Kezhou Wu1,2, Leila Laouar1, Janet A W Elliott3,4, Nadr M Jomha1. 1. Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Successful preservation of articular cartilage will increase the availability of osteochondral allografts to treat articular cartilage defects. We compared the effects of 2 methods for storing cartilage tissues using 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels or femoral condyles at -196°C: (a) storage with a surrounding vitrification solution versus (b) storage without a surrounding vitrification solution. We investigated the effects of 2 additives (chondroitin sulfate and ascorbic acid) for vitrification of articular cartilage. DESIGN: Healthy porcine stifle joints (n = 11) from sexually mature pigs were collected from a slaughterhouse within 6 hours after slaughtering. Dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol were permeated into porcine articular cartilage using an optimized 7-hour 3-step cryoprotectant permeation protocol. Chondrocyte viability was assessed by a cell membrane integrity stain and chondrocyte metabolic function was assessed by alamarBlue assay. Femoral condyles after vitrification were assessed by gross morphology for cartilage fractures. RESULTS: There were no differences in the chondrocyte viability (~70%) of 10-mm osteochondral dowels after vitrification with or without the surrounding vitrification solution. Chondrocyte viability in porcine femoral condyles was significantly higher after vitrification without the surrounding vitrification solution (~70%) compared to those with the surrounding vitrification solution (8% to 36%). Moreover, articular cartilage fractures were not seen in femoral condyles vitrified without surrounding vitrification solution compared to fractures seen in condyles with surrounding vitrification solution. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrification of femoral condyle allografts can be achieved by our optimized approach. Removing the surrounding vitrification solution is advantageous for vitrification outcomes of large size osteochondral allografts.
OBJECTIVE: Successful preservation of articular cartilage will increase the availability of osteochondral allografts to treat articular cartilage defects. We compared the effects of 2 methods for storing cartilage tissues using 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels or femoral condyles at -196°C: (a) storage with a surrounding vitrification solution versus (b) storage without a surrounding vitrification solution. We investigated the effects of 2 additives (chondroitin sulfate and ascorbic acid) for vitrification of articular cartilage. DESIGN: Healthy porcine stifle joints (n = 11) from sexually mature pigs were collected from a slaughterhouse within 6 hours after slaughtering. Dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, and propylene glycol were permeated into porcine articular cartilage using an optimized 7-hour 3-step cryoprotectant permeation protocol. Chondrocyte viability was assessed by a cell membrane integrity stain and chondrocyte metabolic function was assessed by alamarBlue assay. Femoral condyles after vitrification were assessed by gross morphology for cartilage fractures. RESULTS: There were no differences in the chondrocyte viability (~70%) of 10-mm osteochondral dowels after vitrification with or without the surrounding vitrification solution. Chondrocyte viability in porcine femoral condyles was significantly higher after vitrification without the surrounding vitrification solution (~70%) compared to those with the surrounding vitrification solution (8% to 36%). Moreover, articular cartilage fractures were not seen in femoral condyles vitrified without surrounding vitrification solution compared to fractures seen in condyles with surrounding vitrification solution. CONCLUSIONS: Vitrification of femoral condyle allografts can be achieved by our optimized approach. Removing the surrounding vitrification solution is advantageous for vitrification outcomes of large size osteochondral allografts.
Articular cartilage defects are a common injury treated in orthopedic clinics around
the world.[1,2] Cartilage
defects can develop into osteoarthritis without proper intervention or treatment,
especially in young and active adults who often suffer from acute trauma to the
knee.[2,3] Osteochondral
allografting has proven to be an effective surgical procedure to treat articular
cartilage defects.[4-6] Depending on the
size of the articular cartilage defect, the procedure requires grafts that range
from small to large pieces of osteochondral tissue. Fresh articular cartilage grafts
are the gold standard used for cartilage repair in orthopedic surgery. Fresh
articular cartilage grafts can be stored up to 28 days but may not be delivered to
patients in the operating room in time due to the long time frame of surgical
preparation. Each graft requires regulatory clearance for infectious disease
testing, graft size matching, patient preparation, and arrangement of a surgical
suite.[7-10] The short storage period of
fresh articular cartilage grafts and the absence of chondrocyte survival and matrix
distortion in frozen grafts[5,9]
makes the long-term preservation of large articular cartilage grafts very important.
