| Literature DB >> 33101276 |
Olena Korvatska1, Kostantin Kiianitsa2, Alexander Ratushny3, Mark Matsushita4, Neal Beeman4, Wei-Ming Chien4, Jun-Ichi Satoh5, Michael O Dorschner6, C Dirk Keene6, Theo K Bammler7, Thomas D Bird8,9, Wendy H Raskind1,4,9,10.
Abstract
The R47H variant in the microglial triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 2 (TREM2) receptor is a strong risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). To characterize processes affected by R47H, we performed an integrative network analysis of genes expressed in brains of AD patients with R47H, sporadic AD without the variant, and patients with polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy (PLOSL), systemic disease with early-onset dementia caused by loss-of-function mutations in TREM2 or its adaptor TYRO protein tyrosine kinase-binding protein (TYROBP). Although sporadic AD had few perturbed microglial and immune genes, TREM2 R47H AD demonstrated upregulation of interferon type I response and pro-inflammatory cytokines accompanied by induction of NKG2D stress ligands. In contrast, PLOSL had distinct sets of highly perturbed immune and microglial genes that included inflammatory mediators, immune signaling, cell adhesion, and phagocytosis. TREM2 knockout (KO) in THP1, a human myeloid cell line that constitutively expresses the TREM2- TYROBP receptor, inhibited response to the viral RNA mimetic poly(I:C) and phagocytosis of amyloid-beta oligomers; overexpression of ectopic TREM2 restored these functions. Compared with wild-type protein, R47H TREM2 had a higher stimulatory effect on the interferon type I response signature. Our findings point to a role of the TREM2 receptor in the control of the interferon type I response in myeloid cells and provide insight regarding the contribution of R47H TREM2 to AD pathology.Entities:
Keywords: NKG2D ligands; aging; inflammation; interferon type I response; microglia; neurodegeneration; senescence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33101276 PMCID: PMC7546799 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.559342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
FIGURE 1Differentially expressed (DE) genes in hippocampi of TREM2 R47H AD and sAD patients. (A–D) Volcano plots displaying DE genes in TREM2 R47H AD (A) and sAD (B) against a baseline of gene expression in controls. y-Axis corresponds to the log10(p-value), and the x-axis displays the log2 (FC, fold changes) value. (C) Venn diagram and list of shared DE genes (FDR < 0.1) between TREM2 R47H AD and sAD. (D) Microglia cell scores were calculated by nSolver (v.3) as an average log-transformed expression of 134 microglia-specific genes that allow comparison of cell abundance across samples (71). Each unit increase in a cell score calculated from log2 transformed data corresponds to a doubling of microglia abundance (NS, non-significant; ∗∗∗p-value < 0.001, ****p-value < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
FIGURE 2Perturbed expression of AD genes/risk factors in TREM2 R47H AD. AD-associated genes altered (FDR < 0.1) in at least one condition against a baseline of gene expression in controls are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SD (∗adj p-value < 0.05; ∗∗adj p-value < 0.01); y-axis displays log2 (FC, fold changes) value.
Top canonical pathways from Ingenuity pathway analysis of DE genes in TREM2 R47H AD and sAD.
| Wnt/Ca + pathway | 3.17 | 2.83 | 0.67 | NFKB2, NFATC3, NFATC4, NFKB1, NFATC2, EP300, CREBBP, NFATC1 |
| Role of RIG1-like receptors in antiviral innate immunity | 2.73 | 3.00 | 0.50 | MAVS, NFKB2, TRAF2, NFKB1, IRF7, IFIH1, EP300, CREBBP, CASP8, TRAF6, IKBKE |
| Inflammasome pathway | 2.64 | 2.65 | 0.64 | TLR4, NFKB2, NFKB1, NOD2, CASP1, CASP8, PYCARD |
| Neuroinflammation signaling pathway | 2.45 | 3.54 | 0.31 | TGFB1, NFATC2, TNFRSF1A, TICAM1, IL6R, TLR9, TREM2, CSF1R, TLR4, IRF7, CREBBP, TRAF6, NFATC4, CCL3, NFKB1, JAK2, EP300, CASP1, HLA-DOB, APP, MFGE8, NFATC1, PYCARD, NFKB2, NFATC3, PSEN2, BCL2, TICAM2, CASP3, CD200, CASP8, IKBKE |
| Induction of apoptosis by HIV1 | 3.74 | 0.82 | 0.25 | NFKB2, TNFRSF11B, NFKB1, TNFRSF1A, BCL2, NFKBIA |
| OX40 Signaling pathway | 3.25 | 1.00 | 0.21 | NFKB2, NFKB1, HLA-DMA, HLA-DRB3, BCL2, NFKBIA |
| Ceramide signaling | 3.14 | 1.34 | 0.25 | NFKB2, TNFRSF11B, NFKB1, TNFRSF1A, BCL2 |
| PI3K/AKT signaling | 3.08 | 1.64 | 0.19 | NFKB2, NFKB1, INPP5D, ITGB1, BCL2, NFKBIA |
FIGURE 3Protein–protein interaction networks and its tightly connected cores (molecular complex detection) formed by differentially expressed genes in TREM2 R47H AD. Protein–protein interaction, molecular complex detection, and Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment were determined using Metascape (www.metascape.org). 800 genes on NanoString panel were used as a background for enrichment calculations. Tables with the corresponding GO term enrichment are shown. Column heading in table: GO, GO ID; Description: Representative GO term; Log10(P), p-value for enrichment.
