Tatsuya Maruhashi1, Masato Kajikawa2, Shinji Kishimoto1, Yuji Takaeko3, Takayuki Yamaji3, Takahiro Harada3, Yu Hashimoto3, Yiming Han1, Yoshiki Aibara1, Farina Mohamad Yusoff1, Kazuaki Chayama4, Ayumu Nakashima5, Chikara Goto6, Yukiko Nakano3, Yukihito Higashi1,2. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Regeneration and Medicine, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University. 2. Division of Regeneration and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital. 3. Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University. 4. Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University. 5. Department of Stem Cell Biology and Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Sciences, Hiroshima University. 6. Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of General Rehabilitation, Hiroshima International University.
Abstract
AIMS: Volume elastic modulus (VE), an index of arterial elasticity, and arterial diameter of the brachial artery can be automatically measured by a newly developed oscillometric device. We investigated the associations of VE with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the brachial artery and association of oscillometrically measured brachial artery diameter with ultrasonographically measured brachial artery diameter in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Oscillometric measurements of VE and brachial artery diameter and ultrasound measurements of brachial artery diameter, FMD, NID, and IMT of the brachial artery were performed in 50 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The mean values were 2.1±0.4 mmHg/% for VE, 0.31±0.05 mm for brachial IMT, 4.48±0.70 mm for oscillometric brachial artery diameter, and 4.30±0.55 mm for ultrasound brachial artery diameter. VE significantly correlated with brachial IMT (r=0.51, P＜0.001), whereas there was no significant correlation of VE with FMD (r=-0.08, P=0.58) or NID (r=0.07, P=0.61). Multivariate analysis revealed that VE was significantly associated with brachial IMT (β=0.33, P=0.04). Oscillometric brachial artery diameter significantly correlated with ultrasound brachial artery diameter (r=0.79, P＜0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between oscillometric brachial artery diameter and ultrasound brachial artery diameter (mean difference, -0.17 mm; limits of agreement, -1.03 mm to 0.69 mm). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiovascular risk factors, VE may represent atherosclerotic structural alterations of the vascular wall but not vascular function. The accuracy of oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter is acceptable.
AIMS: Volume elastic modulus (VE), an index of arterial elasticity, and arterial diameter of the brachial artery can be automatically measured by a newly developed oscillometric device. We investigated the associations of VE with flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), an index of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation (NID), an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, and intima-media thickness (IMT) of the brachial artery and association of oscillometrically measured brachial artery diameter with ultrasonographically measured brachial artery diameter in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Oscillometric measurements of VE and brachial artery diameter and ultrasound measurements of brachial artery diameter, FMD, NID, and IMT of the brachial artery were performed in 50 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: The mean values were 2.1±0.4 mmHg/% for VE, 0.31±0.05 mm for brachial IMT, 4.48±0.70 mm for oscillometric brachial artery diameter, and 4.30±0.55 mm for ultrasound brachial artery diameter. VE significantly correlated with brachial IMT (r=0.51, P＜0.001), whereas there was no significant correlation of VE with FMD (r=-0.08, P=0.58) or NID (r=0.07, P=0.61). Multivariate analysis revealed that VE was significantly associated with brachial IMT (β=0.33, P=0.04). Oscillometric brachial artery diameter significantly correlated with ultrasound brachial artery diameter (r=0.79, P＜0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between oscillometric brachial artery diameter and ultrasound brachial artery diameter (mean difference, -0.17 mm; limits of agreement, -1.03 mm to 0.69 mm). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiovascular risk factors, VE may represent atherosclerotic structural alterations of the vascular wall but not vascular function. The accuracy of oscillometric measurement of brachial artery diameter is acceptable.
Authors: D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield Journal: Lancet Date: 1992-11-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M R Adams; J Robinson; R McCredie; J P Seale; K E Sorensen; J E Deanfield; D S Celermajer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 24.094