Literature DB >> 33104939

Smart wearable devices as a psychological intervention for healthy lifestyle and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial.

Hsin-Yen Yen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Creating a healthy lifestyle is important across different life stages. Commercial smart wearable devices are an innovative and interesting approach as an early psychological intervention for modifying health-related behaviors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of smart wearable devices on health-promoting lifestyles and quality of life.
METHODS: The study design was a three-parallel randomized controlled trial with a 3-month intervention. Two commercial smart wearable devices (smartwatches and smart bracelets) with different levels of complicated functions were applied as a psychological intervention in comparison with a smartphone app as the control group. Participants were healthy young adults with a median age of 26 years. Outcome measurements were conducted by self-administered questionnaires. Chi-square tests and ANOVA were performed for testing the difference of participants at baseline, and generalized estimating equations were performed for testing the effect of the intervention.
RESULTS: At the beginning, 81 participants were recruited and 73 participants completed the study. Results of a healthy lifestyle demonstrated significant group effects of exercise and a significant effect of the interaction for self-actualization and stress management in the experimental group with a smartwatch (Self-actualization: MD = 0.35[- 0.10,0.80]; Exercise: MD = 0.21[- 0.33 0.75]; Stress management: MD = 0.36[- 0.04,0.76]) by comparing with only using mobile app (Self-actualization: MD =  - 0.03[- 0.25,0.18]; Exercise: MD =  - 0.12[- 0.38,0.14]; Stress management, MD =  - 0.28[- 0.55,0.00]). The significant effect of group-by-time interaction for self-actualization was found in the experimental group with a smart bracelet (MD = 0.05[- 0.30,0.20]) by comparing with the control group. The GEE-adjusted model indicated significant effects of the interaction on the comprehensive, physical, and mental quality of life in the experimental group with the smartwatch (Comprehensive: MD = 0.24[- 0.04,0.52]; Physical: MD = 0.67[0.26,1.09]; Mental: MD = 0.72[0.29,1.16]) by comparing with the control group (Comprehensive: MD =  - 1.57[- 2.55, - 0.59]; Physical: MD = 0.25[0.00,0.50]; Mental: MD = 0.08[- 0.11,0.27]).
CONCLUSION: From a psychological perspective, smart wearable devices have potential benefits of shaping a healthy lifestyle and improving the quality of life. Enhancing the utility of commercial well-designed smart wearable devices is an innovative and effective strategy for promoting public health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health behavior; Mobile health; Physical activity; Sedentary behavior; Stress management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33104939     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02680-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

Review 1.  Noncommunicable diseases.

Authors:  David J Hunter; K Srinath Reddy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  S N Walker; K R Sechrist; N J Pender
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 3.  Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Jena S Tronieri; Meghan L Butryn
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020 Feb-Mar

4.  Randomized Trial of a Fitbit-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Women.

Authors:  Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram; Bess H Marcus; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara A Parker; Brittany L Morey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Wearable Devices and Smartphones for Activity Tracking Among People with Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Ment Health Phys Act       Date:  2016-03

6.  Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  John M Jakicic; Kelliann K Davis; Renee J Rogers; Wendy C King; Marsha D Marcus; Diane Helsel; Amy D Rickman; Abdus S Wahed; Steven H Belle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Michelle Nicole Burns; Stephen M Schueller; Gregory Clarke; Michael Klinkman
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Trials of Intervention Principles: Evaluation Methods for Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Stephen M Schueller; William T Riley; C Hendricks Brown; Pim Cuijpers; Naihua Duan; Mary J Kwasny; Colleen Stiles-Shields; Ken Cheung
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  The behavioral intervention technology model: an integrated conceptual and technological framework for eHealth and mHealth interventions.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Stephen M Schueller; Enid Montague; Michelle Nicole Burns; Parisa Rashidi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Can a Free Wearable Activity Tracker Change Behavior? The Impact of Trackers on Adults in a Physician-Led Wellness Group.

Authors:  Lisa Gualtieri; Sandra Rosenbluth; Jeffrey Phillips
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-11-30
View more
  2 in total

1.  Mobile-Health based physical activities co-production policies towards cardiovascular diseases prevention: findings from a mixed-method systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriele Palozzi; Gianluca Antonucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Telemedicine Technologies Selection for the Posthospital Patient Care Process after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karolina Kamecka; Calogero Foti; Łukasz Gawiński; Marek Matejun; Anna Rybarczyk-Szwajkowska; Marek Kiljański; Marek Krochmalski; Remigiusz Kozłowski; Michał Marczak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.