| Literature DB >> 33100213 |
Laura Catalina Blandón-Lotero1, Marta Cecilia Jaramillo-Mejía2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social and community participation is a fundamental component of the development of renewed primary healthcare (PHC). With the recognition of health as a right, such participation is a significant part of the design of public policies aimed at this sector. These policies contribute not only to overcoming inequity in the provision of this type of services but also to a reduction in social inequalities as a whole. Through a comparative analysis, this study aimed to explain the conditions through which ethnic-rural territories of the Colombian Pacific coast participate in health to contribute to the generation of policies and programs in territories with similar conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Colombia; Colombian Pacific littoral; Community participation; Disperse rural area; Health; Primary health care; Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33100213 PMCID: PMC7586684 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01239-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Fig. 1Localization of the Buenaventura District, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Source: Adapted and edited for our work by the authors. From Wikimedia Commons, free access (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colombia_-_Valle_del_Cauca_-_Buenaventura.svg)
Fig. 2Causal analytical model for community participation in health in the Colombian Pacific Littoral. Source: Own elaboration (Jaramillo-Mejía MC, Blandón-Lotero LC. 2020)
Description of conditions and outcome used in community participation in rural health and criteria for assigning value 1
| Conditions and outcome | Description | Criteria for assigning value 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Community social fabric (CC1) | •Community, family and social networks and conditions for the relationship with a sense of community.•Solidary support within the inhabitants. | • Strong civic commitment (presence of more than 1 indicator)• High confidence and sociability (presence of both indicators)• Strong cooperation (presence of both indicators) |
| Trust in institutions (CC2) | • The institution’s ability to influence, from its workspace, the interests of the communitya. aInfluence is understood as an antecedent or proof of trust placed in institutions [ | • Medium or high influence degree of influence of institutional actors in the social fabric. |
| Implementation of PHC (CC3) | • Presence of elements of the renewed PHC, defined by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). | • Presence of 6 or more elements of the renewed PHC. |
| Social Rights Guarantee (CC5) | • Territories with access to social right | • Presence of at least three of the four indicators: employment, housing, education, healthcare. |
| The trajectory social mobilization (CC4) | •Territories that have historically participated in defense of the collective territory, political participation, and their social rights through a defined organizational agenda. | • Presence of conceptualizations of collective identity by ethnic organizations.• Understandings about power, politics, and the state by community leaders.• The leaders identify the organizational characteristics of the territory.• Community leaders identify social mobilization as a form of struggle. • Identification of collective identity construction processes by community leaders. |
| Community participation | •Set of territories with active participation processes in their health problems. | •Presence of organizations working for common interests. •Participation of organizations in decision-making spaces. •Perceived presence of community leadership. •Planning and taking actions to improve the health of the territory. •Identification and prioritization of health needs and problems by the community. |
a1, presence of the condition; 0, absence of the condition
Source: Elaboration based in Jaramillo-Mejía, Gil, and Núñez [30]; Mira and Rojas [31]; Parra [32]; Nakamura and Siregar [33]; Téllez [34]; Goodman [25] and Jackson, Cleverly, Poland, Burman, Edwards, and Robertson [35]
Synthetic matrix of calibrated data
| Case | Sense of community | Context | History | Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric | Institutions | PHC | Rights | Mobilization | Community participation | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Source: Own elaboration
Complex and intermediate solution results
| Solutions | Consistency | Coverage | No. of cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000000 | 0.500000 | 2 | |
| 1.000000 | 0.250000 | 1 | |
| 1.000000 | 0.250000 | 1 | |
| Solution coverage: | 1.000000 | ||
| Solution consistency | 1.000000 |
Source: Authors. Calculations performed using fsQCA 2.5 software
Results with a parsimonious solution
| Solutions | Consistency | Coverage | No. of cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000000 | 0.500000 | 2 | |
| 1.000000 | 0.250000 | 1 | |
| 1.000000 | 0.250000 | 1 | |
| Solution coverage: | 1.000000 | ||
| Solution consistency | 1.000000 |
Source: Calculations performed using fsQCA 2.5 software