Successful cryopreservation of articular cartilage can increase the availability of
articular cartilage allografts as an alternative transplantation source to treat
large articular cartilage defects in clinical practice.Vitrification is an “ice-free” preserving method developed for long-term storage of
cells and tissues in a “glassy” solid state at extremely low temperatures (e.g.,
−196°C). Cryopreservation by vitrification has been reported to preserve small
articular cartilage grafts such as rabbit,
porcine,[12,13] and human
osteochondral grafts with a size from 3-mm to 10-mm diameter. However,
vitrification of full knee condyles has not yet been reported in the literature, and
this is important because of the potential for surgical repair of large articular
cartilage defects.[14,15] In current practice, a sufficient amount of cryoprotectant
(CPA) needs to be permeated into the articular cartilage for successful
vitrification (see
).
CPA permeation is the essential step to avoid ice formation in the articular
cartilage matrix during the cooling/warming processes of vitrification.[12,14,16,17] The
development of CPA permeation protocols can be optimized using mathematical
modelling. Our group developed an optimized 7-hour stepwise CPA permeation protocol
for articular cartilage with 2-mm thickness,
and the experimental results confirmed the efficiency of this protocol for
10-mm diameter porcine osteochondral dowels with a promising chondrocyte survival of
approximately 75%.
Since our CPA permeation approach leads to a vitrifiable concentration of
CPAs throughout the cartilage tissue and this has been successful in smaller
osteochondral tissue fragments,
it is essential to document its effectiveness on a larger scale such as full
femoral condyles. Unfortunately, vitrification of full femoral condyle articular
cartilage is challenging due to the large volume of tissue. Tissue cracking caused
by inhomogeneous thermal expansion of the glassy CPAs around the sample is an
unsolved problem. Removing the surrounding CPAs from the tissue before storage in
liquid nitrogen may be an appropriate approach to mitigate the cracking effect for
the vitrification of large tissues. Using additives to protect cells from exposure
to CPAs is another approach to improve cryopreservation protocols.
Additives such as chondroitin sulfate, ascorbic acid, or glucosamine have
been shown to improve porcine chondrocyte survival after exposure to a high molarity
CPA cocktail solution.
Figure 1.
Cryoprotectant permeation into the articular cartilage graft with a bone base
before plunging into liquid nitrogen for vitrification.
Cryoprotectant permeation into the articular cartilage graft with a bone base
before plunging into liquid nitrogen for vitrification.Therefore, we present the vitrification of intact porcine femoral condyles using an
optimized approach based on an established 7-hour protocol. Our aim is to develop a
successful protocol for long-term storage of intact femoral allografts via
vitrification for clinical repair of articular cartilage defects. Our objectives
with this experiment were to compare vitrification results of 10-mm diameter
osteochondral dowels and femoral condyles when stored with/without surrounding
vitrification solution and the effects of chondroitin sulfate and ascorbic acid on
cell viability after vitrification. We hypothesized that intact porcine femoral
articular cartilage can be successfully vitrified once sufficient concentrations of
CPA have permeated into the cartilage matrix and chondrocytes, even if the
surrounding vitrification solution is removed before vitrification. We compared the
effects of 2 methods for storing cartilage tissues using 10-mm diameter
osteochondral dowels or femoral condyles at −196°C: (a) storage with a surrounding
vitrification solution versus (b) storage without a surrounding vitrification
solution. We investigated the effects of 2 additives (chondroitin sulfate and
ascorbic acid) for vitrification of articular cartilage.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Articular Cartilage
Healthy porcine stifle joints (n = 11) from sexually mature pigs
(age approximately 54 weeks) were collected from a slaughterhouse within 6 hours
after slaughtering for commercial consumption. No animals were specially
sacrificed for this research project. The use of animal tissue for research was
approved by the Research Ethics Office at the University of Alberta. Porcine
joints were immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and transported to the
university laboratory in a cooler bag. On arrival in the laboratory, the joints
were dissected and the femoral condyles were isolated from the tibia bone in a
fume food designated for animal sample processing, followed by 15-minute
cleaning in 100 mL PBS + antibiotics (100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL
streptomycin, 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B; Gibco) under a sterile biosafety cabin.