FIGURE 4TREM2 R47H AD features upregulated interferon type I response and MHC class I-like NKG2D ligands. (A) Role of RIG1-like receptors in antiviral innate immunity, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis-generated diagram shows perturbed gene expression in TREM2 R47H AD brains. Red denotes upregulated genes; gray, not changed compared to control brains; white, not assessed. Perturbed expression (FDR < 0.1) of IFN I type response/antiviral genes (B) and MHC class I-like NKG2D ligands. (C) Data are presented as mean ± SD (∗adj p-value < 0.05; ∗∗adj p-value < 0.01); y-axis displays log2 (FC, fold changes) value.
Top gene sets in TREM2 R47H brains are enriched by immunity-related GO terms.
| MODULE_424 | Regulation of immune response (GO:0050776) | 1.41 | 0.16 | 0.08 | –0.03 | |
| Spindle and kinetochore | Mitotic nuclear division (GO:0007067) | 1.28 | –0.37 | –0.49 | –0.69 | |
| BIOCARTA_CYTOKINE_PATHWAY | Regulation of cytokine production (GO:0001817); positive regulation of JAK-STAT cascade (GO:0046427) | 1.18 | –0.05 | 0.18 | –0.15 | |
| CYTOKINE_BIOSYNTHETIC_PROCESS | Regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process (GO:0042035) | 1.15 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.00 | |
| CYTOKINE_METABOLIC_PROCESS | Regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process (GO:0042035) | 1.15 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.00 | |
| SU_THYMUS | Immune system process (GO:0002376) | 1.13 | 0.19 | –0.21 | –0.06 | |
| FINETTI_BREAST_CANCER_KINOME_RED | Mitotic cell cycle process (GO:1903047) | 1.13 | –0.04 | –0.20 | –0.54 | |
| REACTOME_TRAF6_MEDIATED_IRF7_ACTIVATION | Innate immune response (GO:0045087) | 1.09 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 0.12 | |
| REGULATION_OF_CYTOKINE_SECRETION | Regulation of cytokine secretion (GO:0050707) | 1.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 | –0.01 | |
| REGULATION_OF_CYTOKINE_BIOSYNTHETIC_PROCESS | Regulation of cytokine biosynthetic process (GO:0042035) | 1.08 | –0.04 | 0.06 | –0.06 | |
| YAMASHITA_LIVER_CANCER_WITH_EPCAM_DN | Steroid metabolic process (GO:0008202) | 1.08 | –0.06 | 0.00 | –0.03 | |
| MODULE_478 | Regulation of immune response (GO:0050776) | 1.03 | –0.12 | –0.08 | –0.26 | |
| CROMER_TUMORIGENESIS_UP | Extracellular matrix organization (GO:0030198) | 1.03 | 0.01 | –0.05 | –0.06 | |
| MODULE_315 | Mitotic cell cycle process (GO:1903047) | 1.02 | –0.57 | –0.46 | –0.60 | |
| KARAKAS_TGFB1_SIGNALING | Spindle checkpoint (GO:0031577) | 1.01 | 0.09 | –0.02 | –0.10 | |
| CHEN_ETV5_TARGETS_SERTOLI | Immune system process (GO:0002376) | 1.00 | 0.14 | –0.21 | 0.13 | |
| L_AMINO_ACID_TRANSMEMBRANE_TRANSPORTER_ACTIVITY | Amino acid transport (GO:0006865) | –1.35 | –0.75 | –0.21 | –0.20 | |
| Oxidative phosphorylation (COX and ATPases) | Hydrogen ion transmembrane transport (GO:1902600) | –1.19 | –1.70 | –1.57 | –0.60 | |
| MODULE_307 | Hydrogen ion transmembrane transport (GO:1902600) | –1.19 | –1.72 | –1.49 | –0.59 | |
| BIOCARTA_NDKDYNAMIN_PATHWAY | Endocytosis (GO:0006897), synaptic transmission (GO:0007268) | –1.05 | –1.05 | –0.79 | –0.23 | |
| BIOCARTA_CACAM_PATHWAY | Protein phosphorylation (GO:0006468); synaptic transmission (GO:0007268) | –1.05 | –0.83 | –0.88 | –0.60 | |
| LEIN_LOCALIZED_TO_DISTAL_AND_PROXIMAL_ DENDRITES | Activation of phospholipase C activity (GO:0007202); synaptic transmission (GO:0007268) | –1.04 | –0.72 | –0.49 | –0.25 | |
| GLUTAMINE_FAMILY_AMINO_ACID_METABOLIC_PROCESS | Glutamine family amino acid metabolic process (GO:0009064) | –1.01 | –0.37 | –0.28 | –0.16 | |
