Literature DB >> 3310505

Measurement of acute response to draught in the eye.

N M Wyon1, D P Wyon.   

Abstract

In order to assess the sensitivity to draught of 7 different tests, 41 volunteer subjects were exposed experimentally: 18 to 1.0 m/s and 9 to 0.5 m/s in a climate chamber: 14 to an average of 0.67 m/s in an air-conditioned car. All exposures were at 21-22 degrees C. Exposures were for 30 min indoors, 45 min in the car. Break-up Time (BUT) of the pre-corneal film after a blink was observed before and after exposure in the laboratory. There was a significant decrease after exposure to 1.0 m/s (P less than 0.01) but not to 0.5 m/s. The variance of the observed BUT increased after exposure to 0.5 m/s (P less than 0.05). The Norn Lacrimal Dilution test showed increased tear flow after the climate-chamber exposures (P less than 0.05). Self-reported BUT(S) was always several times longer than BUT. There was a significant correlation between these measures (P less than 0.05) before exposure, but not after. BUT(S), like BUT, decreased after exposure to 1.0 m/s (P less than 0.01), but not after 0.05 m/s. However, the variance of BUT(S) did not increase significantly after 0.5 m/s; it decreased significantly after 1.0 m/s (P less than 0.01). A significantly improved mucus ferning pattern was observed after draught exposure (P less than 0.005), presumably due in part to increased lacrimal flow. There was no significant effect of draught on the albumin content of tear samples taken before and after exposure. Lissamine Green staining performed before and after exposure revealed no effect on micro-damage to the conjunctival epithelium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3310505     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb07011.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  9 in total

Review 1.  TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report.

Authors:  Mark D P Willcox; Pablo Argüeso; Georgi A Georgiev; Juha M Holopainen; Gordon W Laurie; Tom J Millar; Eric B Papas; Jannick P Rolland; Tannin A Schmidt; Ulrike Stahl; Tatiana Suarez; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Omür Ö Uçakhan; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Exposure study to examine chemosensory effects of formaldehyde on hyposensitive and hypersensitive males.

Authors:  Joerg U Mueller; Thomas Bruckner; Gerhard Triebig
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Experimental exposure to propylene glycol mist in aviation emergency training: acute ocular and respiratory effects.

Authors:  G Wieslander; D Norbäck; T Lindgren
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  A field study on clinical signs and symptoms in cleaners at floor polish removal and application in a Swedish hospital.

Authors:  Gunilla Wieslander; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Can air pollution affect tear film stability? A cross-sectional study in the aftermath of an explosion accident.

Authors:  Bente E Moen; D Norbäck; G Wieslander; J V Bakke; N Magerøy; J T Granslo; A Irgens; M Bråtveit; B E Hollund; T Aasen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Effect of airflow exposure on the tear meniscus.

Authors:  Shizuka Koh; Cynthia Tung; Ranjini Kottaiyan; James Zavislan; Geunyoung Yoon; James Aquavella
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Face Mask-Related Ocular Surface Modifications During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Clinical, In Vivo Confocal Microscopy, and Immune-Cytology Study.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Manuela Lanzini; Lorenza Brescia; Rossella D'Aloisio; Mario Nubile; Marco Ciancaglini; Claudio D'Amario; Luca Agnifili; Rodolfo Mastropasqua
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Ocular surface disturbance in patients after acute COVID-19.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Grace C Y Lui; Ken C F Poon; Susanna S S Ng; Alvin L Young; David S C Hui; Clement C Y Tham; Paul K S Chan; Chi Pui Pang; Kelvin K L Chong
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.383

9.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the ocular surface.

Authors:  Ana Marta; Joao Heitor Marques; Daniel Almeida; Diana José; Paulo Sousa; Irene Barbosa
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.534

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.