After the cleaning, the femoral condyles were immersed in sterile DMEM complete
medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium Nutrient Mixture F12 [DMEM-F12; Gibco]
supplemented with 10% calf bovine serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 units/mL
penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B [Gibco]) and
kept in the fridge at 4°C until the vitrification experiments. When
osteochondral dowels were required, they were cut from the tissue with a sharp
cutting device with a 10-mm diameter opening.
Experimental Variables
Experimental variables for the vitrification experiments are shown in red text in
. We evaluated 2 storage methods for articular cartilage vitrification
(with surrounding solution in a container, VS+; or without surrounding solution
in a bag, VS−) using both 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels (cartilage on a
10-mm thick bone base) and full femoral condyles (approximate length × width ×
height: 50 × 30 × 20 mm3). In addition, we evaluated the inclusion of
additives (chondroitin sulfate, CS; or ascorbic acid, AA) to compare their
effects on chondrocyte survival after vitrification.
Figure 2.
Experimental variables (in red text) for vitrification of articular
cartilage graft.
Experimental variables (in red text) for vitrification of articular
cartilage graft.
Vitrification Flowchart
During the vitrification experiments, samples of either 10-mm diameter
osteochondral dowels or full femoral condyles were exposed to the multi-CPA
loading solution (by immersion in 50 mL for dowels or 200 mL for full femoral
condyles) prepared with DMEM-F12 medium following the 7-hour 3-step loading
protocol developed previously[13,18]; see
for the CPA concentrations, durations, and temperatures of each step
indicated in the orange box. Once the CPA loading procedure was completed, the
cartilage samples were transferred to the containers (15 mL Falcon tube with 5
mL vitrification solution for the dowels, 250 mL plastic cup with 100 mL
vitrification solution for the femoral condyles, VS+ in
, see
), or to the freezing bags (one sample per bag, for both dowels and
femoral condyles, VS− in
, see
) which were vacuumed to remove the air and sealed quickly with a
packaging machine. Solution 2 (3 M DMSO + 3 M EG + 3 M PG) prepared with
DMEM-F12 was precooled to −10°C and used as the vitrification solution for
packaging, VS+. All samples (prelabelled with ID number and experiment date)
were then plunged into the LN2 Dewar for storage.
Figure 3.
Flowchart for vitrification of articular cartilage graft using a 3-step
cryoprotectant loading protocol.
Figure 4.
The 2 packaging methods for vitrification of articular cartilage graft.
(A) A 15-mL Falcon tube for the osteochondral dowel and
a 250-mL plastic container with a white lid for the condyle to be
vitrified with surrounding CPAs. (B) A freezing bag and the
vacuumed machine for the osteochondral dowel and the condyle to be
vitrified without surrounding CPAs.
Flowchart for vitrification of articular cartilage graft using a 3-step
cryoprotectant loading protocol.The 2 packaging methods for vitrification of articular cartilage graft.
(A) A 15-mL Falcon tube for the osteochondral dowel and
a 250-mL plastic container with a white lid for the condyle to be
vitrified with surrounding CPAs. (B) A freezing bag and the
vacuumed machine for the osteochondral dowel and the condyle to be
vitrified without surrounding CPAs.
Assessment of Articular Cartilage
Chondrocyte Viability via Cell Membrane Integrity Stain
Chondrocyte viability was quantified via cell membrane integrity using
fluorescent microscopy similar to our previous work.
After tissue warming and CPA removal, a vibratome (vibratome-1000
plus, the Vibratome Company, St. Louis, MO) was used for sectioning
cartilage slices. The vibratome basin was filled with 500 mL 1× PBS (4°C) to
avoid cartilage dehydration during sectioning. The osteochondral dowel was
placed in a metal sample holder and cartilage slices with a thickness of 100
µm were sectioned in a transverse plane, then transferred to one labelled
well of a 24-well plate filled with 2.0 mL X-Vivo 10 (Lonza) and kept on
crushed ice with distilled water before sample staining. For imaging, a
mixture of 2 fluorescent dyes: 6.25 µM Syto 13 (Molecular Probes) and 9 µM
propidium iodide (PI; Sigma) were used to label membrane-intact (live cell,
green color) and membrane-damaged (dead cell, red color) chondrocytes.
