Literature DB >> 33099753

Immunosuppressive regimens for adult liver transplant recipients in real-life practice: consensus recommendations from an Italian Working Group.

Umberto Cillo1, Luciano De Carlis2,3, Massimo Del Gaudio4, Paolo De Simone5, Stefano Fagiuoli6, Francesco Lupo7, Giuseppe Tisone8, Riccardo Volpes9.   

Abstract

It is a well-recognized fact that implementing new guidelines in clinical practice may be difficult; therefore the Italian Society for Organ and Tissue Transplantation (SITO) set out to define practical immunosuppression tools for the management of liver transplantation patients. In 2017, an Italian Working Group of liver transplant experts and hepatologists issued a set of consensus statements along with evidence-based recommendations on the use of everolimus after liver transplantation. This article presents the evidence- and consensus-based algorithms developed within the Italian Working Group, which are aimed towards guiding clinicians in the selection of immunosuppressive regimens for the management of adult liver transplant recipients in real-life practice. The liver transplant recipient population, typically managed in clinical practice, was divided into the following categories: (1) standard patients; (2) critically ill patients; (3) patients with a specific etiology; (4) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; (5) and patients with de novo malignancies. The algorithms are divided into two parts, according to the time from transplantation (0-3 months and > 3 months) and are discussed here along with relevant supporting literature, when available. Ultimately, it is hoped that the evidence- and consensus-based algorithms developed within the Italian Working Group, and presented here, contribute to simplify, personalize, and optimize immunosuppression of liver transplantation recipients in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcineurin inhibitor; Chronic kidney disease; Consensus recommendations; Everolimus; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Immunosuppression; Sirolimus; Solid-organ transplantation; Tacrolimus; mTOR inhibitor

Year:  2020        PMID: 33099753      PMCID: PMC7803715          DOI: 10.1007/s12072-020-10091-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Int        ISSN: 1936-0533            Impact factor:   6.047


  58 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in combination with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Carlos Gomez-Martin; Javier Bustamante; Javier F Castroagudin; Magdalena Salcedo; Elena Garralda; Milagros Testillano; Ignacio Herrero; Ana Matilla; Bruno Sangro
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors and everolimus monotherapy in de novo liver transplant recipients preserves renal function.

Authors:  M Masetti; R Montalti; G Rompianesi; M Codeluppi; R Gerring; A Romano; B Begliomini; F Di Benedetto; G E Gerunda
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of polycystic liver disease.

Authors:  Tom J G Gevers; Joost P H Drenth
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Effects of maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Yanik; Srinath Chinnakotla; Sally K Gustafson; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Dorry L Segev; Eric A Engels
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Sirolimus conversion regimen versus continued calcineurin inhibitors in liver allograft recipients: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M F Abdelmalek; A Humar; F Stickel; P Andreone; A Pascher; E Barroso; G W Neff; D Ranjan; L T Toselli; E J Gane; J Scarola; R G Alberts; E S Maller; C-M Lo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: sirolimus- or everolimus-based immunosuppression following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sam E Grigg; Gino L Sarri; Paul J Gow; Neville D Yeomans
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of the UNOS database.

Authors:  Roberto Gedaly; Michael F Daily; Daniel Davenport; Patrick P McHugh; Alvaro Koch; Paul Angulo; Jonathan C Hundley
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-08

8.  End-stage renal disease (ESRD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) using calcineurin-based immunotherapy: risk of development and treatment.

Authors:  T A Gonwa; M L Mai; L B Melton; S R Hays; R M Goldstein; M F Levy; G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism.

Authors:  M Hojo; T Morimoto; M Maluccio; T Asano; K Morimoto; M Lagman; T Shimbo; M Suthanthiran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe; Alan B Leichtman; Eric W Young; Julie Arndorfer; Laura Christensen; Robert M Merion
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Adverse Effects of the 2-Dose BNT162b2 Messenger RNA Vaccine Among Liver Transplantation Recipients.

Authors:  Galia Rahav; Ziv Ben Ari; Yana Davidov; Keren Tsaraf; Oranit Cohen-Ezra; Mariya Likhter; Gil Ben Yakov; Itzchak Levy; Einav G Levin; Yaniv Lustig; Orna Mor
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 6.112

Review 2.  Multidirectional facets of obesity management in the metabolic syndrome population after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kinga Czarnecka; Paulina Czarnecka; Olga Tronina; Teresa Bączkowska; Magdalena Durlik
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Past COVID-19 and immunosuppressive regimens affect the long-term response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Pierluigi Toniutto; Edmondo Falleti; Sara Cmet; Annarosa Cussigh; Laura Veneto; Davide Bitetto; Ezio Fornasiere; Elisa Fumolo; Carlo Fabris; Assunta Sartor; Roberto Peressutti; Francesco Curcio; Laura Regattin; Lucrezia Grillone
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 30.083

Review 4.  Bacterial and Viral Infections in Liver Transplantation: New Insights from Clinical and Surgical Perspectives.

Authors:  Nour Shbaklo; Francesco Tandoi; Tommaso Lupia; Silvia Corcione; Renato Romagnoli; Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 5.  Mitochondria and Cancer Recurrence after Liver Transplantation-What Is the Benefit of Machine Perfusion?

Authors:  Alessandro Parente; Mauricio Flores Carvalho; Janina Eden; Philipp Dutkowski; Andrea Schlegel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  Liver transplantation during COVID-19: Adaptive measures with future significance.

Authors:  Argyrios Gyftopoulos; Ioannis A Ziogas; Martin I Montenovo
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2022-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.