| Literature DB >> 33102296 |
S Sasikumar1, K Maheshkumar2, K Dilara3, R Padmavathi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Air pollution due to road traffic is a solemn health hazard and vehicular emissions due to huge population in the cities are the main reason for the air quality crisis. The study was conducted to assess the degree of impairment in lung function in traffic police personnel exposed to traffic pollution compared to less-exposed healthy subjects.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; health hazards; pulmonary function; traffic police
Year: 2020 PMID: 33102296 PMCID: PMC7567253 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1126_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Anthropometric parameter of exposed (traffic police personnel) group and less-exposed (control) group
| VARIABLE | Less Exposed (control) | Exposed (Traffic police) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs.) | 38.03±10.95 | 39.43±13.87 |
| Height (cm) | 171.14±6.96 | 173.34±4.33 |
| Weight (kg) | 76.18±8.56 | 79.29±13.40 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 25.91±4.48 | 26.40±4.90 |
Figure 1Distribution of traffic police personnel (Exposed group)
Lung function parameters of exposed (traffic police personnel) group and less-exposed (control) group
| Variables | Less Exposed (control) | Exposed (Traffic police) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FVC (L) | 3.61±0.76 | 3.55±0.58 | 0.41 |
| FEV1 (L) | 2.98±0.62 | 2.79±0.51 | 0.002 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 82.80±5.53 | 78.40±7.67 | <0.001 |
| PEFR (L) | 8.01±1.2 | 8.16±1.5 | 0.27 |
| FEF25-75% (L/s) | 3.22±0.94 | 2.66±0.83 | <0.001 |
Values were expressed Mean±SD. Unpaired T test was done to compare between the groups. P<0.05 set as significant. FVC-Forced vital capacity, FEV1-Forced expiratory volume in one second, PEFR-Peak expiratory flow rate, FEF25-75 -Forced expiratory flow rate 25-75
Spirometric parameters among the traffic police personnel according to years of exposure
| variables | Year of exposure | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5 yrs. (n-39) | 5-10 yrs. (n-79) | 10-20 yrs. (n-89) | >20 yrs. (41) | ||
| FVC (L) | 3.99±0.68 | 3.63±0.52 | 3.51±0.55 | 3.30±0.53 | 0.001 |
| FEV1 (L) | 3.84±0.66 | 3.57±0.47 | 3.56±0.51 | 3.35±0.58 | 0.01 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 80.99±6.98 | 79.06±4.95 | 78.42±7.41 | 75.80±11.04 | 0.001 |
| PEFR (L/sec) | 8.41±1.20 | 8.23±1.23 | 8.40±1.62 | 7.52±1.68 | 0.05 |
| FVC25-75% (L) | 3.45±0.89 | 2.69±0.61 | 2.65±0.85 | 2.22±0.73 | 0.001 |
Values were expressed Mean±SD. One way Anova was done followed by Tukey HSD post hoc test. P<0.05 set as significant
Correlation between the pulmonary function and duration of exposure among traffic police personnel
| Correlation coefficient (r) | ||
|---|---|---|
| FVC (L) | -0.38 | <0.001 |
| FEV1 (L) | -0.34 | <0.001 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | -0.2 | 0.001 |
| PEFR (L/s) | -0.12 | 0.04 |
| FVC 25%-75% (L) | -0.34 | <0.001 |