FIGURE 5Differentially expressed (DE) and microglia-specific genes in PLOSL. (A) Volcano plots displaying DE genes in PLOSL against a baseline of gene expression in controls. (B) Venn diagram and list of shared DE genes (FDR < 0.1) between TREM2 R47H AD and PLOSL. (C) Enriched ontology clusters in DE TREM2 R47H AD and PLOSL. Metascape cluster analysis of GO term enrichment among DE genes (FDR < 0.1) between TREM2 R47H AD and PLOSL. Eight hundred genes on the NanoString panel were used as a background for enrichment calculations. GO ID, Description: Representative GO term; Log10(P) – p-value for enrichment. (D) Microglia-specific genes (MG) expression is highly perturbed in PLOSL as compared with AD groups. Distribution of fold changes in MG (N = 134); X-axis displays log2 of fold changes between gene expression in cases vs. controls (∗p-value < 0.05; ****p-value < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test); (E) Protein–protein association network formed by differentially expressed MG in PLOSL, as visualized by STRING database (http:/string-db.org).
FIGURE 6Phagocytosis of aggregated pHrodo-labeled amyloid beta-peptide. THP-1, unmodified cells; THP-Cas9, THP1 stably expressing Cas9 nuclease; KO, TREM2 knockout; KO + CV, KO + R47H, KO expressing common variant (CV) or R47H TREM2, respectively. All cells were treated with doxycycline, then incubated with pHrodo-labeled Aβ. Data are shown as mean of biological triplicates ± SD (NS, non-significant; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison).
FIGURE 7TREM2 stimulates IFN I response in THP1 cells. (A) Absence of TREM2 inhibited IFN I response in THP1 TREM2 KO. IFNB expression in non-stimulated cells and after 24 h with poly(I:C) complexes was measured by qRT-PCR. THP1-Cas9, THP1 stably expressing Cas9 nuclease; KO1, KO2 are two independent TREM2 KO clones. IFNB expression was normalized to the level in unstimulated THP1-Cas9. FC – fold changes. (B) Overexpression of TREM2, but not GFP, restored the IFN I response. Assays were performed in biological triplicates and repeated at least two times; (A,B) show representative experiments. KO – TREM2 KO1 cells; KO + GFP – TREM2 KO1 expressing GFP; KO + CV – TREM2 KO1 expressing common variant (CV) TREM2; KO + R47H – TREM2 KO1 expressing R47H TREM2. All cells were treated with doxycycline. TREM2 and IFNB expression was normalized to their levels in unstimulated KO. (C) Expression of R47H TREM2 induced a higher level of IFNB as compared with CV TREM2. Ratio of IFNB to TREM2 expression was calculated for TREM2 KO1 THP1 expressing either CV TREM2 or R47H TREM2 after 24-h poly(I:C) treatment from eight independent biological replicates performed on different days. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Significance in (A,B) was calculated using two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test; significance in (C) was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed t-test (NS, non-significant; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 8Effect of TREM2 on key interferon (IFN) response genes and the NKG2D ligand MICB upon stimulation with a combination of poly(I:C) and IFNβ. All cells were treated with doxycycline. Gene expression in non-stimulated cells and after 24 h stimulation was measured by qRT-PCR. THP1, unmodified cells; KO, TREM2 KO1 line; KO + CV, KO + R47H, TREM2 KO1 expressing common variant (CV) or R47H TREM2, respectively. Gene expression levels were normalized to expression in unstimulated KO. FC, fold changes. Assays were performed in biological triplicates and repeated two times; a representative experiment is shown. Data are shown as mean ± SD (NS, non-significant; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Ratio of IFNB to TREM2 expression was calculated for TREM2 KO1 THP1 expressing either CV TREM2 or R47H TREM2 after 24-h poly(I:C) treatment from biological triplicates; data shown as mean ± SD (∗∗∗p < 0.001, unpaired two-tailed t-test).