| Literature DB >> 33104734 |
Mohammed Abdus Salam1,2, Shujit Chandra Paul3, Rabiatul Adawiyah M Mohamad Zain2, Snahasish Bhowmik3, Mithun Rani Nath3, Sadia Afrin Siddiqua4, Tutun Das Aka5, Muhammad Anwar Iqbal1, Wan Rashidah Kadir6, Rozita Binti Ahamad6, Md Abdul Khaleque7, Aweng Eh Rak2, Mohamad Faiz Mohd Amin2.
Abstract
The rapid growth of industrial and agricultural activities in Malaysia are leading to the impairment of most of the rivers in recent years through realising various trace metals. This leads to toxicity, particularly when the toxic has entered the food chain. Perak River is one of the most dynamic rivers for the Malaysian population. Therefore, in consideration of the safety issue, this study was conducted to assess the concentration of such metals (Cd, Cu, Zn, Fe, and Pb) in the muscles of most widely consumed fish species (Barbonymus schwanenfeldii, Puntius bulum, Puntius daruphani, Hexanematichthys sagor, Channa striatus, Mystacoleucus marginatus, and Devario regina) from different locations of Perak River, Malaysia by employing inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Among the trace metals, Fe and Cd were found to be the highest (29.33-148.01 μg/g) and lowest (0.16-0.49 μg/g) concentration in all of the studied species, respectively. Although the estimated daily intakes (μg/kg/day) of Cd (0.65-0.85), Fe (79.27-352.00) and Pb (0.95-12.17) were higher than their reference, the total target hazard quotients values suggested that the local residents would not experience any adverse health effects from its consumption. In contrast, the target cancer risk value suggested that all fish species posed a potential cancer risk due to Cd and cumulative cancer risk values, strongly implying that continuous consumption of studied fish species would cause cancer development to its consumers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33104734 PMCID: PMC7588088 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The map of Perak River.
The samples were collected along the river according to the availability of the fish from the upstream to downstream (Source: USGS National Map Viewer [28]).
List of fish species with length, weight, and Fulton's condition factor (K) along with ecological characteristics.
| Local Name | Common Name | Scientific Name | Sample size (n) | Mean Weight (g) (mean ± SD) | Mean length (cm) (mean ± SD) | K (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tengalan | Crossbanded barb | 9 | 430 ± 20 | 35 ± 5 | 1.07 ± 0.41 | |
| Kerai | Lemon fin barb | 9 | 230 ± 30 | 27 ± 4.4 | 1.24 ± 0.45 | |
| Sia | Barb, spiny | 9 | 45 ± 7.5 | 16 ± 4 | 1.31 ± 0.79 | |
| Lampam sungai | Tinfoil barb | 15 | 110 ± 13.5 | 21 ± 5 | 1.41 ± 0.85 | |
| Seluang pipih | Fowler's danio | 9 | 6 ± 2.5 | 12 ± 2.5 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | |
| Duri | Sagor catfish | 9 | 55 ± 10 | 18 ± 3 | 1 ± 0.32 | |
| Haruan | Striated snakehead | 18 | 50 ± 12 | 18 ± 4.5 | 0.98 ± 0.51 |
Mean (± SD) metal concentration (μg/g) in fish species of Perak River (n = 3).