Cartilage slices were placed on labelled microscope slides and excess X-Vivo
on the slices was removed with Kimwipe. Each slice was overlaid with
approximately 50 µL stain mixture and covered with a coverslip. Cartilage
slices were incubated in the dark for 10 to 15 minutes to allow dye
permeation into chondrocytes. Cartilage slices were imaged using a Nikon
digital camera (model: DS-Fi2) under a Nikon inverted fluorescent microscope
(model: ECLIPSE Ti-5). Dual filters with the following spectra peak maxima:
excitation/emission: 488 nm/503 nm and 535 nm/617 nm were used to image all
the slices. The cell viability for each cartilage slice was determined by
counting the numbers of the green-stained (viable) cells and red-stained
(nonviable) cells, using custom made software Viability 3.2 (Locksley
McGann, University of Alberta).
An inclusion criteria of positive control cell viability from fresh
cartilage slices of greater than 85% was used to screen healthy cartilage
for the study. Normalized cell viability of the experimental samples was
determined according to the following formula:
Chondrocyte Metabolic Activity Assessed with AlamarBlue
Chondrocyte metabolic activity was determined by alamarBlue as documented in our
previous work.
AlamarBlue is a fluorescence indicator based on the reduction reaction of
metabolically active cells to convert the blue-colored resazurin
(nonfluorescent) into red-colored resorufin (highly fluorescent). Briefly, after
tissue warming and CPA removal, cartilage from each experimental group was
removed from the osteochondral dowel bone base and weighed and washed in 5 mL
sterile PBS supplemented with antibiotics for 15 minutes. Positive controls
consisted of articular cartilage that was neither exposed to CPAs nor vitrified;
negative controls were articular cartilage plunged into liquid nitrogen without
CPAs. Cartilage samples were then incubated in an alamarBlue (Invitrogen,
Burlington, Canada) assay solution containing 5 mL X-VIVO 10 (a serum-free
medium; Lonza) supplemented with 0.1 mM ascorbic acid, 100 nM dexamesasone, and
10 ng/mL transforming growth factor beta 1, and mixed with 500 µL alamarBlue in
a 6-well plate and incubated at 37°C for fluorescence readings every 24 hours
for 4 days using Cytofluor 2.0 software. The fluorescence parameters were set to
emission wavelengths of 580/50 nm, excitation wavelengths of 485/20 nm, and a
gain of 45. Fluorescence was measured for each sample per experimental group at
24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 96 hours. Readings of blank samples
(alamarBlue assay solution without cartilage samples) were subtracted from
readings of the experimental samples to yield a value in relative fluorescent
units (RFU) divided by weight in grams of articular cartilage. The RFU readings
of chondrocytes after vitrification were normalized to the fresh positive
controls and presented as a percentage in the figures.
Cooling and Warming Temperature Profile of Full Femoral Condyles
To compare the cooling and warming rates of articular cartilage stored with
different methods, a dual thermometer with 2 thermocouple detectors was used to
determine the temperature as a function of time of full femoral condyles
(N = 3 condyles per group, in a container or in a bag) as
they were cooled from −10°C to −196°C then warmed to 37°C. Two 2-mm-deep holes
were drilled on the weight bearing area of the condyle cartilage surface to
place the thermal detectors for temperature measurement. The temperatures of
articular cartilage at different time points (0 minutes, 1 minute, 3 minutes, 5
minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes) were recorded and
plotted to observe the cooling and warming rates of articular cartilage.
Gross Morphology of Full Femoral Condyles after Vitrification
To compare the effects of packaging methods on the morphology of femoral condyles
after vitrification, cartilage fractures on condyle surface were identified by
gross imaging. After tissue warming and CPA removal from the vitrified femoral
condyles, the condyles were placed on a paper towel and imaged using a digital
camera (Canon PowerShot ELPH 180).
Statistical Analysis
The numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the
results. The equality of variances for experimental variables was determined by
Levene’s test before multiple comparisons. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with
post hoc tests (Tukey test) or nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney
U test) was performed for multiple comparisons on sample
cell viability or metabolic activity based on the sample configuration for
different experimental conditions. The numerical data were analyzed using SPSS
20.0 software for statistical significance and figures were plotted with
GraphPad prism 8.0 software. The P values are reported in the
results or figure legends, statistical significance in the figures was indicated
with asterisks respectively: * indicates P < 0.05, **
indicates P < 0.01.
Results
Chondrocyte Viability of 10-mm Diameter Osteochondral Dowels Using 2
Packaging Methods
Representative fluorescent images of cartilage slices from osteochondral dowels
among the 4 experimental groups after vitrification are shown in
to
. As shown in
, for the CS group, the normalized chondrocyte viability of osteochondral
dowels stored with vitrification solution in a Falcon tube was 74.4 ± 8.9% (mean
± SD), while the normalized chondrocyte viability in the osteochondral dowels
stored without vitrification solution in a bag was 70.4 ± 6.3%. For the AA
group, the normalized chondrocyte viability of osteochondral dowels stored with
vitrification solution in a tube was 67.4 ± 12.1%, and the normalized
chondrocyte viability in the osteochondral dowels stored without vitrification
solution in a bag was 69.8 ± 8.4%. There were no statistically significant
differences between the storage with or without vitrification solution and the
usage of CS or AA as additives during the vitrification procedure
(P > 0.05).
Figure 5.
Chondrocyte viability of 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels after
vitrification using 2 storage methods with (in a Falcon tube) or without
(in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution. (A) A
representative image from an osteochondral dowel in the CS group after
vitrification with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container (Note:
Green stain indicates cell-membrane-intact and viable chondrocytes, red
and yellow stains indicate cell-membrane-ruptured and dead
chondrocytes). (B) A representative image from an
osteochondral dowel in the CS group after vitrification without
surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag. (C) A representative
image from an osteochondral dowel in the AA group after vitrification
with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container. (D) A
representative image of an osteochondral dowel in the AA group after
vitrification without surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag.
(E) Quantification of chondrocyte viability of
osteochondral dowels after vitrification between 2 storage methods in 2
additive groups.
Chondrocyte viability of 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels after
vitrification using 2 storage methods with (in a Falcon tube) or without
(in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution. (A) A
representative image from an osteochondral dowel in the CS group after
vitrification with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container (Note:
Green stain indicates cell-membrane-intact and viable chondrocytes, red
and yellow stains indicate cell-membrane-ruptured and dead
chondrocytes). (B) A representative image from an
osteochondral dowel in the CS group after vitrification without
surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag. (C) A representative
image from an osteochondral dowel in the AA group after vitrification
with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container. (D) A
representative image of an osteochondral dowel in the AA group after
vitrification without surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag.
(E) Quantification of chondrocyte viability of
osteochondral dowels after vitrification between 2 storage methods in 2
additive groups.
Chondrocyte Viability and Metabolic Activity of Full Femoral Condyles after
Vitrification Using 2 Packaging Methods
Representative fluorescent images of cartilage slices from full femoral condyles
among the 4 experimental groups after vitrification are show in
to
. As shown in
, for the CS group, the normalized chondrocyte viability of full femoral
condyles stored without vitrification solution in a bag (69.8 ± 9.0%) was
significantly higher than the normalized chondrocyte viability of the full
femoral condyles stored with vitrification solution in a plastic container (35.6
± 14.4%; P = 0.03). For the AA group, the normalized
chondrocyte viability of full femoral condyles stored without vitrification
solution in a bag (67.3 ± 22.7%) was significantly higher than the normalized
chondrocyte viability of the full femoral condyles stored with vitrification
solution in a plastic container (7.9 ± 9.6%; P = 0.01).
Representative images of chondrocyte metabolic activity of cartilage post
vitrification of full femoral condyles among the 4 experimental groups from Day
0 to Day 4 are shown in
. After cartilage treatment with CS or AA and vitrification in a bag
without vitrification solution, the viable chondrocytes showed an active
metabolic function at Day 4 similar to the positive control group. However,
chondrocytes from full femoral condyles vitrified in a container showed no
cellular activity in both groups treated with either CS or AA, similar to the
negative control group. In addition, a similar normalized chondrocyte metabolic
activity was seen in groups treated with CS or AA when using the same storage
method (either stored in a container or stored in a bag) during the
vitrification procedure (see
).
Figure 6.
