| Literature DB >> 33099773 |
Tak Wing Chan1, Morag Henderson1, Maria Sironi1, Juta Kawalerowicz2.
Abstract
We use data from a large scale and nationally representative survey to evaluate two narratives about the social bases of Brexit. The first narrative sees Brexit as a revolt of the economically left-behinds. The second narrative attributes Brexit to the resurgence of an English nationalism. There is some, albeit not always consistent, evidence that people in relative poverty or those living in areas that have seen greater Chinese import penetration are slightly more pro-Leave. People living in economically deprived neighborhoods are not more pro-Brexit. Using the Weberian class-status distinction, it is social status, not social class, which stratifies Brexit support. Individuals for whom being British is important are more pro-Leave. But those who see themselves as British rather than English, and those reporting omnivorous cultural consumption are less supportive of Brexit. Overall, there is empirical support for both narratives. But the weight of the evidence suggests a strong cultural dimension in Brexit support.Entities:
Keywords: Brexit; English nationalism; cosmopolitan worldview; left-behind; social status
Year: 2020 PMID: 33099773 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Sociol ISSN: 0007-1315