| Literature DB >> 33100872 |
Ana María García-Bores1, Nallely Álvarez-Santos1,2, Ma Edith López-Villafranco3, María Patricia Jácquez-Ríos3, Silvia Aguilar-Rodríguez4, Dalia Grego-Valencia4, Adriana Montserrat Espinosa-González1, Edgar Antonio Estrella-Parra1, Claudia Tzasná Hernández-Delgado1, Rocío Serrano-Parrales1, María Del Rosario González-Valle5, José Del Carmen Benítez-Flores5.
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Verbesina crocata (Cav.) Less. (Arnica or Capitaneja) is an endemic plant from Mexico restricted to the western part of the country. The aerial parts are used in traditional medicine for the treatment of wounds and burns. The objective of this investigation was to carry out a pharmacognostic study of V. crocata and establish markers that allow for the recognition of the characteristics of the plant and validate its traditional use. The study includes anatomical and chemical characteristics of the plant as well as evaluations of its antioxidant capacity and wound healing ability in a murine model.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant properties; Catechin derivates; Plant anatomy; Verbesina crocata; Wound healing
Year: 2020 PMID: 33100872 PMCID: PMC7569124 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1V. crocata anatomy. A. Morphology, herbarium voucher; B-M. Leaf characters. B. short cylindrical shape trichome; C–E and G. Uniseriate trichomes with 2–5 cells; F. Oil-secretory cavity; H. Anomocytic stomata; I. Leaf cross section; J. Oil-secretory ducts; K. Collateral vascular bundles; L. Biconvex middle vein, Oil-secretory ducts close-up; M. Petiole cross section; N-O. Stem characters. N. General cross view; and O. Periderm and collenchyma in detail. co: collenchyma; phe: phellema.
Anatomical comparison of Verbesina spp. leaf. 1. V. crocata: in this study 2. V. encelioides (Freire et al., 2005). 3. V. sordescens (Castro et al., 1997). 4. V. glabrata (Smiljanic, 2005). 5. V. macrophylla (Bezerra et al., 2018).
| Anatomical feature | Species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomocytic stomata | ++ | ++ | ---- | ++ | ++ |
| Leaf | A | ---- | ---- | H | H |
| Trichomes | S | S | G | ++ | S |
| Secretory cavities | ++ | ---- | ---- | ---- | ++ |
| Number of vascular bundles in the middle vein: principal/smaller | 3/up to 7 | 1–2/-- | ---- | ---- | 5/-- |
| Secretory ducts | 3* | ----- | 1*,2* | 2* | 3* |
| Secretory idioblasts | Absent | ---- | ---- | ---- | Absent |
| Bundle sheath | ++ | ---- | ---- | ---- | ++ |
| Strata number of parenchyma (palisade/spongy) | 1/4 | ---- | ---- | 2/2–3 | 1/3–5 |
| Crystalliferous idioblasts | Sa (In petiole) | ---- | Absent | P | Absent |
A. amphistomatic; H. hypostomatic; S. Simple (uniseriate, uni-multicellular); G. Glandular; 1*. Exclusively associated with the xylem; 2*. Associates with the xylem and phloem; 3*. Exclusively associated with the phloem; P. Prismatic and/or acicular; Sa. Sandstone. ++ Present; ---- No information
Fig. 2Chromatogram of the hexanic partition (VcH) and methanolic extract of V. crocata (VcME). A) Total ion current (TIC) of VcH. 1. Acetyl-sitosterol. 2. Sitosterol glycoside. B) Chromatogram of VcME. 3. 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxychroman-3-yl-4-(3-amino-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxybutanoate. 4. Phylloflavan. 5. and 6. Catechin-3-glucoside or glycoside (isomer). UV λ = 254 nm.
Fig. 3Full mass spectra of the major compounds detected in V. crocata. 2. Sitosterol glycoside. 4. Phylloflavan. The mass analyser used was an ion trap with quadrupole isolated, positive mode [M+H]. rDA: retro-Diels Alder rearrangement.
Radical scavenging capacity and phenolic content of V. crocata.
| Test | VcME | Quercetin | Catechin |
|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 DPPH (μg/mL) | 432.56 ± 15.72* | 5.01 ± 0.01 | 6.6 ± 0.25 |
| IC50 ABTS (μg/mL) | 1554.57 ± 12.50** | 9.16 ± 0.009 | 6.91 ± 0.03 |
| Phenolic content (mg GAE/g extract) | 19.82 ± 0.77 |
Each value corresponds to the average of three different experiments ± SD values; IC50 = 50% inhibitory concentration; GAE capacity = gallic acid equivalents; -- not determined; *Significant difference with respect to catechin and quercetin (p = 0.0002); **Significant difference with respect to catechin and quercetin (p = 9.34 × 10−14).
Fig. 4Wound healing activity of V. crocata methanolic extract (VcME). (A) Photographic selection of wound closure on different post-excision days; (B) Wound closure speed (WCS mm/day); and (C) Tension strength (g). These data were obtained at the end of the treatment application time (14 days after incision). The data are represented as the means ± S.E. (n = 5).
Fig. 5(A) Size of the healed wound of mice treated with V. crocata (VcME), C+ (Recoveron®) and C- (Vaseline®). (B–D) Representative images of H&E staining sections of the wounds of each treatment. NS. normal skin; L. large; R. regeneration; S. small; SHW. size of the healed wound.
Fig. 6Representative images of the histological analysis of H&E and MT staining sections of the wounds of each treatment. (A) treatment with V. crocata (VcME); (B) Positive control: Recoveron® (C+); (C) Negative control: Vaseline® (C-); (D) Fibroblast number/mouse in each group. *Significant difference with respect to Vaseline® treatment (p = 0.0367). Bv. blood vessel; Cp. capillary; D. dermis; ECM. extracellular matrix; EP. epidermis; F. fibroblast, HP. hyperplasia; IC. immature collagen; MC. mature collagen; SG. sebaceous gland.