| Literature DB >> 33102307 |
Priyamvadha Ramesh1, Ajay Chauhan2, Parul Goyal3, Akanksha Singh1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prediabetes is increasingly being studied in the context of its association with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Besides raised HbA1c and sugar levels, the major underlying defect seems to be insulin resistance (IR). Subclinical atherosclerosis, measured by high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) and carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) underlies the pathogenesis of CVD in prediabetes. Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), a novel cardiac biomarker also might have a role in predictin prediabetic heart disease. AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare serum levels of H-FABP in prediabetics and controls and correlate them with the atherosclerotic markers, hsCRP and CIMT. SETTING ANDEntities:
Keywords: CIMT; CVD; H-FABP; HOMA-IR; hsCRP; pre diabetes
Year: 2020 PMID: 33102307 PMCID: PMC7567222 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_296_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Figure 1Showing the measurement of CIMT from a patient in the Department of Radio diagnosis, RMLH. The value recorded was 0.6 mm.
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics among cases and controls
| PARAMETER | CASES ( | CONTROLS ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGE (mean±SD) | 35.96±4.48 | 35.94±4.27 | 0.982 |
| SEX (%) | |||
| Males | 48( | 54( | 0.548 |
| Females | 52( | 46( | |
| BMI(mean±SD) | 24.07±2.71 | 24.08±2.7 | 0.99 |
| WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE (mean±SD) | 82.02±9.22 | 80.11±13.03 | 0.775 |
| SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESURE(mean±SD) | 116.56±17.08 | 114.8±9.00 | 0.521 |
| DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESURE (mean±SD) | 73.76±4.25 | 73.52±5.68 | 0.811 |
Biochemical parameters among cases and controls
| PARAMETER (mean±SD) | CASES ( | CONTROLS ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FASTING BLOOD SUGAR | 110.86±9.79 | 86.68±7.14 | <0.0001 |
| POSTPRANDIAL BLOOD SUGAR | 161.3±21.97 | 119.68±12.1 | <0.0001 |
| HbA1c | 6±0.21 | 4.9±0.46 | <0.0001 |
| FASTING INSULIN LEVELS | 12.22±5.42 | 5.37±1.95 | <0.0001 |
| SERUM H-FABP | 6.38±2.76 | 3.24±2.47 | <0.0001 |
| SERUM hsCRP | 5.75±4.16 | 1.86±1.67 | <0.0001 |
| MEAN CIMT | 0.59±0.11 | 0.45±0.07 | <0.0001 |
Serum fasting insulin levels among cases and controls with a cutoff of 9 mL U/l
| GROUP | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | ||||
| SERUM FASTING INSULIN LEVELS | <9 | 14 (28.00%) | 48 (96.00%) | 62 (62.00%) | <.0001 |
| >=9 | 36 (72.00%) | 2 (4.00%) | 38 (38.00%) | ||
| Total | 50 (100.00%) | 50 (100.00%) | 00.00%) | ||
Serum heart type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP)levels among cases and controls
| SERUM HEART TYPE FABP | Cases | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 50 | 50 | |
| Mean±SD | 6.38±2.76 | 3.24±2.47 | |
| Median | 5.93 | 2.15 | |
| Min-Max | 2.92-11.6 | 0.81-9.26 | |
| Inter quartile Range | 3.630-8.980 | -3.120 |
Mean carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) among cases and controls
| MEAN CAROTID ARTERY INTIMA MEDIA THICKNESS(mm) | CASES | CONTROLS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 50 | 50 | |
| Mean±SD | 0.59±0.11 | 0.45±0.07 | |
| Median | 0.6 | 0.45 | |
| Min-Max | 0.35-0.8 | 0.3-0.6 | |
| Inter quartile Range | 0.500-0.700 | -0.500 |
hsCRP range among cases and controls - Risk stratificationof cardiovascular disease
| SERUM hsCRP | GROUP | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | |||
| 1)<1(LOW) | 2 (4.00%) | 18 (36.00%) | 20 (20.00%) | <.0001 |
| 2)1-<3(AVERAGE) | 14 (28.00%) | 26 (52.00%) | 40 (40.00%) | |
| 3)3-10(HIGH) | 24 (48.00%) | 6 (12.00%) | 30 (30.00%) | |
| 4)>10(INDETERMINANT) | 10 (20.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 10 (10.00%) | |
| Total | 50 (100.00%) | 50 (100.00%) | 00.00%) | |
Figure 2Correlation of H-FABP and hs CRP
Linear regression
| MEAN CAROTID ARTERY INTIMA MEDIAL THICKNESS(mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate linear regression | ||||||
| Unstandardized Coefficients Beta | Standardized Coefficients | 95.0% Confidence Interval for B | ||||
| B | Sth. Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||
| SERUM HEART TYPE FABP | .032 | .004 | .767 | <.0001 | .024 | .040 |
| SERUM HEART TYPE FABP | .927 | .172 | .614 | <.0001 | .581 | 1.273 |
Figure 3Correlation of H-FABP with CIMT