Literature DB >> 33103281

Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.

Bettina J Casad1, Jillian E Franks1, Christina E Garasky1, Melinda M Kittleman1, Alanna C Roesler2, Deidre Y Hall3, Zachary W Petzel4.   

Abstract

Recently there is widespread interest in women's underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); however, progress toward gender equality in these fields is slow. More alarmingly, these gender disparities worsen when examining women's representation within STEM departments in academia. While the number of women receiving postgraduate degrees has increased in recent years, the number of women in STEM faculty positions remains largely unchanged. One explanation for this lack of progress toward gender parity is negative and pervasive gender stereotypes, which may facilitate hiring discrimination and reduce opportunities for women's career advancement. Women in STEM also have lower social capital (e.g., support networks), limiting women's opportunities to earn tenure and learn about grant funding mechanisms. Women faculty in STEM may also perceive their academic climate as unwelcoming and threatening, and report hostility and uncomfortable tensions in their work environments, such as sexual harassment and discrimination. Merely the presence of gender-biased cues in physical spaces targeted toward men (e.g., "geeky" décor) can foster a sense of not belonging in STEM. We describe the following three factors that likely contribute to gender inequalities and women's departure from academic STEM fields: (a) numeric underrepresentation and stereotypes, (b) lack of supportive social networks, and (c) chilly academic climates. We discuss potential solutions for these problems, focusing on National Science Foundation-funded ADVANCE organizational change interventions that target (a) recruiting diverse applicants (e.g., training search committees), (b) mentoring, networking, and professional development (e.g., promoting women faculty networks); and (c) improving academic climate (e.g., educating male faculty on gender bias).
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEM; gender inequality; women faculty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33103281     DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0360-4012            Impact factor:   4.164


  13 in total

1.  Turning the Tide for Academic Women in STEM: A Postpandemic Vision for Supporting Female Scientists.

Authors:  Anuj Shah; Isabella Lopez; Bapurao Surnar; Shrita Sarkar; Lunthita M Duthely; Asha Pillai; Tina T Salguero; Shanta Dhar
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  How to identify, encourage, and support suitable candidates for leading roles in scientific societies: The UEG experience.

Authors:  Radislav Nakov; Mohamed Alboraie; Dina Tiniakos
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 6.866

3.  COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time.

Authors:  Mattia Caldarulo; Jared Olsen; Ashlee Frandell; Shaika Islam; Timothy P Johnson; Mary K Feeney; Lesley Michalegko; Eric W Welch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Mentoring and Supporting Our Next Generation of Women Toxicologists.

Authors:  Hollie I Swanson
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  The Women's Leadership Gap in Diabetes: A Call for Equity and Excellence.

Authors:  Jessica L Dunne; Jennifer L Maizel; Amanda L Posgai; Mark A Atkinson; Linda A DiMeglio
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 9.337

Review 6.  U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.

Authors:  Bettina J Casad; Christina E Garasky; Taylor R Jancetic; Anne K Brown; Jillian E Franks; Christopher R Bach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Smashing Stereotypes: Mutual Respect, Key to Embracing Diversity.

Authors:  Faith H A Osier; Linda M Murungi
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2021-01-29

8.  Determining factors of participation and success rates in research funding competitions: Case study.

Authors:  Valentina Diana Rusu; Mihaela Mocanu; Anca-Diana Bibiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Community voices: policy proposals to promote inclusion in academia through the lens of women in science.

Authors:  Sarah A Teichmann; Muzlifah Haniffa; Jasmin Fisher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  Editorial: Women in science: Interventions for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maryam Zoghi; Maria Rubega; Joyce Fung
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.