an interactive speech intelligibility task that required four-person groups to conduct a live version of the Modified Rhyme Test in noisy public spaces. The public spaces tested included a college library, a college cafeteria, a casual dining restaurant during lunch hour, and a crowded bar during happy hour. At the start of each trial, one of the participants was randomly selected as the talker, and a tablet computer was used to prompt them to say a word aloud from the Modified Rhyme Test. Then, the other three participants were required to select this word from one of six rhyming alternatives displayed on three other tablet computers. The tablet computers were also used to record the SPL at each listener location during and after the interval where the target talker was speaking. These SPL measurements were used to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in each trial of the experiment. As expected, the results show that speech intelligibility decreases, response time increases, and perceived difficulty increases as the background noise level increases. There was also a systematic decrease in SNR with increasing background noise, with SNR decreasing 0.44 dB for every 1 dB increase in ambient noise level above 60 dB. Overall, the results of this study have demonstrated how low-cost tablet computer-based data collection systems can be used to collect live-talker speech intelligibility data in real-world environments. We believe these techniques could be adapted for use in future studies focused on obtaining ecologically valid assessments of the effects of age, hearing impairment, amplification, and other factors on speech intelligibility performance in real-world environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33105261      PMCID: PMC7676620          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  20 in total

1.  ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET.

Authors:  A S HOUSE; C E WILLIAMS; M H HEKER; K D KRYTER
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Conversational speech levels and signal-to-noise ratios in realistic acoustic conditions.

Authors:  Adam Weisser; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech volume regulation in Parkinson's disease: effects of implicit cues and explicit instructions.

Authors:  A K Ho; J L Bradshaw; R Iansek; R Alfredson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jörg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Observations on hearing aid users' strategies for controlling the level of their own voice.

Authors:  Søren Laugesen; Claus Nielsen; Patrick Maas; Niels Søgaard Jensen
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Speech, movement, and gaze behaviours during dyadic conversation in noise.

Authors:  Lauren V Hadley; W Owen Brimijoin; William M Whitmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Movement and Gaze Behavior in Virtual Audiovisual Listening Environments Resembling Everyday Life.

Authors:  Maartje M E Hendrikse; Gerard Llorach; Volker Hohmann; Giso Grimm
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Three New Outcome Measures That Tap Into Cognitive Processes Required for Real-Life Communication.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Emina Alickovic; Carina Graversen; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Dorothea Wendt; Gitte Keidser
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Graham Naylor; Douglas S Brungart; Andreas Caduff; Jennifer Campos; Simon Carlile; Mark G Carpenter; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Inga Holube; Stefan Launer; Thomas Lunner; Ravish Mehra; Frances Rapport; Malcolm Slaney; Karolina Smeds
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rapid but specific perceptual learning partially explains individual differences in the recognition of challenging speech.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Hanin Karawani; Limor Lavie; Yizhar Lavner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Sebastian Waz; Emily Buss; Yi Shen; Virginia Richards; Hari Bharadwaj; G Christopher Stecker; Jordan A Beim; Adam K Bosen; Meredith D Braza; Anna C Diedesch; Claire M Dorey; Andrew R Dykstra; Frederick J Gallun; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Lincoln Gray; Eric C Hoover; Antje Ihlefeld; Thomas Koelewijn; Judy G Kopun; Juraj Mesik; Daniel E Shub; Jonathan H Venezia
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Graham Naylor; Douglas S Brungart; Andreas Caduff; Jennifer Campos; Simon Carlile; Mark G Carpenter; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann; Inga Holube; Stefan Launer; Thomas Lunner; Ravish Mehra; Frances Rapport; Malcolm Slaney; Karolina Smeds
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.