Chondrocyte viability and metabolic activity of full femoral condyles
after vitrification using 2 packaging methods. (A) A
representative image from a full condyle in the CS group after
vitrification with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container (Note:
Green stain indicates cell-membrane-intact and viable chondrocytes, red
and yellow stains indicate cell-membrane-ruptured and dead
chondrocytes). (B) A representative image from a full
condyle in the CS group after vitrification without surrounding
cryoprotectants in a bag. (C) A representative image from a
full condyle in the AA group after vitrification with surrounding
cryoprotectants in a container. (D) A representative image
from a full condyle in the AA group after vitrification without
surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag. (E) Quantification of
chondrocyte viability of full femoral condyles after vitrification
showing differences between 2 storage methods in the 2 additive groups.
(F) Representative alamarBlue images of chondrocyte
metabolic activity in full femoral condyles after vitrification with (in
a container) or without (in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution.
(G) Normalized chondrocyte metabolic activity of the 4
experimental groups after vitrification followed by the 4-day alamarBlue
assessment.
Chondrocyte viability and metabolic activity of full femoral condyles
after vitrification using 2 packaging methods. (A) A
representative image from a full condyle in the CS group after
vitrification with surrounding cryoprotectants in a container (Note:
Green stain indicates cell-membrane-intact and viable chondrocytes, red
and yellow stains indicate cell-membrane-ruptured and dead
chondrocytes). (B) A representative image from a full
condyle in the CS group after vitrification without surrounding
cryoprotectants in a bag. (C) A representative image from a
full condyle in the AA group after vitrification with surrounding
cryoprotectants in a container. (D) A representative image
from a full condyle in the AA group after vitrification without
surrounding cryoprotectants in a bag. (E) Quantification of
chondrocyte viability of full femoral condyles after vitrification
showing differences between 2 storage methods in the 2 additive groups.
(F) Representative alamarBlue images of chondrocyte
metabolic activity in full femoral condyles after vitrification with (in
a container) or without (in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution.
(G) Normalized chondrocyte metabolic activity of the 4
experimental groups after vitrification followed by the 4-day alamarBlue
assessment.
Temperature Profile of Full Femoral Condyles during the Vitrification and
Warming Processes
A representative image of a full condyle with 2 positions on the cartilage
surface for temperature measurement is shown in
. Temperatures during cooling and warming of full femoral condyles
vitrified with (in a container) or without (in a bag) a surrounding
vitrification solution during plunge into liquid nitrogen (−196°C) followed by
warming to 37°C in a water bath are shown in
. The temperature of full femoral condyles stored in a bag reached below
−150°C between 2 and 3 minutes after plunge into liquid nitrogen, while full
femoral condyles stored in a container took more than 15 minutes to reach below
−150°C. During the warming process, the full femoral condyles stored in a bag
reached above 0°C within 1 minute, compared to full femoral condyles stored in a
container that took more than 7 minutes to reach 0°C.
Figure 7.
Temperature profile during cooling/warming and gross morphology of
porcine femoral condyles after vitrification. (A) Two
points on the porcine condyle cartilage surface for temperature
measurement. (B) The temperatures of full femoral condyles
(N = 3) when vitrified with (in a container) or
without (in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution during plunge
into liquid nitrogen followed by warming back to 37°C in water bath.
Inset shows expanded view of temperature data within the first 3
minutes. (C) A condyle vitrified with surrounding
cryoprotectants in a plastic container. (D) A condyle
vitrified without surrounding cryoprotectants in a sealed vacuumed
freezing bag. (E) Gross appearance of a post-vitrified
condyle from the container and CS group (Blue arrows: cartilage
fracture). (F) Gross appearance of a post-vitrified condyle
from the vacuumed freezing bag and CS group. (G) Gross
appearance of a post-vitrified condyle from the container and AA group
(Blue arrows: cartilage fracture). (H) Gross appearance of
a post-vitrified condyle from the vacuumed freezing bag and AA
group.
Temperature profile during cooling/warming and gross morphology of
porcine femoral condyles after vitrification. (A) Two
points on the porcine condyle cartilage surface for temperature
measurement. (B) The temperatures of full femoral condyles
(N = 3) when vitrified with (in a container) or
without (in a bag) a surrounding vitrification solution during plunge
into liquid nitrogen followed by warming back to 37°C in water bath.
