| Literature DB >> 33100948 |
Giampaolo Mainini1, Mario Passaro2, Antonio Schiattarella3, Pasquale De Franciscis3, Mariano C Di Donna4, Gennaro Trezza5.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the efficacy of a nutraceutical compound containing Uticlin® (D-mannose, cranberry, bearberry, Olea europaea), inulin, Orthosiphon and Lactobacillus acidophilus, in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in menopausal women.Entities:
Keywords: D-mannose; UTIs; cystitis; menopause; nutraceutical; urinary tract infections
Year: 2020 PMID: 33100948 PMCID: PMC7573332 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2020.99567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prz Menopauzalny ISSN: 1643-8876
Baseline characteristics of the patients
| Characteristics | Group 1 | Group 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (mean ±SD) | 53.0 ±5.8 | 54.1 ±4.5 | 0.30 |
| BMI (mean ±SD) | 24.3 ±5.5 | 25.3 ±3.7 | 0.30 |
| No. of episodes of cystitis in the past 12 months (mean ±SD) | 3.5 ±0.9 | 3.6 ±0.7 | 0.55 |
| Patients with UTIs due to | 40/48 (83.3) | 39/46 (84.7) | 1.00 |
| VAS score (mean ±SD) | 68.2 ±14.1 | 70.1 ±8.6 | 0.43 |
| Daily fluid intake, liter (mean ±SD) | 1.2 ±0.4 | 1.1 ±0.5 | 0.28 |
Data were reported as mean ±standard deviation (SD) and analyzed with Student’s t-test. Probability values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant
Patients without recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) at 6- and 12-month follow-up compared to baseline
| Group | Patients without recurrent UTIs at 6- and 12-month follow-up compared to baseline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-month follow-up | 12-month follow-up | |||
| Group 1 ( | 8/48 | 0.0057 | 11/48 | 0.0005 |
| Group 2 ( | 3/46 | 0.2418 | 4/46 | 0.1168 |
Values are given as n/N (%). Data were analyzed by the χ2 test. Probability values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score
| Group | VAS score | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 12-month follow-up | ||
| Group 1 ( | 68.2 ±14.1 | 45.2 ±7.6 | 0.0001 |
| Group 2 ( | 70.1 ±8.6 | 66.4 ±9.5 | 0.0533 |
Comparison between group 1 and group 2 at baseline and at 12-month follow-up. Data were reported as mean ±standard deviation (SD) and analyzed with Student’s t-test. Probability values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant