| Literature DB >> 33101963 |
Hua-Wei Yin1,2, Jun-Tao Feng1,2, Bao-Fu Yu1, Yun-Dong Shen1,2, Yu-Dong Gu1,3, Wen-Dong Xu1,2,4,5,6,3,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study was to explore whether the 3-dimensional printing guiding plate system could facilitate the modified procedure for arthroscopic treatment of nondisplaced scaphoid nonunion.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Precise treatment; Scaphoid nonunion
Year: 2020 PMID: 33101963 PMCID: PMC7548393 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Figure 1A, Bone reconstruction of the wrists showing obvious osteosclerosis and pseudarthrosis formed at the fracture line; B, signal enhancement of the scaphoid; C, location of the three fixing axes; D, three guiding tubes, with the length of 5 cm and cross-section inner diameter of 1.1 mm were designed; E, the percutaneous plate system was designed around the skin surface; F, guiding plate systems produced by the high-resolution 3D printing machine.
Figure 2A, Axial image of CT scanning showing scaphoid nonunion; B, intra-operative fluoroscopy showing the three k-wires in the right position as design; C, the tips of three k-wires were retrograded to the fracture side; D, after bone grafting, the k-wires were also drilled into the proximal part of the scaphoid; E, plain radiography at last follow-up showing scaphoid reunion; F, axial image of CT scanning at last follow-up showing scaphoid reunion.
Figure 3Chart of patients flow.
Characteristics of the patients at baseline.
| Group | A ( | B ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (female) | 0 (0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.30 |
| Age | 28.0 (SD 6.9) | 35.0 (SD 10.0) | 0.13 |
| Injured side (right) | 2 (25%) | 4 (50%) | 0.30 |
| Injury-surgery duration (year) | 5.2 (SD 6.5) | 4.8 (SD 5.2) | 0.90 |
| Flexion-extension | 0.86 (SD 0.12) | 0.81 (SD 0.09) | 0.31 |
| Radio-ulnar deviation | 0.81 (SD 0.16) | 0.77 (SD 0.17) | 0.64 |
| Pronation-supination | 1.00 (SD 0.12) | 0.93 (SD 0.19) | 0.41 |
| Grip strength | 0.77 (SD 0.18) | 0.64 (SD 0.23) | 0.24 |
| Pinch strength | 0.79 (SD 0.12) | 0.67 (SD 0.19) | 0.16 |
| Visual Analogue Scale | 5.16 (SD 2.00) | 5.90 (SD 1.76) | 0.45 |
| Modified Mayo Scores | 75.0 (SD 13.6) | 66.9 (SD 11.3) | 0.17 |
| PRWE Scores | 20.6 (SD 13.6) | 31.4 (SD 24.6) | 0.30 |
Changes of the means between groups A and B.
| Outcomes | Group A | Group B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone operation time(minutes) | 69.4 (SD 15.3) | 94.1 (SD 18.7) | 0.012 |
| Flexion-extension | −0.08 (SD 0.07) | −0.09 (SD 0.10) | 0.69 |
| Radio-ulnar deviation | −0.12 (SD 0.05) | −0.10 (SD 0.07) | 0.41 |
| Pronation-supination | −0.00 (SD 0.04) | 0.02 (SD 0.19) | 0.73 |
| Grip strength | 0.11 (SD 0.18) | 0.15 (SD 0.16) | 0.70 |
| Pinch strength | 0.10 (SD 0.09) | 0.18 (SD 0.22) | 0.34 |
| Visual Analogue Scale | −4.20 (SD 2.06) | −4.17 (SD 1.47) | 0.98 |
| Modified Mayo scores | 9.4 (SD 9.8) | 5.6 (SD 12.7) | 0.52 |
| PRWE scores | −11.6 (SD 7.0) | −16.7 (SD 20.2) | 0.52 |
Statistical difference between groups.
Means at baseline and the last follow-up within each group.
| Outcomes | Group A | Group B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- | Post | Pre- | Post | |
| Flexion-extension | 0.86 (SD 0.12) | 0.78 (SD 0.12) | 0.81 (SD 0.09) | 0.71 (SD 0.11) |
| Radio-ulnar deviation | 0.81 (SD 0.16) | 0.68 (SD 0.14) | 0.77 (SD 0.17) | 0.67 (SD 0.14) |
| Pronation-supination | 1.00 (SD 0.12) | 1.00 (SD 0.12) | 0.93 (SD 0.19) | 0.95 (SD 0.05) |
| Grip strength | 0.77 (SD 0.18) | 0.88 (SD 0.09) | 0.64 (SD 0.23) | 0.79 (SD 0.12) |
| Pinch strength | 0.79 (SD 0.12) | 0.89 (SD 0.07) | 0.67 (SD 0.19) | 0.85 (SD 0.06) |
| Visual Analogue Scale | 5.16 (SD 2.00) | 0.96 (SD 0.60) | 5.90 (SD 1.76) | 1.73 (SD 0.84) |
| Modified Mayo scores | 75.0 (SD 13.6) | 84.4 (SD 7.8) | 66.9 (SD 11.3) | 72.5 (SD 10.0) |
| PRWE scores | 20.6 (SD 13.6) | 9.0 (SD 7.0) | 31.4 (SD 24.6) | 14.8 (SD 8.7) |
Statistical difference between groups.