Inset shows expanded view of temperature data within the first 3
minutes. (C) A condyle vitrified with surrounding
cryoprotectants in a plastic container. (D) A condyle
vitrified without surrounding cryoprotectants in a sealed vacuumed
freezing bag. (E) Gross appearance of a post-vitrified
condyle from the container and CS group (Blue arrows: cartilage
fracture). (F) Gross appearance of a post-vitrified condyle
from the vacuumed freezing bag and CS group. (G) Gross
appearance of a post-vitrified condyle from the container and AA group
(Blue arrows: cartilage fracture). (H) Gross appearance of
a post-vitrified condyle from the vacuumed freezing bag and AA
group.Morphologies of full femoral condyles after vitrification and warming are shown
in
to
. The full femoral condyles were either stored with surrounding CPAs in a
plastic container (
) or stored without surrounding CPAs in a vacuumed bag (
). After warming and CPA removal, condyles stored with vitrification
solution in the containers (either treated with CS,
, or AA,
) demonstrated visible fractures in the cartilage surface (indicated by
blue arrows) compared to those condyles stored without vitrification solution in
vacuumed bags (either treated with CS,
, or AA,
).
Discussion
Cryopreservation by vitrification is a promising technology to preserve cells and
tissue for long term without ice crystal formation, and it can be achieved by 2 approaches
; the first approach is an equilibrium approach which involves permeating high
concentrations of CPA into the cells and matrix, and the second approach is a
nonequilibrium approach which involves cooling the sample fast enough to outrun ice
formation and kinetically avoid ice crystal formation. Both approaches require
permeating large amounts of CPAs into the tissue. CPA permeation is a main factor
that determines whether the vitrification of articular cartilage tissue will be
successful. Shardt et al.
proposed an optimized 7-hour CPA permeation protocol based on an engineering
model incorporating predictions of CPA concentration, freezing point, and tissue
vitrifiability. In the current study, we found that after applying the optimized
7-hour CPA permeation protocol, the chondrocyte viability after vitrification in
small osteochondral dowels (10-mm diameter on a bone base) showed approximately 70%
chondrocyte viability after vitrification for both storage in a Falcon plastic tube
surrounded with CPAs and storage in a vacuumed bag without CPAs (
). These results regarding cell membrane integrity on 10-mm diameter porcine
osteochondral dowels with 2-mm thick articular cartilage after vitrification are
consistent with our previous findings (~75%) using the same osteochondral dowel size
of human articular cartilage.
Our results are comparable to Brockbank et al.’s best
findings in the 6-mm diameter porcine femoral cartilage plugs after vitrification
using alamarBlue assay for chondrocyte assessment.
Next, we found a similar chondrocyte viability (~65% to 70%) in the full
femoral condyles for which the surrounding CPAs were removed from the containers
before plunging into liquid nitrogen (
). These results indicate that the 7-hour CPA permeation strategy
is applicable to the vitrification of full condyle articular cartilage
tissue.Importantly, we found no statistically significant differences in the chondrocyte
viability of 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels between the storage in a Falcon
plastic tube with surrounding CPAs and storage in a vacuumed bag without surrounding
CPAs (
). This result indicated that even if the surrounding CPAs are removed from
around the osteochondral tissue during cooling to −196°C, the permeated CPA in the
articular cartilage is sufficient to protect the chondrocytes from freezing
injuries. Thus, we addressed the gaps in the literature to show that a surrounding
CPA solution is not required for vitrification of articular cartilage. This is
contrary to the current cryopreservation practices, in which articular cartilage is
immersed in a certain amount of CPA solution for vitrification before cooling below
−130°C.[11,12,14,23] We propose that high CPA concentration within the matrix is
sufficient to transform the tissue into a solid without ice formation when the
articular cartilage is cooled sufficiently rapidly to cryogenic temperatures.Following the CPA permeation, articular cartilage is usually kept in a high
concentration CPA solution[12-14] and plunged
into liquid nitrogen at −196°C for vitrification. The requirement of storing
articular cartilage tissue in extra CPA solution for vitrification has not been
investigated. Scaling up the vitrification process for increased tissue size faces
the challenge of decreased cooling and warming rates. The long time required to warm
articular cartilage from a large vitrified glass (e.g., intact femoral condyle
surrounded by a correspondingly large amount of vitrification solution) at −196°C to
37°C may affect chondrocyte survival due to devitrification.
