Literature DB >> 33103443

Impact of Robotic Surgery on Residency Training for Herniorrhaphy and Cholecystectomy.

Nikita Kadakia1, Kirollos Malek2, Sarah K Lee2, Eun J Lee2, Sigrid Burruss2, Daniel Srikureja2, Kaushik Mukherjee2, Sharon S Lum1,2.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery has increased for common general surgery procedures. This study evaluates how robotic use affects the case distributions of herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy for general surgery residents according to postgraduate year (PGY). We reviewed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) biliary or hernia cases logged by surgical residents in the academic year 2017-2018. Operative reports were reviewed to compare approaches (robotic, laparoscopic, and open) by resident role and PGY level. Open cholecystectomies were excluded. Overall, 470 hernia and 657 cholecystectomy cases were logged. Hernia repairs were performed robotically in 15.9%, laparoscopically in 9.5%, and open in 74.7%. Cholecystectomies were performed robotically in 16.4% and laparoscopically in 83.6%. Residents were teaching assistants in 1.8% of hernia repairs and 1.5% of cholecystectomies. Distribution of cases by technique and PGY level was significantly different for both procedures, with chief residents performing the majority of robotic cholecystectomies (52.6%, P < .0001) and hernia repairs (59.7%, P < .0001). Migration of robotic cases to senior resident level and low percentage of teaching assistant roles held by residents suggest exposure to common operations may be delayed during general surgery residency training. Introduction of new technology in surgical training should be carefully reviewed and may benefit from a structured curriculum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cholecystectomy; herniorrhaphy; robotic surgery; surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33103443     DOI: 10.1177/0003134820964430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted groin hernia repair is primarily performed by specialized surgeons: a scoping review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Anders Gram-Hanssen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 2.  Spin is present in the majority of articles evaluating robot-assisted groin hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danni Lip Hansen; Siv Fonnes; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Implementation of robot-assisted groin hernia repair diminishes the prospects of young surgeons' training: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  D L Hansen; C Christophersen; S Fonnes; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 4.  More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences.

Authors:  Samuel Marcos-Pablos; Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  The evolution of the general surgery resident operative case experience in the era of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Nnenna S Nwaelugo; Matthew I Goldblatt; Jon C Gould; Rana M Higgins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.