| Fish Species | Metal Concentration (μg/g wet weight) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cu | Fe | Zn | Pb | ||
| Average | 0.28 ± 0.09 | 1.43 ± 0.33 | 52.25 ± 1.96 | 33.57 ± 4.09 | 1.75 ± 0.35 | |
| Range | 0.18–0.34 | 1.09–1.75 | 51.09–54.51 | 29.18–37.29 | 1.38–2.08 | |
| Average | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 1.34 ± 0.22 | 38.24 ± 8.35 | 24.60 ± 4.60 | 3.96 ± 0.08 | |
| Range | 0.23–0.39 | 1.10–1.54 | 32.43–34.49 | 19.28–27.11 | 3.90–4.02 | |
| Average | 0.34 ± 0.13 | 1.56 ± 0.67 | 31.71 ± 1.74 | 18.27 ± 1.52 | 0.38 ± 0.11 | |
| Range | 0.27–0.49 | 0.79–1.94 | 29.71–32.55 | 16.68–18.40 | 0.30–0.45 | |
| Average | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.31± 0.05 | 32.75 ± 3.00 | 36.43 ± 3.16 | 2.42 ± 0.83 | |
| Range | 0.25–0.28 | 0.06–0.34 | 29.33–34.99 | 33.50–39.77 | 1.83–3.01 | |
| Average | 0.27 ± 0.09 | 1.92 ± 0.16 | 140.80±11.36 | 58.92 ± 2.84 | 1.43 ± 0.29 | |
| Range | 0.17–0.34 | 1.75–2.05 | 127.70–148.01 | 55.67–60.14 | 0.59–1.64 | |
| Average | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.18 | 88.11± 2.10 | 31.34 ± 1.06 | 1.26 ± 0.55 | |
| Range | 0.23–0.31 | 0.97–1.29 | 86.56–90.50 | 30.4–32.50 | 0.87–3.55 | |
| Average | 0.28 ± 0.1 | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 92.45±3.14 | 84.28 ± 9.31 | 4.87± 1.46 | |
| Range | 0.16–0.42 | 0.69–1.27 | 52.60–96.07 | 73.21–98.22 | 3.13–6.09 | |
| Permissible Limit | MFR (1985) [ | 1 | 30 | - | 100 | 2 |
| FAO/WHO (1984) [ | 0.2 | 10 | 300 | 150 | 1.5 | |
| China National Standard [ | 0.1 | 50 | - | - | 0.5 | |
| England / MAFF (2000) [ | 0.2 | 20 | - | 50 | 2 | |
Comparison of trace metals concentrations (μg/g) in freshwater fish species collected from different parts of the world.
| Area | Species | Cd | Cu | Fe | Zn | Pb | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langat River and Engineering Lake, Bangi, Malaysia | 0.05–0.03 | 1.69–1.01 | - | 26.13–20.58 | 0.26–0.99 | [ | |
| Pahang River, Basin, Malaysia | - | 2.24 | - | 1.82 | 0.01 | [ | |
| Chini Lake, Peninsular Malaysia | 0.14 | 0.28 | - | 2.73 | 0.98 | [ | |
| Kelantan River, Malaysia | 0.03 | 0.10 | [ | ||||
| 0.04 | - | - | - | 0.07 | |||
| 0.05 | 0.16 | ||||||
| Paira River, Bangladesh | 0.01–0.03 | 0.2–2.2 | - | - | 0.40–1.00 | [ | |
| 0.20–1.10 | |||||||
| 0.01–0.04 | 0.4–1.6 | ||||||
| Pearl River Delta, China | 0.02 | 1.40 | - | 27.80 | 0.37 | [ | |
| 0.04 | 1.02 | 25.80 | 0.24 |
BAF values of metals in fish species of Perak River.
| Fish species | Fe | Zn | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.69 | 111.9 | 175.0 | |
| 11.48 | 82.0 | 396.0 | |
| 9.52 | 60.90 | 380.0 | |
| 9.83 | 121.43 | 242.0 | |
| 42.28 | 196.40 | 143.0 | |
| 26.45 | 104.46 | 126.0 | |
| 27.76 | 280.93 | 487 |
BSAF values of metals in fish species of Perak River.
| Fish species | Cd | Cu | Fe x 10−4 | Zn | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.09 | 0.05 | 1.49 | 0.60 | 0.06 | |
| 0.10 | 0.05 | 1.09 | 0.44 | 0.14 | |
| 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.90 | 0.32 | 0.01 | |
| 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.93 | 0.65 | 0.08 | |
| 0.09 | 0.07 | 4.01 | 1.05 | 0.05 | |
| 0.09 | 0.04 | 2.51 | 0.56 | 0.04 | |
| 0.09 | 0.04 | 2.64 | 1.50 | 0.17 |
Habitat and common feeds of studied fish species.