In addition, nonuniform temperatures may occur throughout the sample during
cooling and warming,[25,26] which can cause tissue cracks or fractures.
Kroener and Luyet
reported observations of glycerol solution forming cracks during the
vitrification process. Stolberg-Stolberg et al.
showed that fractures in cartilage allograft can increase the release of
inflammatory markers that further impact the chondrocyte metabolic activity and
viability via apoptosis. Cracking was not significant in the 10-mm diameter
osteochondral dowels; this is probably due to the small volumes of osteochondral
tissue. However, cracking became a challenge when scaling to full femoral condyles
where cartilage factures were noted on the surface after vitrification with a
surrounding CPA solution (
and
). Temperature profiles within the articular cartilage during the different
methods of vitrification and warming are shown in
. The cooling and warming rates of full femoral condyles stored in vacuumed
bags without surrounding CPAs were faster than those condyles stored in plastic
containers with surrounding CPAs. Having a solution surrounding the cartilage tissue
is disadvantageous not only because it induced thermal cracking to the cartilage,
but also because it slowed down the cooling and warming of the cartilage that may
lead to tissue devitrification and chondrocyte death. From the above findings, we
concluded that removing the surrounding CPAs before vitrification can (1) improve
the cooling and warming of articular cartilage (
) and (2) reduce the thermal-mechanical stress in the large volume that
results in cracks propagating through the articular cartilage (
), and this helps retain a high chondrocyte viability (
) and functionality (
).There are other approaches to reduce thermal stress in the literature. Pegg
et al.
proposed an approach to avoid thermal stress in arteries by controlling the
cooling and warming rates. However, this approach required careful calculation of
the thermal properties of the vitrification solution and the targeted sample. Rabin
et al.[26,30,31] further developed a mathematical model to calculate the
thermal-mechanical stress during the freezing of biological samples, for example,
rabbit liver, kidney, and brain. More investigation is required to quantify and
understand the thermal-mechanical effects in articular cartilage when it undergoes
vitrification/warming processes. Our current approach is simple and successful in
preventing cartilage fractures caused by the surrounding CPAs and is effective in
improving the vitrification outcomes of articular cartilage.Chondroitin sulfate was used as an additive for the vitrification of both human
and porcine
articular cartilage to protect chondrocytes from the toxic effects of high
concentrations of CPA in our previous works. Inclusion of ascorbic acid was able to
maintain a similar high chondrocyte survival compared to the inclusion of
chondroitin sulfate during the CPA permeation and vitrification processes (see
and
). Ascorbic acid reduced reactive oxygen species during the CPA permeation
process and protected chondrocytes from oxidative stress in recent research.
The use of ascorbic acid in the vitrification of articular cartilage is a
promising alternative to chondroitin sulfate for future investigations.Although the optimized approach has shown to be promising in vitrification of porcine
femoral condyles, there are limitations in the current study. This study did not
investigate the mechanical properties of post-vitrified cartilage, which is an
important aspect of cartilage functionality, regardless that cell viability is the
current primary method used for assessment of cartilage recovery after
cryopreservation. Chondrocyte viability after vitrification was approximately 70%.
That result can be improved upon to obtain an enhanced clinical outcome with further
protocol modification. In vitro results obtained from this study
require validation in vivo using an animal model as well as human
tissue before protocol translation into clinical use.In summary, this is the first study demonstrating the vitrification of porcine full
femoral condyles, indicating the possibility to scale up the vitrification of
articular cartilage from small osteochondral dowels to full-size femoral condyles.
After tissue vitrification and subsequent warming, our results showed similar
chondrocyte viability of post-vitrified 10-mm diameter osteochondral dowels when
stored with or without a surrounding vitrification solution, which confirmed that
articular cartilage can be vitrified with sufficient CPA permeation in the absence
of a vitrification solution surrounding the tissue. In addition, higher chondrocyte
viability and metabolic activity can be maintained in full femoral condyles when
stored without a surrounding vitrification solution when compared to those with a
surrounding vitrification solution. This difference is due to faster cooling/warming
rates and less thermal-mechanical stress on the large volume of articular cartilage
tissue. This study provides guidance for the development of articular cartilage
packaging processes for vitrification and will benefit tissue banking of intact
human articular cartilage.