Literature DB >> 33100393

Internet Pornography: Some Medical and Spiritual Perspectives.

James McTavish1.   

Abstract

The Internet has made pornography available on a massive scale. Data released by "Pornhub" the world's most popular Internet porn site, reveal that in 2019 alone, there were over 42 billion visits to its website, which in itself is an incredible waste of time and energy, which could be more fruitfully employed. Pornography viewing is poisonous for the conscience and commodifies the human body, reducing it to an object of abusive pleasure. Its negative effects can be broadly seen in three overlapping categories: personal, psychological, and social. The antidote is a renewed call to chastity, that self-mastery that can help direct one's passions in a more fruitful way. Without prayer, we cannot live chastely as "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak" (Matthew 26:41). There is an urgency for the new evangelization to help recapture the dignity of the body and counter the lie of pornography, and to ensure that in the digital world, the face of Christ needs to be seen and his voice heard.
SUMMARY: The first part of this essay outlines some personal, psychological, and social dangers of pornography. Viewing of pornography is harmful, as it objectifies the human body and distorts one's vision of sexuality. The second part of the essay gives some practical advice concerning how to ideally halt or reverse the epidemic of porn viewing, emphasizing the dignity of each person as subject, and reminding us of how a chaste gaze helps one rediscover the real beauty and value of the human body. © Catholic Medical Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; Chastity; Evangelization; Pornography; Prevention; Sexuality; Spirituality and the person

Year:  2020        PMID: 33100393      PMCID: PMC7551539          DOI: 10.1177/0024363920933114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  11 in total

1.  Pornography Viewing: Keep Calm and Carry On.

Authors:  William A Fisher; Taylor Kohut
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  A Profile of Pornography Users in Australia: Findings From the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships.

Authors:  Chris Rissel; Juliet Richters; Richard O de Visser; Alan McKee; Anna Yeung; Theresa Caruana
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-07-15

Review 3.  Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research.

Authors:  Jochen Peter; Patti M Valkenburg
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 4.  The assessment and treatment of adult heterosexual men with self-perceived problematic pornography use: A review.

Authors:  Luke Sniewski; Panteá Farvid; Phil Carter
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Moral Incongruence and Pornography Use: A Critical Review and Integration.

Authors:  Joshua B Grubbs; Samuel L Perry
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2018-02-07

6.  Prevalence and Determinants of Problematic Online Pornography Use in a Sample of German Women.

Authors:  Andreas M Baranowski; Romina Vogl; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Only Bad for Believers? Religion, Pornography Use, and Sexual Satisfaction Among American Men.

Authors:  Samuel L Perry; Andrew L Whitehead
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2018-01-29

8.  Diverse Sexual Behaviors and Pornography Use: Findings From a Nationally Representative Probability Survey of Americans Aged 18 to 60 Years.

Authors:  Debby Herbenick; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Paul Wright; Bryant Paul; Ronna Gradus; Jill Bauer; Rashida Jones
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Neuroscience of Internet Pornography Addiction: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Todd Love; Christian Laier; Matthias Brand; Linda Hatch; Raju Hajela
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 10.  The Potential Associations of Pornography Use with Sexual Dysfunctions: An Integrative Literature Review of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Aleksandra Diana Dwulit; Piotr Rzymski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.