| Literature DB >> 33104968 |
Asher A Mendelson1,2, Ajay Rajaram1,3, Daniel Bainbridge4,5, Keith St Lawrence1,3, Tracey Bentall5, Michael Sharpe4,5, Mamadou Diop1,3, Christopher G Ellis6,7,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a need for bedside methods to monitor oxygen delivery in the microcirculation. Near-infrared spectroscopy commonly measures tissue oxygen saturation, but does not reflect the time-dependent variability of microvascular hemoglobin content (MHC) that attempts to match oxygen supply with demand. The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of MHC monitoring in critically ill patients using high-resolution near-infrared spectroscopy to assess perfusion in the peripheral microcirculation.Entities:
Keywords: Critical care; Hemodynamic monitor; Microcirculation; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Wavelet analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33104968 PMCID: PMC7586414 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00611-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Monit Comput ISSN: 1387-1307 Impact factor: 1.977
Fig. 1Application of continuous wavelet transform (CWT) to microvascular hemoglobin content (MHC) time series in peripheral tissue for continuous perfusion monitoring. 15 min of data is shown for two patients with cardiac arrest (upper) and sepsis (lower). MHC variability is defined as the change from baseline in total hemoglobin concentration, measured at high temporal resolution (10 Hz) with isosbestic near-infrared spectroscopy (ΔOD, arbitrary units). MHC time series demonstrates substantial temporal variability, as well as differences in variability patterns between patients. Data is represented with standard time series (MHC vs time), CWT time–frequency projection (power vs frequency vs time), and the global wavelet power spectrum (GWPS) averaged over the recording (power vs frequency). Dotted line in the CWT indicates data outside the cone of influence that is susceptible to edge effects. Dashed lines in the GWPS represent the boundaries of the frequency bands used for analysis in this study (B1 metabolic, B2 endothelial, B3 neurogenic, B4 myogenic, B5 respiratory, B6 cardiac)
Frequency bands used in the present study, that are attributable to physiological oscillations in the cardiovascular system [23, 24, 43]
| Frequency band | Frequency (Hz) | Period (seconds) | Cycles/minute |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0 | 0–0.005 | > 200 | < 0.3 |
| B1—Metabolic | 0.005–0.0095 | 105.3–200 | 0.3–0.57 |
| B2—Endothelial | 0.0095–0.02 | 50–105.3 | 0.57–1.2 |
| B3—Neurogenic | 0.02–0.06 | 16.67–50 | 1.2–3.6 |
| B4—Myogenic | 0.06–0.16 | 6.25–16.67 | 3.6–9.6 |
| B5—Respiratory | 0.16–0.667 | 1.5–6.25 | 9.6–40 |
| B6—Cardiac | 0.667–3.1 | 0.32–1.5 | 40–186 |
Frequency ranges are adapted from previous studies [21, 25], with modification to the upper limit of respiratory band to include rapid breathing rates observed in the ICU
Demographics for the patients in the final dataset included for analysis (n = 31). Data are represented as mean ± SD, median (IQR), or percentage of total cohort
| N = 31 patients | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62.10 ± 16.55 |
| Male (%) | 61.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 82.12 ± 17.67 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 75.30 ± 12.73 |
| HR (bpm) | 83.32 ± 15.68 |
| Sepsis (%) | 35.5 |
| Cardiac arrest (%) | 19.4 |
| Vasopressors (%) | 64.5 |
| Mechanical ventilation (%) | 90.3 |
| FiO2 | 0.40 (0.2) |
| SpO2% | 97 (3.5) |
| PEEP (cm H20) | 10 (4) |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 1.4 (0.8) |
| [Hb] (g/L) | 95 (34.5) |
MAP mean arterial pressure, HR heart rate, FiO fraction of inspired oxygen, SpO arterial oxygen saturation, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, [Hb] systemic hemoglobin concentration
Fig. 2MHC signal characteristics for the patients included in the final cohort (n = 31 patients), reported for total signal B2–B5 and for each frequency band (B2 endothelial, B3 neurogenic, B4 myogenic, B5 respiratory). a MHC median power values for patients in the cohort follows lognormal distribution (p > 0.05, D’Agostino Pearson test). b Temporal variation in each frequency band, expressed as coefficient of variation (%CV) of signal power vs time. c Percentage contribution (%Power) for each frequency band relative to total signal power B2–B5, calculated as (median Power band / median Power B2–B5)
Fig. 3Signal power composition for each patient (n = 31) demonstrates the percentage contribution (%Power) from each frequency band relative to overall signal power (B2 endothelial, B3 neurogenic, B4 myogenic, B5 respiratory). %Power composition is not consistent between patients in the cohort. a %Power for microvascular bands B2–B4 and respiratory band B5 relative to overall signal B2–B5; %Power is calculated as (median Power/median Power B2–B5). b %Power for each microvascular band relative to microvascular signal B2–B4; %Power is calculated as (median Power/median Power B2–B4)
Fig. 4High-resolution NIRS demonstrates the interaction between mechanical ventilation and MHC signal in peripheral tissue. MHC time series (ΔOD, arbitrary units) for three patients are shown. The mechanical ventilator is evident as a distinctive “saw-tooth” pattern superimposed on the intrinsic variability of the MHC signal. The frequency corresponds to the respiratory rate (RR, breaths per minute) delivered by the mechanical ventilator
Fig. 5MHC signal power is differentiated according to vasopressor status, but is not correlated with mean arterial pressure. Note the -logtransform data where lower values indicate higher MHC signal power. MAP mean arterial pressure. a MHC signal power B2–B5 is significantly reduced for patients receiving vasopressors (*p = 0.0286, Student’s unpaired t-test). Lines represent mean and standard deviation. b MHC signal power B2–B5 is not correlated with mean arterial pressure