| Fish species | Habitat | Feeding habit | Common Feed types | Water layer | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshwater, benthopelagic, | Omnivores | Submerged plants as well as on some filamentous algae and insects, small fish. | Midwater to bottom depths | [ | |
| Freshwater, benthopelagic | Omnivores | Worms and crustaceans | Upland waters | [ | |
| Freshwater, benthopelagic | Omnivores | Insects, crustaceans, worms, algae and aquatic plants | Bottom depths of rivers | [ | |
| Freshwater, benthopelagic | Omnivores | Aquatic macrophytes and submerged land plants, algae and occasionally insects, small fish, worms, and crustaceans. | Mid-level and bottom of the water | [ | |
| Freshwater, benthopelagic | Omnivores | Ant, beetle, bugs, wasps, plant material like seeds, leaf litter, fish parts etc. | Upper parts of small rivers | [ | |
| Brackish, demersal | Carnivores | Invertebrates and small fish | Upper tidal zone | [ | |
| Freshwater, brackish, benthopelagic | Carnivores | Frogs, water bugs, insects, earthworms and smaller fish | Not fixed | [ |
Estimated daily intake (EDI), THQ and TTHQ calculated for seven fish species in Perak River.
| Fish Species | Estimated daily intake (μg/kg/day) | Target hazard quotients (THQ x10ˉ³) | TTHQ x 10ˉ³ | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cu | Fe | Zn | Pb | Cd | Cu | Fe | Zn | Pb | ||
| 0.70 | 3.57 | 130.62 | 83.92 | 4.37 | 1.40 | 0.09 | 1.86 | 0.28 | 1.09 | 4.73 | |
| 0.72 | 3.35 | 95.60 | 61.50 | 9.90 | 1.45 | 0.08 | 1.36 | 0.20 | 2.47 | 5.58 | |
| 0.85 | 3.90 | 79.27 | 45.67 | 0.95 | 1.70 | 0.10 | 1.13 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 3.32 | |
| 0.65 | 0.77 | 81.87 | 91.07 | 6.05 | 1.30 | 0.02 | 1.17 | 0.30 | 1.51 | 4.30 | |
| 0.67 | 4.80 | 352.00 | 147.3 | 3.57 | 1.35 | 0.12 | 5.03 | 0.49 | 0.89 | 7.88 | |
| 0.70 | 2.95 | 220.27 | 78.35 | 3.15 | 1.40 | 0.07 | 3.15 | 0.26 | 0.79 | 5.67 | |
| 0.70 | 2.87 | 231.12 | 210.7 | 12.2 | 1.40 | 0.07 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 3.04 | 8.52 | |
| RfD (USEPA, 2000) [ | 0.5 | 40 | 70 | 300 | 4 | ||||||
Target cancer risk of trace metals due to the consumption of fish from Perak River.
| Fish Species | Target cancer risk (L/kg) | Cumulative Target cancer risk (L/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Cd | ||
| 3.72 x 10−5 | 4.43 x 10−3 | 4.46 x 10−3 | |
| 8.42 x 10−5 | 4.62 x 10−3 | 4.70 x 10−3 | |
| 8.03 x 10−6 | 5.35 x 10−3 | 5.36 x 10−3 | |
| 5.14 x 10−5 | 4.12 x 10−3 | 4.17 x 10−3 | |
| 3.05 x 10−5 | 4.25 x 10−3 | 4.28 x 10−3 | |
| 2.68 x 10−5 | 4.48 x 10−3 | 4.50 x 10−3 | |
| 1.03 x 10−4 | 4.44 x 10−3 | 4.54 x 10−3 | |